Suspected Chinese hackers with a proven knack for exploiting zero-days in security products are at it again, targeting BeyondTrust customers in attacks that researchers have traced back to late August. 

Mandiant researchers said a likely Chinese government-backed espionage group it previously tracked as UNC5221, and now calls Armory Castle, exploited the critical defect — CVE-2026-102764 — then showcased multiple tactics to escalate privileges, hop around the compromised network and evade detection. 

The same threat group has repeatedly exploited a series of defects in Ivanti products since 2023, a Citrix NetScaler zero-day widely known as CitrixBleed, and last year’s Brickstorm campaign that had an average dwell time of 400 days — all resulting in sweeping attack sprees.

“We are aware of only a small number of impacted organizations at this time, but given the stealth of the activity, and the use of a zero-day, it is possible that additional organizations were also compromised prior to the disclosure,” Kelli Vanderlee, senior analyst at Google Threat Intelligence Group, said in an email.

Mandiant warned organizations to “prepare for potential widespread exploitation,” adding that Armory Castle and other threat groups previously conducted broad, opportunistic exploitation following public vulnerability disclosures.

Mandiant and GTIG released their analysis of Armory Castle and its latest campaign as BeyondTrust publicly disclosed the vulnerability in its Remote Support product Thursday. The company’s security said it released a patch for the exploited defect for self-hosted customers Oct. 8 and automatically applied the update to cloud-based versions of the product that same day.

BeyondTrust, which conducted its own investigation and coordinated with Mandiant on an investigation involving a self-hosted customer that was compromised, noted Armory Castle’s prowess.

“This threat actor rotates its infrastructure and tooling for every victim, so attribution here rests on behavior. The indicators from one intrusion rarely survive to the next,” the company’s security team wrote in a blog post. “The threat actor has historically demonstrated a high degree of operational security awareness, professional practices, and tradecraft.”

A BeyondTrust spokesperson declined to answer questions about how many customers are already compromised or why it didn’t publicly disclose the actively exploited zero-day sooner, and instead referred back to its security advisory. 

The company said the first known instance of zero-day exploitation occurred Aug. 29, which it detected and contained Sept. 28. 

BeyondTrust also said it detected the malicious activity after zero-days were confirmed to be exploited in another security vendor’s product Sept. 27. That timing matches a round of zero-days Citrix NetScaler disclosed, following nearly two days of rampant worry and unconfirmed rumors. 

BeyondTrust did not say if there is any link or overlap between the attacks targeting Citrix NetScaler, which went undetected for more than three weeks, and its remote access product. 

GTIG researchers said there isn’t enough evidence to assess an overall targeting trend, but encouraged all potentially vulnerable organizations to apply the patch and hunt for pre-disclosure activity. 

The threat group’s previous targets include business-process outsourcers, government, legal services, technology companies and software-as-a-service providers.

“Armory Castle remains one of the most prominent China-nexus threat actors due to its persistent targeting of various edge device technologies, use of zero-day vulnerabilities for widespread exploitation across multiple industries and regions, and its continuously expanding and evolving arsenal of tools,” said Dan Perez, technical lead at GTIG.

“This is a well-established pattern for Armory Castle,” Vanderlee said. “Targeting edge devices, which typically do not support endpoint detection and response (EDR), allows the threat actor to minimize opportunities for detection and maintain stealthy, persistent access to targeted networks.”

The post Prolific Chinese espionage group exploits BeyondTrust zero-day appeared first on CyberScoop.

Ivanti customers are in familiar territory, responding to yet another actively exploited zero-day affecting one of the vendor’s most commonly targeted security products. 

Volexity researchers, which discovered in-the-wild exploitation earlier this month, said attackers actually exploited three zero-days in a chain that allowed them to bypass authentication, execute code remotely and escalate privileges. 

Ivanti disclosed and issued a patch for the authentication bypass and remote-code execution components of the exploit chain as a single vulnerability in Ivanti Connect Secure. The company said it initially discovered a portion of the high-severity vulnerability — CVE-2026-104935 — during internal security checks in June.

A threat actor, which Volexity tracks as UTA0576, exploited the defects before Ivanti addressed them and issued a patch.

“Because the issue was discovered internally, was not being actively exploited, and did not meet the threshold for an out-of-band release, a fix was scheduled for inclusion in our normal product release cycle,” an Ivanti spokesperson wrote in response to questions.

“Successful exploitation requires chaining multiple vulnerabilities and Ivanti has fully addressed the unauthenticated remote code execution component of that chain, eliminating the primary exploitation path,” the spokesperson added. “We are also developing additional updates to address the remaining vulnerability and further strengthen product security.”

The full scope of compromise remains under investigation. The company, in a security advisory, said a “limited number of customers” were already compromised prior to disclosure. 

The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency added the defect to its known exploited vulnerabilities catalog Tuesday.

Sean Koessel, vice president of professional services at Volexity, said the earliest confirmed instance of exploitation occurred Oct. 1. Yet, “it wouldn’t surprise us if there was activity toward the end of September,” he added.

Volexity researchers observed a series of post-exploitation activities during an investigation involving a customer’s compromised Ivanti Connect Secure VPN appliance earlier this month. “UTA0576 repeatedly exploited these vulnerabilities to compromise the ICS VPN appliance and run commands on it,” the company wrote in a blog post. 

The threat actor extracted credentials stored on the device, dumped and stole Active Directory metadata, and deployed multiple custom and malicious tools capable of facilitating follow-on attacks, credential testing and hunting for administrator passwords, recovery keys and other passwords.

“Based on Volexity’s observations, UTA0576 primarily focused on credential theft, data exfiltration, log tampering, and network reconnaissance,” the company added.

Ivanti encouraged potentially vulnerable customers to act immediately by upgrading to the latest version of software, running the company’s Integrity Checker Tool regularly, and reviewing indicators of compromise published by Volexity.

CISA also urged Ivanti customers to patch the vulnerability quickly, as it dissuaded customers from relying on the company’s Integrity Checker Tool.

“Organizations seeking to determine whether they were compromised will need to conduct network and memory forensics to identify evidence of exploitation,” the agency said in an alert Tuesday. “Ivanti’s Integrity Checker Tool may not detect evidence of exploitation of CVE-2026-104935 because threat actor commands execute in memory.”

Ivanti products, including Ivanti Connect Secure, are a frequent target for attackers of various motivations in the network edge space. 

CISA has flagged 36 Ivanti defects on its known exploited vulnerabilities catalog since late 2021. At least 6 defects across Ivanti products have been exploited since late January.

“Edge devices are a valuable initial foothold and often enable attackers to pivot further into targeted networks,” Koessel said. “It would be fair to expect widespread exploitation, this is a common theme with most vulnerabilities in edge devices.”

