• Microsoft has revealed a new Surface Pro 12-inch tablet and Surface Laptop 13-inch
• Both consumer devices are built around a 6-core Snapdragon X2 Plus processor
• They go on sale on October 13, 2026, starting at $1,149.99 / AU$1,999 for the Surface Pro and $1,199 / AU$2,099 for the Surface Laptop

It seems like Microsoft might be getting its mojo back for its Surface line-up of products, with Brett Ostrum, Corporate Vice President, Surface Devices, announcing at Qualcomm’s Snapdragon Summit that the company will be releasing a new Surface Pro 12-inch tablet and Surface Laptop 13-inch. Both will be powered by Qualcomm’s Snapdragon X2 Plus chips, which explains the venue choice. (I’m sure it had nothing to do with the fact that the Snapdragon Summit is held in Hawaii).

According to Microsoft, the two new Surface devices with Snapdragon X2 Plus CPUs will be up to 17% faster for Office workloads, up to 18% more battery efficient, and offer over 60% faster graphics performance.

As these are Microsoft products, there is also the now-customary boasting about AI performance, with the Qualcomm Hexagon NPU offering 80 TOPS (Trillion Operations Per Second) resulting in a claimed 95% faster local AI performance.

The Surface Pro 12-inch (2026) is a Windows 11 tablet built around the 6-core Snapdragon X2 Plus processor, partnered with either 16GB or 24GB of LPDDR5x RAM, and 256GB or 512GB storage. The 12-inch LCD display has a resolution of 2196 x 1464 and a refresh rate of up to 90Hz. The screen of this new model is, according to Microsoft, 25% brighter than the previous model, and there’s a new black color. Microsoft estimates around 15.5 hours of local video playback and 13 hours of web use on a single charge. It’ll start at $1,149.99 / AU$1,999 (around £900) and goes on sale on October 13, 2026.

The Surface Laptop 13-inch (2026) features the same 6-core Snapdragon X2 Plus chip and is available in the same memory and storage configurations as the Surface Pro. The 13-inch touchscreen has a resolution of 1920 x 1280 and a refresh rate of 60Hz, which I’m not going to lie, is a bit disappointing in a laptop these days, although Microsoft claims the 500-nit display is 25% brighter than the last model.

It also has two USB-C (USB 3.2) ports and a USB-A port, a 3.5mm headphone jack, Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 5.4. Microsoft claims up to 22.5 hours of battery life, which if accurate is very impressive.

The Surface Laptop will start at $1,199 / AU$2,099 (around £920) and will also go on sale on October 13, 2026.

Ready to take on the MacBook Air?

Microsoft’s announcement of two new consumer Surface devices is definitely welcome. Surface Pro tablets and Surface Laptops used to be Microsoft’s flagship products and showcases for cutting-edge Windows features. They certainly felt like Microsoft’s attempts to create a MacBook Air. The problem is, they never reached that potential, and when Apple switched to using its own Arm-based M series chips in 2020, the gap widened even further.

Surface devices also had a larger than life cheerleader in the form of Panos Panay, who had a major role at Microsoft and whose passion for the Surface line-up, that he helped create, was infectious (even if that infection didn’t translate into sales). After Panay left Microsoft for Amazon, it felt like the wind had been taken out of Surface’s sails, which wasn’t helped when Microsoft aimed recent Surface devices at commercial and business users, rather than mainstream consumers.

So, it’s good to see that these new Surface devices are firmly pitched at consumers, and the price points are around the same as the MacBook Air since Apple increased prices earlier this year. It also pits them against new Googlebooks, which are going on sale soon as well, and are priced similarly.

Will this mean Microsoft finally has a MacBook Air rival? While I’m glad it’s trying again, I’m not too sure. The Snapdragon X2 Plus is a decent mid-range chip, but the 6-core variant in the new Surface devices falls short of the 10-core CPU in the M5, especially as the M5 offers better single-core performance.

