The Trump administration executive order on artificial intelligence tried to strike the balance between responsible use, security and mutual benefit, all with an eye toward not making it regulatory in nature, National Cyber Director Sean Cairncross said Tuesday.
βEveryone is working towards the same goal in terms of protecting the country and securing our systems, and we are trying to ensure that defenders have this technology as quickly and at scale as possible, but there are obviously specific security concerns, and industry has been very sensitive to this as well,β Cairncross said at the Black Hat 2026 conference in Las Vegas.
The security concerns about AI have moved to the forefront of discussions about the technology after OpenAI models escaped a test environment to hack the company Hugging Face last month.
βThe design of this is that when there is something that happens, when there is a breach, when there is an event, that that system, that network of connections can exist, adapt to that, and seek to remedy that as quickly as possible, so that form follows function rather than turning that upside down, and as usual with the government pen just proceeding in a vacuum,β Cairncross said.
The Trump administration has drawn criticism over whether it has struck the right balance on AI rules. Trumpβs AI executive order notably got pulled just before its scheduled release, with the final version signed in June missing some aspects that had drawn industry opposition.
βWhat needs to be built is a flexible, adaptable structure that enables information sharing between industry and government, so we can guarantee that this technology benefits everyone itβs going to benefit, but is used responsibly and securely,β Cairncross said.
He said the administration is working with industry during implementation of the executive order.
βA regulatory regime would not only strangle growth, development, and innovation, and be enormously harmful to the industry, but it would be obsolete 48 hours after it was gone through whatever process it had gone through,β Cairncross said.
Open source will play a βvitalβ role in the U.S. spreading its vision for AI across the globe, he said.
βWe are extremely interested in looking at ways to build U.S. open source, make it competitive, make it the preferential adoption by planet Earth,β Cairncross said. βWe understand and appreciate the value to the ecosystem that it has, the innovation, the startups who rely on it, the leap forward it makes possible in ways that otherwise would never happen. And so I think itβs an incredibly thriving ecosystem in AI right now, and we are looking to do what we can to grow, foster, and push that U.S. open source model.βΒ
Speaking at the same conference, Nick Andersen, the acting director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, seconded Cairncrossβs comments about AI executive order implementation. He touted the Gold Eagle clearinghouse as one example.
βThose are fantastic opportunities we have to really provide a unifying function around the way that weβre going to do AI-enabled vulnerability reporting and disclosure at scale in a way that we havenβt had to do before with some of our legacy platforms, and just continue to expand out those opportunities,β he said. βThat access β to build off the directorβs point earlier β to really enable that industry collaboration, thatβs so key and critical to us as we move forward.β
Matt Kapko contributed reporting to this story.
Updated 8/5/2026: to include comments from Andersen.
The post National cyber director lays out White House plans to secure AI without writing new rules appeared first on CyberScoop.