Other researchers also expect exploitation to pick up rapidly. 

“Given the history of attacker attention and focus Ivanti Connect Secure has previously drawn — and the trivial nature of the authentication bypass — widespread, indiscriminate exploitation is inevitable as attackers begin reviewing patches and public information,” said Yordan Ganchev, principal threat intelligence specialist at watchTowr.

“The race condition required for code execution offers little resistance, as an unauthenticated attacker can repeatedly attempt exploitation until it succeeds,” he added.

The post Ivanti misses opportunity to fix vulnerability before attackers got to work and made it a zero-day appeared first on CyberScoop.

Citrix customers just got through back-to-back weekends filled with varying levels of uncertainty and worry, as yet another actively exploited zero-day vulnerability was discovered in Citrix NetScaler products.

Researchers and security experts said the vulnerability — CVE-2026-88779 — is less concerning because exploitation triggers denial of service and only impacts instances that have SAML (security assertion markup language) enabled. 

“This means it doesn’t work out of the box against every NetScaler deployment,” Jake Knott, head of threat intelligence at watchTowr, told CyberScoop. “While this is very inconvenient, it doesn’t have organizations scrambling to trigger incident response.”

Citrix was much quicker and consistent in alerting customers to the emerging threat Friday, and followed up the next day with a more detailed blog post and security advisory that contained a patch for the high-severity defect. 

“After we were alerted to this issue we immediately developed and published a mitigation while concurrently developing, testing and deploying a fix,” a company spokesperson said in a statement. “The fix for this issue is available, and we urge all customers to quickly apply it to their NetScaler instance.”

The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency added the defect to its known exploited vulnerabilities catalog Sunday.

The vendor’s response also provided some relief for customers and researchers who spent much of the previous weekend rushing to assess widespread rumors of other defects in the assailed network edge gateways. In that case, Citrix took most of the weekend to confirm attackers were actively exploiting a pair of NetScaler zero-days, some of which researchers said remained undetected for at least three weeks.

“Citrix did a better job with their response to this vulnerability,” and took steps that enabled customers to make their own risk-based decisions with more currently available information, said Joe Toomey, vice president of underwriting security at insurance provider Coalition. 

“Although it’s difficult to celebrate given this is the third publicly-exploited NetScaler zero-day vulnerability in a two-week window, it is a step in the right direction,” he added. 

Citrix declined to say how many customers are impacted by the latest zero-day or when the first instance of exploitation occurred. Yet, Knott at watchTowr said exploitation likely began Friday. 

The newer defect doesn’t share any technical links with the pair of zero-days Citrix disclosed less than a week prior, but it can accelerate one of those vulnerabilities — CVE-2026-88771 — by intentionally crashing machines to speed up exploitation, Knott said.

While risk is currently perceived low for CVE-2026-88779, it is “incredibly simple to trigger, with a single specially crafted request being all that is needed to knock an appliance offline,” Knott added. “Exploitation is already occurring in the wild, and disrupting an authentication gateway can prevent legitimate users from accessing the services behind it.”

Toomey also described the denial-of-service vulnerability as less serious than the previous week’s actively exploited zero-days. Yet, he noted, exploitation attempts of CVE-2026-88779 “clearly contain shellcode that implies that the threat actor believes they can use this vulnerability, or chain it with another vulnerability, in order to achieve remote-code execution.”

The post Citrix discloses third actively exploited NetScaler zero-day in less than a week appeared first on CyberScoop.

Attackers remained undetected for more than three weeks as they exploited a critical zero-day vulnerability affecting Citrix NetScaler appliances en masse. 

The earliest known instance of CVE-2026-88772 exploitation occurred Sept. 3, Mandiant researchers told CyberScoop Tuesday. 

The besieged security vendor and researchers didn’t confirm the attacks until late last week. By then, Mandiant says, organizations in North America and Europe spanning the government, financial services, education, telecom, legal and professional services sectors were already likely compromised.

“We are aware of dozens of impacted organizations,” Charles Carmakal, chief technology officer at Mandiant Consulting, wrote in a LinkedIn post. He attributed the attacks to “advanced and suspected state-sponsored threat actors.”

The three-week gap — at minimum — between initial exploitation and confirmed in-the-wild attacks gave attackers a significant advantage. 

Mandiant warned that the gap could be even wider. “We are still responding to active intrusions, and new evidence may change our understanding of the campaign timeline,” researchers who published a threat intelligence report on the attacks Tuesday told CyberScoop in an email. 

The incident response firm’s analysis on the latest zero-day attack spree targeting Citrix customers underscores the multi-layered mess network defenders have been responding to since Saturday.

The zero-day exploits in Mandiant’s report only cover half of the problem. Attackers have also exploited a second Citrix NetScaler zero-day — CVE-2026-88771 — since at least Sept. 24, according to GreyNoise, but researchers said that campaign likely started earlier as well.

It’s unclear to what extent the pair of zero-days are linked. But, nearly two days after the first unconfirmed rumors of the attacks surfaced, Citrix disclosed both of the actively exploited defects in a security advisory Sunday, releasing patches for them and six additional vulnerabilities.

Mandiant researchers uncovered multiple novel tools and tactics attackers used to exploit CVE-2026-88772, gain privileged access to compromised environments, hop around the network and steal sensitive data. A threat actor in one observed intrusion routed traffic through novel tunneler malware to “manually conduct internal reconnaissance and credential theft,” researchers wrote. 

Researchers at watchTowr also published technical analysis of CVE-2026-88782 Tuesday.

The attacks from multiple fronts, involving two zero-days, reflect an alarming and sustained pattern of malicious activity targeting so-called edge devices, such as virtual private network gateways and firewalls. 

Vulnerabilities in these devices accounted for 48% of the enterprise-related zero-days last year, according to Google Threat Intelligence Group.

“Our previous research corroborates that both cyber espionage and financially motivated threat actors prioritize exploiting vulnerabilities in edge devices and security appliances,” Mandiant researchers wrote in response to questions on their report. 

“Because most edge devices do not support endpoint detection and response (EDR) monitoring, targeting them, particularly through exploiting zero-day vulnerabilities, provides threat actors with an infection vector that is difficult to detect and prevent, and the opportunity to scale a campaign as long as the exploit remains undiscovered,” the researchers added. 

Carmakal, in his LinkedIn post, warned that Mandiant expects “broad and opportunistic exploitation” of both of the Citrix NetScaler zero-days by a variety of threat actors in the near term.

The post Attackers exploited Citrix NetScaler zero-day for at least three weeks undetected appeared first on CyberScoop.

Citrix took most of the weekend to confirm that attackers were actively exploiting the newest round of NetScaler zero-days, leaving network defenders and threat hunters to react without official confirmation. 