My main concern with the Surface Laptop is that the 1920 x 1280 screen just won’t compare to the display of the MacBook Air, which offers a 2560 x 1664 resolution for a much sharper image.

I’ve also seen the first five new Googlebook laptops, and they all come with higher resolution screens, and some also feature OLED.

The screen of the Surface Pro 12-inch (2026) is more promising, though if you want to use it as a laptop, you’ll need to buy a keyboard accessory, which adds to the price. However, it should still come in at under the price of Apple’s 13-inch iPad Pro.

So, I’m not entirely sure that these will be the MacBook Air/iPad Pro killers Microsoft needs them to be, but I’m glad Microsoft is at least trying again, and I could be proved wrong when we get the new Surface devices in for review soon.

• XMG has announced price rises for its laptops due to the increased cost of components
• The laptop maker points out that DDR5 RAM for laptops is now close to 6x the price it was before the memory crisis
• We're also hearing that Micron has pulled the plug on its 2GB modules of GDDR7, and Nvidia's supply of VRAM could feel an impact from this

The RAM crisis sadly keeps rolling on and finding fresh pricing misery to heap on us, and that includes new laptop hikes and a hint that Nvidia GPUs could be in yet another spot of bother.

VideoCardz spotted the development with laptops, as manufacturer XMG announced on Reddit that its notebooks are subject to price hikes of either €100 or €150 for most models, or €300 in one case (that's for a Schenker portable, which is XMG's parent company, so it's all under the same umbrella).

Some laptop upgrades have got pricier, too, with a €120 premium on an RTX 5090 configuration, and as XMG observed: "The reason [for the price rises] is another increase in purchasing costs. This is no longer just about RAM and SSDs: PCBs, electronic components, CPUs, graphics cards and video memory are also contributing to the higher cost level."

In other words, everything is subject to price inflation, including the motherboard and associated chips, as well as the mentioned key components.

XMG highlighted data drawn from Geizhals (which tracks German retail prices) showing that DDR5 RAM for laptops is close to 6x the price it was before the memory shortage began (in mid-2025).

The laptop maker also made it clear that discrete GPUs and GDDR7 video memory have become more expensive, as have the prices of AMD and Intel laptop processors.

Also on the subject of GPUs, Wccftech reports that another slight worry is that Micron is no longer making 2GB modules of GDDR7 video RAM which are used in some Nvidia RTX 5000 GPUs.

Uniko's Hardware flagged up this news in a post on X, noting that these chips have "reached end of life" and that this is the case for all Micron 2GB modules, with only 3GB GDDR7 chips now listed on the memory maker's website.

With Micron apparently no longer supplying Nvidia with those 2GB modules, that means more of a squeeze on the availability of video memory for RTX 5000 graphics cards, at least in theory. This could hit stock levels and put a bit more pressure on pricing (which is already climbing fast).

Analysis: yet more pressure

We need to season the claims around Micron here, as this isn't a definitive statement from the company itself, and more to the point, it's only a minor supplier for Nvidia's gaming GPUs. Team Green gets the majority of its GDDR7 from Samsung and SK Hynix, and so the impact here should be relatively slight.

However, I'd argue that any impact is bad news given the current climate which is rapidly worsening for GPUs, particularly those from Nvidia which are heading upwards at a rate of knots for some models. The RTX 5090 has got completely ridiculous, the RTX 5080 is similarly out of hand, and even the RTX 5070 is now feeling the pricing heat, with a 30% price rise compared to two months ago in the US (and a similar picture elsewhere).

So, even small extra pressures are really not going to help Nvidia's GeForce GPUs here.

As for the laptop price hikes, this is a sign of the RAM supply times, and XMG is following other makers who have had to jack up prices (like Dell for example, which just bumped up the XPS 13 in a roundabout way).