Yet, behind the scenes, multiple CERTs, advisory firms, insurance providers, researchers and chatty security professionals warned their respective peers and communities of a live and serious threat. 

Nearly two days after the first unconfirmed rumors, Citrix published a security advisory Sunday disclosing the exploited zero-days, CVE-2026-88771 and CVE-2026-88772, releasing patches for them and six additional defects.

By then, criticism was at a fever pitch, and for some NetScaler customers the warning came too late. 

“The information vacuum was most striking. Customers were receiving warnings through unofficial channels while Citrix remained publicly silent,” Ben Harris, founder and CEO at watchTowr, told CyberScoop. 

“Customers were left without communication, guidance, or even acknowledgement that the vulnerability that was rumored to exist was real. Citrix could have warned customers that active exploitation was occurring and provided immediate defensive guidance without disclosing technical details that would help attackers,” he added. 

“When active exploitation is underway, hours matter,” Harris said.

Citrix did not directly answer questions about the lengthy communication delay. 

“We recently identified critical vulnerabilities in Citrix NetScaler ADC and Citrix NetScaler Gateway that led us to immediately develop and release a new version of the software that addresses the issues,” the company said in a prepared statement.

The critical defects are both rated 9.5 on the CVSS scale and allow attackers to achieve remote code execution. 

Researchers are particularly concerned about CVE-2026-88771, a command-injection vulnerability that affects all NetScaler appliances in a default configuration. That gives attackers a broad pool of targets and a better chance at successful exploitation. A proof-of-concept exploit for the vulnerability is also publicly available. 

Palo Alto Networks said it identified more than 50,000 publicly exposed instances of Citrix NetScaler devices potentially vulnerable to both of the zero-days as of Sunday. 

The earliest known exploitation attempt occurred Sept. 24 when GreyNoise said it observed an unsuccessful exploitation attempt against a Citrix NetScaler Gateway under its control for malicious activity scanning purposes. But researchers warn that exploitation likely started before then.

Citrix did not say how many customers have been compromised thus far and researchers are still assessing the fallout.

Citrix said it is making generic indicators of compromise available to customers in their user consoles, and the company referred to previously issued guidance for customers who suspect compromise. 

Attribution for the attacks is also still under investigation, yet NetScaler products are a common, recurring target for financially-motivated cybercriminals and state-sponsored espionage groups. 

The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency issued an alert Sunday after Citrix publicly confirmed the attacks on its customers, and added CVE-2026-88771 and CVE-2026-88772 to its known exploited vulnerabilities catalog. The vendor has appeared on the agency’s list of vulnerabilities known to be exploited five times this year, and a total of 26 times since late 2021.

Security leaders across the industry — including Charles Carmakal, chief technology officer at Mandiant Consulting, and Wendi Whitmore, chief security intelligence officer at Palo Alto Networks — also sprung into action Sunday, with direct warnings on LinkedIn about the urgent threat. 

The information vacuum that persisted through most of the weekend put cybersecurity professionals in sometimes unique positions. Joe Toomey, vice president of underwriting security at insurance provider Coalition, said the company notified potentially vulnerable customers with limited official data and no confirmation from CISA or Citrix.

In a LinkedIn post Sunday, he called Citrix “unconscionably irresponsible” for remaining silent for more than 36 hours after word began circulating about in-the-wild exploitation.

“I fully understand a vendor embargoing specific details about a vulnerability when a patch has not yet been published, but once the vuln is exploited in the wild, some of those rules no longer apply,” Toomey wrote.

Citrix and its customers are in familiar territory. The vendor’s products have been widely targeted in previous attack sprees, often involving zero-day exploits and some infamously referred to as CitrixBleed and CitrixBleed 2.

“Citrix has a history of delaying the publication of vulnerabilities, even when they’re being exploited in the wild and affecting customers. Citrix eventually released patches and an advisory, but an adequate response also requires timely, clear communication,” Harris said. 

“Customers shouldn’t have to rely on unofficial warnings, security researchers, and third parties to learn that critical infrastructure may already be compromised,” he added. “This latest incident raises serious questions about whether Citrix has learned from previous crises and meaningfully improved how it protects and informs customers.”

The post Citrix patches actively exploited NetScaler zero-days after a weekend of unofficial warnings appeared first on CyberScoop.

Volexity researchers spotted another state-aligned Chinese threat group exploiting a triple-link chain of zero-day vulnerabilities across multiple campaigns, the company said in a blog post Monday.

The threat group it tracks as UTA0565 exploited the vulnerabilities in Chrome and Microsoft between Sept. 3 and 4 before the defects were disclosed or patched, researchers said.

The timing of the malicious activity mirrors other spikes threat hunters observed and attributed to multiple Chinese espionage threat groups. Yet, Volexity noted UTA0565’s campaigns differed from those attacks by using multiple fake websites to deceive victims.

Volexity shared phishing emails UTA0565 sent to Asian government entities urging them to publicly support imprisoned Hong Kong activist Chow Hang-tung. The group spoofed domains impersonating the Center for American Progress and China Digital Times in other phishing emails.

While UTA0565 showcased a variance in tactics, it used the same components researchers observed in previous instances of the exploit kit across multiple Chinese threat groups.

“This seemingly widespread adoption across multiple threat actors suggests a coordinated effort within the Chinese computer network exploitation community, where the core kit was likely shared, customized, and weaponized by multiple groups,” Volexity wrote in the blog post. “The activity reported so far reflects only two organizations’ observations; the full scope and impact are likely far broader.”

The vulnerabilities include: CVE-2026-85046 and CVE-2026-87491, remote-code execution defects in the JavaScript engine for Chromium-based browsers; and CVE-2026-85880, a privilege-escalation zero-day that Microsoft disclosed Sept. 8 in Windows Advanced Local Procedure Call. 

Proofpoint, which previously observed multiple state-aligned threat groups chaining the vulnerabilities together in attacks since last August, said a limited group of organizations were exposed to all three vulnerabilities in a short window. 

Proofpoint previously attributed attacks involving the zero-days to APT31, UNK_LateNight, UNK_DoubleCheck and UNK_QuietRacket. At the time it warned that attackers of other origins and motivations could strike soon as well.

Volexity said UTA0565 used a payload from a previously undocumented malware family it tracks as “CLEANGULP.” Researchers also found several domains likely used by UTA0565 in similar campaigns targeting media organizations, halal restaurant search websites and corporate training organizations. 

“UTA0565’s use of the zero-day vulnerabilities shows technical and operational improvements over other campaigns observed by Volexity, both in the mechanics of the exploitation and the presentation to end users,” researchers wrote. “Using real content from legitimate websites as decoy material continues to be an effective way to reduce user suspicion.”

The post Volexity spots another China-aligned threat group exploiting Chrome and Microsoft defects appeared first on CyberScoop.

Attackers of unknown origins and motivations are exploiting a critical zero-day vulnerability in Cisco Secure Email Gateway, authorities and researchers said Monday.

The vulnerability — CVE-2026-76461 —  was exploited before Cisco disclosed and patched the defect Monday and allows unauthenticated, remote attackers to execute commands with root privileges on vulnerable systems. “In practical terms, that gives the attacker control of the gateway itself,” Douglas McKee, director of vulnerability intelligence at Rapid7, told CyberScoop.

Cisco said its product security incident response team became aware of active exploitation of the defect affecting Cisco AsyncOS Software for Cisco Secure Email Gateway in September. When asked for further details, a company spokesperson pointed to the advisory and reiterated that the company is aware of active exploitation of the vulnerability.

The company did not say how many organizations are impacted by active exploitation thus far, but it indicated multiple customers were likely compromised prior to disclosure. 

“Cisco has conducted a thorough threat intelligence investigation on devices that belong to Cisco Secure Email Cloud. Cisco has directly contacted customers who own Cisco Secure Email Cloud devices where indicators of possible compromise were identified,” the company wrote in its security advisory. “Cisco is engaged in remediation and recovery operations. Cisco has already deployed mitigations that are within Cisco’s management.”

The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency added the zero-day, which affects cloud-based and on-premises instances of Cisco Secure Email Gateway, to its known exploited vulnerabilities catalog shortly after Cisco’s disclosure. 

The tight timeline between Cisco’s public advisory and patch guidance, and CISA’s quick addition to the KEV catalog indicates the vulnerability deserves immediate attention, McKee said. 

“The combination here is pretty ugly. No authentication is required, an attacker can reach the vulnerable code by sending an email through the appliance, successful exploitation can result in root-level command execution, and Cisco has observed exploitation in the wild,” he added.

Researchers at Rapid7 and VulnCheck said they don’t yet know how many organizations are impacted by active exploits, but they encouraged Cisco customers to patch and hunt for potential signs of compromise as soon as possible. 

Spencer McIntyre, director of exploit development at VulnCheck, told CyberScoop the exploit could allow an attacker to maintain access to the email gateway and monitor communications. “Stealing or silently snooping on email comms is a common tactic for state-sponsored and other threat actors conducting espionage operations,” he said. 

“It’s going to be worse for organizations that have the appliance deployed on-premises. In this case, the attacker could pivot internally,” McIntyre added. “If, however, organizations use a cloud instance, the compromised gateway is less likely to have significant access to internal organizational resources.”

Cisco released indicators of compromise to help customers hunt for attempted exploitation in their environments, but the company added that attackers could remove or hide those traces with the level of access granted via exploitation.

The post Cisco warns customers of actively exploited zero-day in email gateways appeared first on CyberScoop.

Proofpoint researchers have spotted at least four state-aligned threat groups chain a trio of zero-day vulnerabilities to conduct espionage on various targets of interest to China’s government since late August. 

The Chinese espionage group that Proofpoint tracks as TA412, also known as Violet Typhoon and APT31, struck first, exploiting the chain of vulnerabilities Aug. 28. At least three additional espionage threat groups followed suit, exploiting the same vulnerabilities in subsequent waves of attacks days later, researchers said.

The exploit chain Proofpoint calls BlueMoon targets Chrome, Chromium-based browsers and Microsoft Windows. It allows attackers to run code in the browser’s sandbox, escape the sandbox and gain system privileges to access a targeted machine, said Mark Kelly, staff threat researcher at Proofpoint.

“All three vulnerabilities were exploited before patches were available to the public,” he said.

The vulnerabilities include: CVE-2026-85046 and CVE-2026-87491, remote-code execution defects in the JavaScript engine for Chromium-based browsers; and CVE-2026-85880, a privilege-escalation zero-day that Microsoft disclosed Tuesday in Windows Advanced Local Procedure Call. 

“While the V8 vulnerabilities were known and fixed in Chromium source code, they were not yet patched in the latest publicly available browsers at the time of the activity, meaning they effectively functioned as zero-days in those products,” Kelly said.

Proofpoint said the exploit kit developer likely reverse engineered the publicly available Chromium patches to weaponize the browser exploit chain during that gap.

With a limited group of organizations exposed to all three vulnerabilities, attackers moved quickly and likely rushed development to target a narrow pool of potential targets. “In all observed cases, the infrastructure used for exploit delivery was created on the same day as — or in the days immediately preceding — the associated campaigns,” Proofpoint wrote in a threat intelligence report.

APT31, a group that’s committed espionage on behalf of China’s Ministry of State Security, including seven Chinese nationals indicted by the Justice Department in 2024, dropped various lures containing the exploit chain loader in phishing emails targeting non-governmental organizations, mining companies and commodity trading firms in the United States. 

The phishing link installed a malicious browser extension disguised as Google Gemini on targeted machines, enabling attackers to surveil browser activity, steal credentials and execute commands, according to Proofpoint. 

Other distinct threat groups have also used the BlueMoon exploit chain with some slight technical changes and variances in targeting. 

“Proofpoint observed BlueMoon usage as recently as Sept. 8,” Kelly said. “The activity peaked Sept. 2-3 immediately prior to the Chrome patch being released and has continued intermittently since then.”

A China-aligned espionage threat group Proofpoint tracks as UNK_LateNight targeted multiple U.S. aerospace companies Sept. 2. Researchers also that day observed UNK_DoubleCheck, a suspected espionage-motivated threat group targeting Vietnamese manufacturing organizations with emails from a compromised Southeast Asian government account. 

Researchers said UNK_QuietRacket, another espionage group aligned with China, targeted government, consulting and financial sector organizations in Indonesia and Singapore Sept. 3.

Proofpoint has directly observed fewer than 20 organizations targeted globally thus far, but Kelly said the true number of impacted organizations is likely much higher. 

While Proofpoint attributes most of the observed attacks to Chinese espionage groups, attackers of other origins and motivations could strike soon as well. 

“Given its ease of adoption, we expect the exploit kit is likely to proliferate further and be adopted by additional espionage-motivated and financially motivated threat actors as patched versions are fully rolled out across all Chromium-based browsers,” Kelly said.

The post Chinese espionage groups swarm to exploit triple-link chain of zero-days appeared first on CyberScoop.

A notorious cybercrime group has once again exploited a critical zero-day vulnerability on a large scale, claiming it stole data from dozens of organizations, including some of the world’s largest publicly traded companies.

Clop, a prolific but calculated data theft extortion group that’s been active since 2020, began sending threatening emails to its alleged victims in mid-July, according to researchers. 

The fallout from the attack spree, which followed a familiar pattern for Clop and its targeted pool of victims, is still evolving as companies hunt for potential signs of compromise.