It's a commendable level of transparency from XMG here, with the company making it clear that it isn't turning any extra profit from these laptop price increases. XMG also observed that other factors are in play with increased costs for notebook makers, and that includes rising air freight costs (due to conflicts in the Middle East) and difficulties with shipping by sea, too.

Gaming laptop deals have been pretty dire in recent months (to say the least), but every now and again I spot a listing that's worth the cash. That's the case today with this RTX 5070 Ti-equipped MSI Vector 16 for $1,399 (was $1,749) at Walmart.

If you've got a bit of cash to spend on a new laptop, then this MSI Vector is definitely worth keeping on your list. It's been a while since I've seen a machine with such a graphics card for so cheap, although there are a few caveats.

First, you only get 16GB of RAM, which is somewhat expected given the price. The second trade-off is that you only get a 512GB storage drive.

It's the storage drive that's the most galling omission here, although I'd be willing to sacrifice a bit of space to get such a powerful graphics card at this price. You're essentially trading the ability to have a ton of games installed at once for better in-game performance. Personally, I don't think that's too bad.

Today's best gaming laptop deal at Walmart

• See more: check out all of today's gaming laptop deals at Walmart

Even with 16GB of RAM, I'd pick this MSI Vector 16 over similarly priced RTX 5060 and RTX 5070 machines on the market currently.

The RAM will likely bottleneck your performance in some games, but a machine with an RTX 5070 Ti and 16GB of RAM should still outpace a machine with an RTX 5060 and 32GB of RAM. For one, the RTX 5070 Ti features 12GB of VRAM versus the rather meagre 8GB on the RTX 5060. Again, I think the lack of RAM is an acceptable trade-off to secure the RTX 5070 Ti at this particular price.

Dell XPS 13 (2026): Two-minute review

The new Dell XPS 13 (2026) is a shift from Dell's usual modus operandi, finally bringing the premium-quality XPS line down to a more affordable space. If that sounds familiar, it's because Apple did the exact same thing earlier this year: the arrival of the MacBook Neo has shaken up the laptop market, and evidently left other manufacturers scrambling to front their own competition to Apple's new wallet-friendly MacBook.

But before I delve into how effective a frontline soldier Dell's new effort is in the never-ending battle between Windows and Mac, it's time for a brief history lesson: the lore of XPS, if you like.

Dell's XPS brand was unceremoniously killed off last year, before being suddenly resurrected at CES 2026, presumably because their executives realised that shuttering your single most iconic and well-loved brand is a bad idea (shocker, I know). But as I mentioned above, the return of XPS has seen a paradigm shift; while the Dell XPS 14 and XPS 16 are still the pricey, high-end laptops I've come to expect from the XPS lineup, the new XPS 13 is an entirely different beast.

It's still identifiably an XPS laptop, there's no denying that. From the ultra-thin chassis to the all-metal casing and minimalist logo on the lid, you'd be forgiven for thinking at first glance that this was just another premium XPS model.

But opening up the laptop betrays its more budget-conscious nature immediately; gone are the giant, edgeless touchpad and zero-spacing keyboard seen on this year's 14- and 16-inch models, replaced instead by more traditional fare. The touchpad and keyboard here wouldn't look out of place on the average Chromebook.

A peek at the spec sheet further solidifies the new XPS 13's position as a MacBook Neo rival; a lower-end hexa-core Intel Core 5 chip and only 8GB of RAM in the base model all point to this being a more sensibly priced product.

I'll dig into the performance specifics later in this review, but the good news is that the lower-spec hardware doesn't render the XPS 13 dangerously underpowered. This laptop is perfectly capable of handling everyday work, even if it's not a performant powerhouse like its bigger siblings. The battery life is also excellent, and the display is very high quality for the price point. In short, there's a lot to love here.

Unfortunately, there are a few things that hold this new breed of XPS back. The base configuration features only 8GB of RAM, which is fundamentally insufficient in the current era of Windows software, and the measly port selection may prove frustrating for some users. It's also just a bit too expensive to be considered a true rival to the MacBook Neo.