The vulnerability at the center of Clop’s latest campaign affects a pair of software products from PTC — Windchill and FlexPLM — which manufacturers and retailers, particularly in the manufacturing, aerospace, and automotive industries, use to automate supply chain systems and manage product lifecycles.

“This continues Clop’s trend of targeting SaaS logistics companies’ platforms with zero-days and carrying out mass-exploitation campaigns,” Allan Liska, field chief information security officer at Recorded Future, told CyberScoop.

PTC disclosed the vulnerability — CVE-2026-12569 — on June 17 and issued a patch and initial indicators of compromise the following day. 

Yet, that was too late for some of Clop’s known victims who were likely compromised by exploitation of the zero-day in early June, according to Ransom-ISAC.

The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency added the defect, which allows unauthenticated attackers to execute code remotely, to its known exploited vulnerabilities catalog June 25.

PTC consistently added new indicators of compromise as they were discovered by researchers. But the company hasn’t said how it first became aware of the vulnerability and ensuing attacks, when the earliest known instance of exploitation occurred or how many customers are known to be compromised. 

PTC did not respond to a request for comment. 

Clop’s claimed victim set is diverse. The point-of-sale restaurant management platform Toast and software vendor Zebra both told CyberScoop they detected and contained system intrusions, but claimed limited impacts. Other alleged victims, including GE, Philips and Shell, did not respond to requests for comment. 

Researchers continue to uncover new details about the tools Clop used once it exploited and gained access to PTC customer systems. ReliaQuest said the group used a custom web shell that gave attackers a direct path to credential theft and large-scale data theft.

The fully equipped extortion platform, which was purpose-built for Windchill, decrypts credentials, delivers malware, and includes tools for sustained access, network traversal and data encryption, ReliaQuest researchers wrote in a report Tuesday.

The toolkit allows attackers to move quickly from initial access to data theft and additional post-exploitation activity without executing manual commands — a framework that mimics Windchill’s standard functions and limits defenders’ ability to detect any malicious activity.

“This campaign is another reminder that Clop remains a sleeping dragon, always looking and preparing to mass exploit vulnerabilities in software that holds sensitive data,” ReliaQuest researchers wrote in the report. “The group commonly goes inactive between campaigns but springs to life with custom-built web shells whenever there is another opportunity for mass extortion.” 

The drawn-out impact of Clop’s latest attack spree also mirrors some of its previous campaigns. The threat group has successfully exploited zero-days across multiple technology vendors’ systems, allowing it to steal sensitive data for weeks — sometimes months — from many downstream customers.

Clop targeted dozens of Oracle E-Business Suite customers for more than three months, beginning in the summer of 2025, before it started bombarding victims with extortion emails. The group also achieved mass exploitation as it infiltrated MOVEit environments in 2023, ultimately exposing data from more than 2,300 organizations, making it the largest and most significant cyberattack that year.

The post The long tail of Clop’s PTC hack is just beginning to emerge appeared first on CyberScoop.

Last week, the FBI and EPA issued a joint alert that should concern anyone who drinks water in America–which is to say, everyone. Since July 27, water and wastewater utilities in at least seven states have reported cyberattacks against internet-facing programmable logic controllers (PLCs), the small industrial computers that run pumps, valves, and treatment equipment. Some of these attacks degraded operations. Utilities reported pressure loss and flooding, several systems reverted to manual control, and one Minnesota community declaring a local state of emergency.

Nothing about these attacks required sophisticated methods. The attackers didn’t use zero-day exploits or novel malware. They found controllers exposed to the public internet, many of them so old that they stopped receiving security patches years ago. They logged in, changed IP addresses and passwords, and locked operators out of their own equipment. In at least one case, they modified the ladder logic controlling industrial equipment. These were not Hollywood-style hacks. The controllers sat exposed and undefended.

If this feels familiar, it should. In late 2023, attackers compromised controllers at water utilities across several states, including the widely reported incident in Aliquippa, Pennsylvania. The federal government issued guidance then, too. One of the crucial differences between then and now is that attackers have grown in ambition. They’ve moved from defacing screens to disrupting operations across dozens of systems at once, exploiting the fact that third-party integrators often deploy the same vulnerable configuration across many small utilities. 

The uncomfortable truth is that this was preventable. The reason it wasn’t stopped is more structural than technical. The United States has roughly 50,000 community water systems. Most are small, publicly funded, and run by operators whose primary job is keeping water safe and flowing. Cybersecurity ranks far below that, if it ranks at all. The devices in question are often a decade or more old and replacing them takes capital these utilities don’t have. Rules governing water cybersecurity remain mostly voluntary. Attackers understand these economics perfectly. We should too, yet these attacks keep happening.

 But inaction is a choice. The defenses that work here cost little and require no exotic technology. The FBI and EPA guidance is sound, and every water and wastewater organization should act on it this week, not later. Here’s how:

• Get controllers off the public internet. No PLC should be reachable from the outside world. Remote access should go through a secure gateway that mediates, monitors, and logs every connection. That includes cellular modems, which are the overlooked entry point in nearly every audit.
• Fix passwords. Default and shared credentials are still the most common way in. Strong, unique passwords are the cheapest security control available.
• Restrict communication between devices. Firewall rules and access control lists should allow only expected communication between known control system devices. Block traffic from hosting providers and other sources that have no business touching a water plant.
• Lock the logic. Keep physical and software key switches in the run position except during authorized updates. This prevents unauthorized changes to configuration and firmware.
• Practice running manually. The utilities that survived these attacks best were the those that switched to manual operations quickly. That skill requires constant practice.
• Verify, don’t assume. Nearly every utility believes its PLCs aren’t internet-exposed, right up until an inventory proves otherwise. You can’t protect what you can’t see. Most operators are surprised by what a complete asset inventory reveals: forgotten modems, integrator-installed remote access, devices nobody knew were still online.

Every attack like this follows the same pattern. Attackers change configurations, reset passwords, and modify project files. Every one of those actions creates a signal on the network before operations degrade. In this most recent case, one victim only noticed ladder logic discrepancies across multiple sites. Catching intrusions shouldn’t depend on a sharp-eyed engineer having a good day. Continuous monitoring of OT environments exists to turn those signals into alerts within minutes instead of days. That difference is the difference between an incident report and a boil-water notice.

Water systems have the least margin for error and, too often, the fewest resources to defend themselves. The FBI and EPA have told us plainly what’s happening and what to do about it. The attackers are betting we won’t follow through. For the third time in three years, they’re testing that bet.

Let’s finally prove them wrong.

The post The water sector just got it’s wake-up call. Again. appeared first on CyberScoop.

Researchers said INC ransomware, one of the most active ransomware groups globally, has been the main attacker exploiting a pair of SonicWall zero-days soon after they were disclosed last month.

The prolific ransomware-as-a-service operation wasn’t the first group to exploit the flaws, which were actively exploited for three weeks before the vendor disclosed and patched the defects July 14, but it has been the most assertive and concerning group to target and chain both vulnerabilities together for full access.

“Since public disclosure, INC ransomware has emerged as the most commonly named threat actor actively weaponizing this vulnerability chain,” Brett Deroche, director of incident response at Rapid7, told CyberScoop. “While Inc is the name driving the post-disclosure wave, we can’t attribute the full body of exploitation to INC specifically.”

SonicWall did not respond to a request for comment.

The SonicWall vulnerabilities — CVE-2026-15409 and CVE-2026-15410 — are the latest in a series of security issues confronting the vendor’s customers, including actively exploited zero-days, previously disclosed defects, and an attack last year that allowed a state-sponsored threat group to steal the firewall configurations of every SonicWall customer. 

Just last week, Huntress researchers spotted an attack spree that compromised 30 SonicWall customers in less than two days. 

Ransomware groups have taken a special interest in SonicWall. Ten of the 17 SonicWall defects added to the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency’s known exploited vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog since late 2021 are known to be used in ransomware campaigns.

INC ransomware, which has claimed nearly 900 victims across 71 countries since it was first discovered three years ago, is just the latest financially-motivated group to target SonicWall customers. 

Researchers haven’t determined how many organizations have been impacted by the latest SonicWall zero-days, including attacks linked to INC ransomware. 

“Attribution here isn’t a single clean answer. The earliest exploitation we observed, beginning June 22, traced back to common hosted infrastructure, though those attacks were largely unsuccessful,” Deroche said. 

“INC’s confirmed activity that we’ve observed came after public disclosure, using different infrastructure and moving from initial access to ransomware deployment in short order. That’s a meaningfully different operational tempo and skill level than what we saw pre-disclosure,” he added. 

Deroche said Rapid7 has successfully prevented data theft and encryption in the majority of recent cases, yet noted ransomware was deployed in at least one case the security vendor observed.

Yet, there could be other attacks outside the purview of Rapid7’s telemetry. INC ransomware has listed multiple new alleged victims on its data leak site, including organizations and government agencies in Australia, the United States, the United Arab Emirates, Colombia and Switzerland, Resecurity said in a blog post Saturday.

The company said it has aided several victims with incident response, and learned multiple victims received emails and phone calls from alleged hackers who pressured them to engage in negotiations.

The post Prolific ransomware group behind SonicWall zero-day attacks appeared first on CyberScoop.

We almost never get both sides of an intrusion. This time we did.

Last month, Hugging Face disclosed a breach into part of its production infrastructure, saying an autonomous AI agent system ran the attack from start to finish. Five days later, OpenAI revealed that its own models, including GPT-5.6 Sol along with an unreleased one, were responsible for the breach. OpenAI called it an unprecedented cyber incident.

Most of the commentary since has been about AI capability. That is the least useful part of the story, because the capability was doing what it was destined to do. Security teams should look at a simpler truth: in both systems, the key defenses sat behind untrusted code that was already running.

What the two disclosures actually describe

Together, the report shows one connected attack across two firms. Code running on a low-level employee’s machine led to stolen passwords, privilege escalation and lateral moves, then out to the web to hit other targets. No step in that chain is novel. The speed and the number of attempts are what changed.

OpenAI’s evaluation ran in what it calls a highly isolated environment, with network access constrained to a single path: an internally hosted third-party proxy and cache for package registries. The models spent vast computer power searching for an exit. They exploited a zero-day flaw in that proxy, gained higher rights, and moved until they reached a machine with web access. They guessed that Hugging Face held the test solutions, used stolen passwords with more zero-days, and ran code on Hugging Face servers.

Hugging Face picks up the same chain from the receiving end, and its initial access is worth reading twice. A malicious dataset used two flaws in the data pipeline to run code on a worker machine. The agent took over the node, stole cloud keys, and moved into internal clusters over the weekend.

The sandbox was was the only boundary

Both setups assumed the sandbox would hold, so no real checks stood before code execution.  A sandbox is a good control. It is a terrible last control. When isolation is all you have between untrusted code and everything else, one flaw could give the attacker full control. 

Look at what each team allowed. OpenAI allowed one exit path—good engineering, but that proxy contained an unpatched flaw. Hugging Face ran a tool that executes code inside submitted data—a known feature, not a hidden mistake.

Neither choice was careless. Both made sense until a fast, automated system probed them thousands of times.

Why automated agents behave differently

Blocking a human stops them or slows them down. Blocking an AI gives it data. The AI logs the error, changes its plan, and tries again instantly. It keeps trying as long as someone pays for the computing power.

Hugging Face tracked over 17,000 attack events across short-lived sandboxes. OpenAI said its models focused on the goal with extreme effort.

This changes the attacker’s limit. It is no longer skill or patience. It is budget. Computing power scales with money, and code never sleeps. Any defense that relies on attackers giving up after a few tries must change.

Detecting malicious behavior is not the same as preventing execution

Detection worked—but too late

Detection worked, but too late to stop the loss. Hugging Face used AI tools to spot the breach, isolate systems, reset keys, fix flaws, and alert police. That is a good response.

Yet it happened after the attacker accessed private data, stole keys, and moved through internal networks. OpenAI spotted the event only after its models reached another firm’s database. Detection limited the damage; it did not stop the attack.

A breach is a race between attack speed and defender response speed. AI agents speed up attacks with money. Human approval steps slow down defenders.

Hugging Face also surfaced an asymmetry that deserves more attention. When the team tried to analyze the attack with frontier models behind commercial APIs, the requests were blocked, because forensic work means submitting real attack commands, exploit payloads and command-and-control artifacts, and a safety filter cannot tell a responder from an attacker. They used an open-weight model on their own infrastructure instead. The attacker operated under no usage policy at all. The defender’s tooling was the side that got refused.

Detection is not prevention

Detection asks what happened. Prevention asks if it can happen at all. Against AI agents, the gap between those questions is where attacks succeed. The agent builds an attack out of single steps that look harmless on their own.

OpenAI noted this in its research: models operating over long horizons learn approval blind spots and work around them. Safety requires asking what a series of actions aims to achieve, not just if one step is allowed. Most systems check one call at a time: read a file, install a package, open a port. Every step passes. The full chain is the attack.

Six fixes for real defense

To survive automated attacks, defense must shift before code runs. That starts with treating data like code. Dataset loaders, templates, and configuration files all run instructions, so they demand strict controls: block remote execution by default, require review, and check the source of every outside file. Security teams must also control outgoing traffic with strict lists of approved destinations, while treating every proxy in that path as vulnerable. Finally, firms must remove permanent keys, issuing short-lived credentials for single jobs so a hacked worker machine yields almost nothing to an attacker.