Now, it's arguable that this isn't entirely Dell's fault. The ongoing RAM crisis, spurred by skyrocketing demand for AI data center hardware, is causing the prices of all kinds of computer components to spike sharply. Shifting to 8GB of RAM in the base configuration is very likely to be a cost-saving move. Overall, I'd say that this is a pretty solid effort from Dell – just don't expect too much from it.

Dell XPS 13 (2026) review: Price & availability

• Starts at $699 / £749 / AU$1,597.20
• Student discounts help a lot
• Available worldwide

Brace yourself: this is going to be one of the longest price sections I've written for a review in a while. There's a lot to talk about here, sorry!

Apologies to our readers outside the US: the pricing of the Dell XPS 13 beyond America is pretty damn awful, to the point where I'm worried it might have already scuppered any chance of this laptop being a genuine competitor against the MacBook Neo.

In the US, the base configuration comes with a 256GB SSD, Intel Core 5 320 processor, and 8GB of RAM. It'll cost you a very reasonable $699, or $599 with a student discount – in other words, exactly the same price as the 256GB MacBook Neo.

However, I'd generally struggle a little to recommend that version. 8GB of RAM is simply substandard for running software in Windows 11 these days, especially if you plan to run multiple programs at once. Stepping up to the safer recommended 16GB of RAM (which also mandatorily bumps up the SSD to 512GB) will cost you $899, already taking us a fair bit beyond the competing MacBook Neo. Of course, there's no 16GB version of the Neo available, but it's worth noting that the 'unified memory' used by Apple's laptops is a bit more efficient than traditional laptop RAM.

Outside the US, things start to look dicey. For starters, there's no 256GB SSD configuration available in Australia, with the cheapest available models starting at £749 / AU$1,597.20 – a far less attractive prospect after accounting for exchange rates. And if you want to bump things up to 16GB of RAM, you're looking at a fairly steep £1,099 / $1,897.50. My review unit is the 8GB UK configuration with 512GB of storage, which will cost you £899 (though at the time of writing, it's already on sale for £769)

There are higher-spec models available, too, with the RAM configurable up to 32GB and the SSD up to 1TB, as well as the option to upgrade the CPU to a significantly more powerful Intel Core Ultra 7 355. This top-spec model will cost you $1,799.99 / £1,899 / $3,698.20 – and quite frankly, at that point you might be better served by opting for the more premium XPS 14. Configurations with the Core Ultra 7 processor also benefit from an upgrade to Thunderbolt 4-capable USB-C ports.

Overall, I'm not too impressed by the pricing of the Dell XPS 13, especially considering its market position as a Windows-toting rival to the MacBook Neo. There's certainly still an argument that it deserves a place among the best budget laptops (for buyers in the US, at least), but it's not the phenomenal value product I was really hoping to see when I first heard about it. Still, if you're a US shopper who wants a basic but effective laptop for work or school, it's not a terrible choice.

• Value score: 3 / 5

Dell XPS 13 (2026) review: Specs

Dell XPS 13 (2026) review: Design

• Impressively thin and light
• Premium build quality
• Port selection is feeble

Straight off the bat, despite its aggressive redesign and shift towards more conventional aesthetics, the 2026 Dell XPS 13 still feels like a premium product. I might have complained about the pricing further up in this review, but considering that the build quality remains solid regardless of which configuration you buy, I have to admit that I'm very pleased here.

The entire chassis is machined from high-grade aluminum, making it highly durable without compromising on weight. The whole thing weighs almost exactly one kilogram, and combined with the 13.4-inch display's slim bezels, it's a very portable laptop indeed.

It's also impressively thin, measuring just half an inch thick with the lid closed. The casing has rounded corners and a smooth matte finish, which is reasonably good at resisting scratches and fingerprint marks. It's available in a few different colorways, all muted metallic tones, with availability varying between regions and configurations.

The keyboard and touchpad are totally different from what we've seen on previous XPS 13 models, now trending towards functionality over style. The LED-backlit keys are reasonably spaced, comfortable to type on even for extended periods, and have a decent amount of travel despite the laptop's ultra-thin design.

They're perhaps a little spongy on full presses for my liking, with a bit of flex in the keyboard housing; something which I consider completely forgivable in a sub-$800 laptop, but might push some users towards the more premium typing experience of the XPS 14 or 16. Similarly, the touchpad has a satisfying click, but firm presses on the bottom corners feel a tiny bit flimsy – definitely not a dealbreaker for a budget laptop, but again, it gives me pause when it comes to recommending the higher-spec models.

Thankfully, some things haven't changed from previous models. The display is once again the star of the show here: a fantastic 2.5K touch panel, boasting good maximum brightness and impressive color reproduction, especially considering that the screen is the same regardless of which internal spec you opt for. If you get the cheapest configuration, you're getting plenty of bang for your buck when it comes to the display.

Looking at the rest of the physical design, it's all good without being spectacular. The speakers are integrated under thin slots on either side of the base and are reasonably loud for such a small laptop. Don't expect thumping bass here, but the volume is good without high notes sounding tinny.

The webcam is also decent, 1080p rather than the 720p resolution you'll find on many budget-conscious laptops. I've certainly seen sharper webcam footage, and the low-light performance is merely okay, but it gets the job done well for the most part. It also supports facial recognition logins via Windows Hello. The integrated microphone array is decidedly average, though, so I'd advise getting a decent headset if you plan to make regular video calls.

Lastly, we come to connectivity, which is perhaps the most mixed part of an already mixed bag. Wireless connectivity is top-notch; Wi-Fi 7 ensures speedy, lossless internet (assuming you're connected to a network that supports it!) while Bluetooth 6.0 is an exceedingly rare sight on any laptop under $1,000.

Physical connections, though? Yeah, this one's a wash. We criticised the MacBook Neo for only having two basic USB-C ports (no Thunderbolt 4 support), and it's the same case here. Granted, these are both USB 3.2, while one of the Neo's ports is a frankly pathetic USB 2, and springing for the higher-spec CPU upgrades both ports to Thunderbolt 4, but it's still just fundamentally not enough ports.

Considering that the only way to charge the XPS 13 is to use one of the only two ports available, you're down to just a single port any time it's plugged in. Power users who want to connect multiple peripherals are going to need to spend extra on a USB-C hub, and anyone who doesn't shell out for the more powerful CPU will be dealing with slower charging and data transfer speeds.

Overall, it's a well-designed laptop that feels like it should last for years, but I will be docking a point for the sheer dearth of ports. If you prefer to connect your hardware solely via wireless means, though, you should have very little to complain about here.

• Design score: 4 / 5

Dell XPS 13 (2026) review: Performance

• Decent everyday performance
• Gets a little warm under load
• 8GB RAM is simply not enough for heavier workloads

I'm a big believer in setting realistic expectations, so once I learned that my XPS 13 review unit was the UK standard configuration with 8GB of RAM and the decidedly low-end Core Ultra 5 320 CPU, I immediately tempered my hopes of great performance.

Despite this, this XPS 13 performed a bit better than I'd expected overall. Performance in my everyday workloads – including web browsing, word processing, and some light image editing in GIMP – was good, with virtually no slowdown even with half a dozen Chrome tabs open and Spotify running in the background. Windows 11 generally felt snappy and responsive.

The more you start to load it down with tasks, though, the more it struggles. The simple fact is that in the current age of computer software, 8GB of RAM just isn't sufficient for more complex or varied workloads.