Beyond individual machines, isolation must happen per task rather than per user, stopping an automated swarm from moving through internal networks. Authorization also needs to change. Checking single actions fails when an agent builds an attack out of simple steps. Systems must evaluate full sequences instead, setting caps on activity rates and automated spending to flag suspicious chains of events. Lastly, defenders need the freedom to act fast. Security teams need authority to isolate systems without waiting for leadership meetings, and the ability to vet a capable model you can run on your own infrastructure for forensics.

What boards must ask now

Corporate boards usually ask if the company uses AI responsibly. That’s rooted in compliance not safety. Directors should ask four direct questions instead: Which systems run outside code, and what checks sit in front of them? If an attacker targets a low-level employee, what keys and paths can they obtain? How fast do we move from the first warning to active containment? And can we analyze attack code on our own hardware, free from third-party rules?

The boundary has to move

Nothing in these disclosures required a capability that did not exist last year. The chain was ordinary. What changed is that an adversary can run that ordinary chain thousands of times over a weekend, learn from every failure, and never need a coffee break.

The models did not break the detection-and-response model. They exposed where we put the trust boundary. We put it after execution, and we assumed we would have time on the other side of it. We do not have that time anymore.

Move the boundary.

The post What the Hugging Face breach reveals about defense in the age of agentic AI appeared first on CyberScoop.

AI systems like Anthropic’s Project Glasswing and Microsoft’s MDASH are aiding in the discovery of vulnerabilities, filling the ever-growing pool of defects that defenders have to address before exploitation occurs. Yet, through the first half of 2026, these vulnerabilities were no more or less likely to be exploited than all vulnerabilities disclosed during that period, VulnCheck said in a report Tuesday. 

Concerns remain high about AI-discovered vulnerabilities fueling more attacks, but VulnCheck’s review of exploitation data shows that those fears are unfounded, at least so far. 

Patrick Garrity, security researcher at VulnCheck and report author, identified 1,061 vulnerabilities attributed to AI-assisted discovery during the first six months of the year. Of those vulnerabilities discovered by AI, 14 ( 1.3%) were exploited in the wild, a breakdown that aligns with the exploitation rate researchers observed across all vulnerabilities during the same period. 

“While AI-assisted vulnerability discovery clearly has value for both attackers and defenders, the data does not suggest that AI discovered vulnerabilities are inherently more likely to be exploited than those found through traditional methods,” Garrity wrote.

While AI’s contribution to actively exploited vulnerabilities was muted in the first half of the year, it’s too soon to assume that trend will continue. Moreover, none of these major vulnerability-hunting models were running for that full period. Project Glasswing rolled out in April, while Microsoft’s MDASH and OpenAI’s Daybreak were both unveiled in May.

The upward trend in Microsoft’s monthly Patch Tuesday indicates how much the floodgates might open through the remainder of the year as AI models discover more vulnerabilities. The company’s July security update contained an all-time-record of 622 vulnerabilities, besting the previous record-breaking June update with 206 vulnerabilities.

VulnCheck’s state of exploitation report also found that vulnerabilities were exploited much faster after CVE publication, speeding up from an average of 120 days in 2025 to 80 days during the first half of the year.

The intelligence firm also determined which technology categories were actively exploited most often. Content management systems accounted for nearly one-third of the 495 known exploited vulnerabilities VulnCheck identified during the first half of 2026. Network edge devices were responsible for almost 14%, followed by operating systems at nearly 9%, server software at 8%, and AI products — an emerging attack surface — at almost 6%.

The post AI-assisted security tools are finding more bugs, but the threat level has not changed appeared first on CyberScoop.

A Russian state-sponsored threat group has been stealing sensitive data from governments and commercial organizations since July 2025 via a novel exploit in popular Linux-based enterprise software, U.S. authorities and cyber officials from more than a dozen other countries warned in a joint cybersecurity advisory Thursday.

Laundry Bear’s most recent espionage campaign involves the exploitation of a zero-day vulnerability in Zimbra Collaboration Suite that wasn’t patched until November 2025, five months after attacks were well underway, officials said. 

The exploit just requires a view — no clicks — and allows attackers to steal the previous 90 days’ worth of email, the account’s password, search history, the victim organization’s email directory, two-factor authentication tokens and other newly created passwords.

“The covert and persistent nature of this activity, along with the absence of any known financial extortion, almost certainly indicates this group’s involvement in espionage activities with Russian government backing,” officials wrote in the advisory. 

“Additionally, extensive Ukrainian targeting, prior to use against U.S. and other NATO allies, outlines an increasing trend within Russian cyber threat groups to target Ukrainian users first—both as a priority target and as a testbench for malicious cyber techniques before broader global deployment.”

The state-sponsored espionage group, also known as Void Blizzard, has compromised governments and organizations in the defense, education, energy, law enforcement, media, finance, transportation and technology sectors. 

Laundry Bear’s year-long campaign involving the exploitation of CVE-2025-66376 showcases more technical capabilities, including a custom JavaScript payload it delivers to targeted victims via phishing emails. The threat group could also likely adapt the novel data exfiltration and aggregation capability, dubbed “beehive,” to exploit other vulnerabilities, officials warned.

The defect’s medium-severity rating of 6.1 underscores the challenge defenders regularly confront in prioritizing patching schedules based on measure of severity alone.

The Russian state-supported group, which has been active since at least 2024, is still actively exploiting Zimbra Collaboration Suite instances that remain unpatched, officials said.

Authorities shared Thursday indicators of compromise, mitigation steps and urged organizations to update their vulnerable software.

“This campaign’s targeted victimology and limited exploitation capabilities likely indicate this group manually identifies and targets the victim organizations” by identifying organizations with public-facing infrastructure, officials wrote in the advisory.

Once a target is identified, Laundry Bear also likely compiles email addresses for users to target with the exploit via phishing emails. Officials did not identify specific victims or describe the volume of organizations already compromised.

The joint cybersecurity advisory was issued by the United States, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Italy, Moldova, the Netherlands, Poland, Spain and Sweden.

The post Russian espionage group using novel Zimbra exploit to steal sensitive data from Western countries appeared first on CyberScoop.

SonicWall customers are attempting to dodge another security challenge as attackers are exploiting a pair of zero-day vulnerabilities that have been confirmed by the vendor. 

The company publicly disclosed the vulnerabilities — CVE-2026-15409 and CVE-2026-15410 — in a security advisory Tuesday. SonicWall credited an employee with discovering the defects, but it hasn’t said when the discovery occurred or the earliest known instance of exploitation. 