It was a telling moment when Apple finally relented and upgraded the minimum starting memory on the best MacBooks to 16GB rather than 8GB back in 2024; the demands of modern professionals have shifted, and I was rather upset to see that the MacBook Neo has reverted back to 8GB as standard. However, this is less of a problem for Apple, since the 'unified memory' used in MacBooks is faster and more efficient than traditional DDR laptop RAM, and the company's total control of the Mac software/hardware ecosystem makes optimizing for less memory a bit easier.

So let's break down how the XPS 13's 8GB of RAM actually performed. I'll start with the bad news: some of my tests failed to complete altogether, loading up but then aborting. I've not seen this happen in quite a while, with the 16GB industry standard evidently shielding me from such failures.

In total, the XPS 13 failed eight of our standard benchmark tests, most of which were the more demanding 3DMark graphical tests. However, I also noticed some instability in other tests; Cinebench crashed several times before I was able to get stable readings, and 3DMark also crashed once before I was even able to start running tests.

The tests that did run showed decidedly lackluster performance in 3D rendering and similar creative workloads. This isn't a laptop you'll be squeezing in a few rounds of Marvel Rivals on, though I did manage to get Slay the Spire II running fine, so perhaps some 2D indie gaming is still on the table here.

Outside of regular testing, I also tried to fire up Adobe Photoshop and Premiere Pro. Both initially loaded without crashing, but were sluggish in practice, and Photoshop ended up crashing after about five minutes of use.

The Dell XPS 13 (2026) got rather warm during the more intensive tests. The thermal exhaust is a thin slot nestled into the display hinge, and while the fans remained impressively quiet throughout my testing, the underside of the laptop did get too toasty to comfortably have it actually on your lap while running resource-intensive software. It did remain cool and near-silent during regular office work, however.

The takeaway here is that while the 8GB model of the XPS 13 is perfectly capable of handling basic everyday workloads, it just doesn't have the oomph for anything more demanding than straightforward office or schoolwork. If that's all you want to do, the budget-friendly 8GB configuration should be fine; if you've got grander designs than that, you'll need to pay extra for a more powerful model.

• Performance score: 3 / 5

Dell XPS 13 (2026) review: Battery life

Intel's third-generation Core chips are clearly putting in some work here. Although the Dell XPS 13 (2026) only has a 52Wh battery (far smaller than the batteries you'll find on many ultrabooks these days), the efficiency of this chip can't be understated; our video playback battery test saw the laptop sail comfortably past the 16-hour mark.

There are laptops that can go for longer, but at this price point, that's a very respectable effort. It outstrips the MacBook Neo by nearly three hours according to our tests. I found that even at maximum brightness, with a Bluetooth mouse and headset connected and the Windows power mode set to Balanced, it could comfortably make it through an eight-hour workday without needing a charge.

The laptop also holds charge fantastically when not in use. My partner got sick, and I had to shelve this review for a couple of weeks, during which time the XPS 13 simply sat untouched on a desk in my home office. When I finally opened it up to start my review process, it was still at 90% charge. When plugged in, it charges up to full in just under an hour (though the higher-spec model with Thunderbolt 4 ports will presumably charge faster).

My only real criticism here is that it doesn't come with a power adapter in the UK and EU. Much like Apple's approach with the MacBook Neo, this is ostensibly due to local regulations that mandate consumers' ability to buy a laptop without a charger, but come on; you could include the option to add one at checkout. I've criticized Apple for this in the past, too: it's malicious compliance, and it's simply irritating for the end user.

• Battery life score: 4.5 / 5

Should I buy the Dell XPS 13?

Scorecard

Buy it if…

Don't buy it if…

Dell XPS 13 (2026) review: Also consider

How I tested the Dell XPS 13 (2026)

• Tested for one week
• Used for a variety of workloads
• 8+ years of hardware testing experience

If you've read any of my other reviews, you'll already know the drill: I swapped out my daily driver (the excellent Asus Zenbook Duo 14) for the Dell XPS 13 for one full week, including the weekend.