Rapid7 researchers told CyberScoop both vulnerabilities were first exploited June 22. “From the cases that our team has observed, the goal is likely ransomware, though we have prevented the actors from achieving exfiltration and encryption,” said Seth Lazarus, senior manager of detection and response services at Rapid7.

Overlapping tactics, techniques and procedures from the attacks observed by Rapid7 indicate the same threat group or attacker discovered and exploited the zero-days, Lazarus added.

SonicWall did not answer questions about the impacts of these attacks thus far, and the company hasn’t attributed the attacks to a known group or described the attacker’s origins and motivations.

The vendor did, however, confirm to CyberScoop that both vulnerabilities have been chained together for exploitation. The vulnerabilities affecting SonicWall SMA1000 appliances, including a max-severity defect that allows attackers to make authenticated requests and a 7.2-rated vulnerability that allows authenticated command injection.

“When these two are chained, an attacker can go from zero access to a complete system compromise for the affected appliance,” said Landon Rice, senior exploit developer at VulnCheck.

Ben Harris, founder and CEO at watchTowr, said two characteristics of the vulnerabilities fuel a sense of dread. “Both were exploited as zero-days before fixes were available, and together they offer a plausible path to remote-code execution from the internet,” he said.

The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency added both zero-days to its known exploited vulnerabilities catalog Tuesday. 

SonicWall encouraged customers to patch the vulnerabilities by upgrading to the latest software version, which it released upon disclosure, and shared some indicators of compromise to help customers hunt for potential malicious activity on their systems.

“Speed of response was a priority for us,” said Bret Fitzgerald, senior director of global communications at SonicWall. “Within days of becoming aware of the issue, our team had developed a script that we can run on behalf of affected customers to assist with resolution, and mitigation efforts are already underway.”

SonicWall and third-party researchers haven’t said how many SonicWall customers are impacted by the exploited vulnerabilities, but the vendor did say it already investigated multiple cases of active exploitation. 

Fitzgerald said the company monitors about one million sensors globally and “SMA1000 appliances represent a very small subset of that footprint, less than 5,000 units.”

SonicWall said support staff are also helping customers work through instances of suspicious activity, warning that patching alone is not sufficient. 

The vendor and its customers have been hit by a barrage of actively exploited zero-days and previously disclosed defects in SonicWall devices for years. In 2025, an undisclosed state-sponsored threat actor intruded the company’s cloud environment and stole firewall configurations of every SonicWall customer. 

Seventeen defects affecting the vendor’s products have been added to CISA’s known exploited vulnerabilities catalog since late 2021. Ten of those defects are known to be used in ransomware campaigns, according to CISA, including a wave of about 40 Akira ransomware attacks between mid-July and early August.

“As always,” Harris said, “when something is confirmed as already exploited in the wild, patching is the bare minimum, and breach should be assumed.”

The post SonicWall customers under threat as attackers exploit 2 zero-days appeared first on CyberScoop.

China-aligned attackers broke into the networks of U.S. and Canadian universities to steal sensitive data and establish persistent access via webshells and backdoors, Proofpoint threat researchers said Tuesday. 

The espionage-motivated attacks targeted physics and engineering departments, focusing on administrators and professors with national security links or organizations researching astrophysics and particle physics.

Proofpoint identified less than 10 university victims and estimates a few dozen universities may be impacted, Greg Lesnewich, principal threat researcher at Proofpoint, told CyberScoop. The company first observed the campaign in May and believes the campaign is ongoing. 

“There is a high likelihood that many victims have not been made aware of this activity yet,” Lesnewich added.

Researchers traced the attacks to a pair of critical vulnerabilities in Roundcube, an open-source email client, that were exploited and chained together to steal credentials and gain long-term access.

The threat cluster, which Proofpoint tracks as UNK_MassTraction, exploited CVE-2024-42009 to execute JavaScript inside the victim’s browser, then exploited CVE-2025-49113 to gain a foothold in the mailserver. 

The initial exploit in the chain only requires a victim to open an email, and the attackers sent victims a series of generic lures to trigger the initial access.

Proofpoint attributes the campaign to a China-aligned cluster because the attackers used a known covert network used by multiple China-aligned threat groups, an infection chain leading to VShell and left Chinese language artifacts in the phishing emails. 

Researchers haven’t drawn any conclusions about why attackers targeted the universities and what they are seeking. 

“We do not have data to suggest what got stolen, as we only observe the initial inbound email attempt,” Lesnewich said. 

The engineering aspects do align with China’s strategic initiatives, he added. Google threat hunters recently spotted a Chinese state-sponsored espionage group that burrowed into systems for years, stealing data across academia, medicine, military, cybersecurity and foreign policy. 

“China-aligned adversaries have been targeting other types of edge devices such as routers and VPN concentrators for years with various exploits to create a foothold into a target network, not using email for delivery,” Lesnewich said. “This campaign flips that on its head, using email to deliver an exploit chain to compromise a mail server, instead of using email to deliver a credential harvesting URL or malware to target an end user, not a server.”

The post Suspected Chinese espionage group used a Roundcube exploit chain to burrow into universities appeared first on CyberScoop.

A cybercriminal exploited a critical defect Saturday in the payments processing feature of Oracle E-Business Suite that could mark the early stages of a potentially broader campaign, researchers said.

Defused, a threat intelligence firm, spotted six instances of exploitation during a two-hour window on its honeypots, or decoys designed to monitor malicious activity in non-production environments, Simo Kohonen, founder and CEO of the company, told CyberScoop.

Oracle disclosed and patched the vulnerability, which is tracked as CVE-2026-46817 with a 9.8 severity rating, in late May and warned that exploitation complexity is low.

Kohonen said the exploits were attributed to a single IP address and occurred before any proof-of-concepts were publicly available. 

“With only one IP and one day of data, it reads more like reconnaissance and weaponization testing than a targeted campaign against a specific victim,” he added.

The potential expansion of malicious activity on live networks could be significant. Shadowserver scans found about 950 potentially vulnerable instances of Oracle E-Business Suite on Wednesday, and more than half of those publicly exposed deployments are based in the United States. 

The defect impacts a popular collection of business applications that attackers have hit before in widespread attack sprees. 

The notorious Clop ransomware group attempted to extort dozens of victims after it exploited a zero-day and other vulnerabilities in Oracle E-Business Suite last year. The aggressive extortion campaign got underway in October, roughly two months after Clop exploited the defect and stole data en masse.

Oracle customers were more recently impacted by an actively exploited zero-day vulnerability in PeopleSoft, which includes more than 40 tools for human resources and customer relationship management. 

ShinyHunters, the group behind that attack spree dating back to late May, potentially infiltrated the networks of more than 100 organizations mostly in higher education, according to Mandiant and Google Threat Intelligence Group.

The post Researchers spot exploitation of another critical Oracle defect appeared first on CyberScoop.