This helps me get a proper feeling for how the laptop functions in everyday use scenarios, testing it out for a range of typical tasks including web research, writing articles, and image editing. Naturally, I also ran the laptop through our usual suite of synthetic benchmarking tests, including our looped video test for battery life.

I've been a computer hardware journalist for more than eight years, and working for TechRadar for half a decade. In that time, I've reviewed more laptops than I can remember for numerous different publications; the number is certainly in the dozens, quite likely into triple digits by now! I put every bit of experience and expertise I've gained over those years into my reviews, so you can rest assured that you're getting accurate, bias-free information.

• First reviewed: September 2026
• Read more about how we test

Beaming so brightly, I was tempted to measure his nits, President of Android Ecosystem at Google, Sameer Samat, grasped my hand tightly and asked, "So what do you think?"

Samat was referring to the five brand-spanking new Googlebooks arrayed around the room, all running Googlebook OS, the first hybrid lovechild of ChromeOS and Android.

A year ago in an interview with me ostensibly about Android 16, the over-sharing Samat let slip, "we’re going to be combining ChromeOS and Android into a single platform," and set the tech world on fire.

He said it so casually back in July 2025 that I scarcely grasped the significance. After all, there's been chatter about the idea for ages, but no one had confirmed it, and if it were true, it would mean Google was looking at the idea of an Android ecosystem in a whole new way.

Now, however, we have the fruits of that comment and all the labor in Googlebook OS and Googlebooks laptops from partners Asus, Acer, Lenovo, Dell, and HP, which go on pre-order today and start shipping October 5.

Samat told me that he wanted five partner brands and not just two because he wanted to show the breadth of options and noted that they have some points of differentiation, like some have facial recognition, and other Googlebooks include a fingerprint reader. To this point, we have ultra-lights, like the 2.2lb Asus, and workhorses, like a 15-inch Lenovo, and pen-supporting convertibles from Acer. While there's a range of CPUs, from the Intel Core Ultra line to the Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite, and even MediaTek, they do all share some core Googlebook features.

There's the Glowbar, a thin, multi-colored bar on the top cover of all the laptops that lights up to let you know, among other things, that Gemini is at work, or to show battery status. There are even some Easter Eggs to discover. I wondered out loud if the battery status would work when the laptops weren't plugged in. Unfortunately, it's to show charge status.

Each laptop has a massive, haptic touchpad, and there's a G key for quick access to Google features, and a special Caps Lock key with instant access to text-based add-ons like emojis. They all offer the magic cursor, which you can jiggle to open screen-aware Gemini access, basically telling Gemini to do [this] with [that] on-screen element. They all also start with 16GB. Samat told me he was excited that they all start with the "right amount of RAM." 16GB means these natively Gemini-supporting portables are ready for a lot of local AI (the CPUs can reportedly handle up to 45 TOPs).

While a hybrid platform, there's no indication that this is a mobile OS in desktop clothing. Yes, there are things like customizable widgets (and ones you can create via prompts) that I, after a two-finger click on the trackpad, could endlessly resize and move, and access to all your Android Apps. But there are also desktop-level apps and services (online and offline access to Canva, Netflix, and Adobe apps), a dock, and a full file system.

One cool demo showed how you could search across files on your Googlebook and Android phone and even dig into inscrutable file names because the system can see inside files.

The Android infusion combines the Android in your hand and the Googlebook laptop on your desk. There's a single sign-on that recognizes you as one user on the phone and laptop. An email started on your Android phone can be continued seamlessly on the laptop (it does not yet let you go in the other direction). There's a small icon that appears in the dock, showing a tiny phone. You click that, and it opens the email draft on the laptop Gmail app.

The intention here is quite clear: a true Android ecosystem where, Samat told me, it all just works. "That's the dream," he said. The benchmark for such an ecosystem will always be Apple and how its laptops, desktops, phones, and wearables all work together. I asked Samat if I could expect similar levels of interoperability, zeroing in on how when I get an authentication code on my iPhone, it automatically appears on my MacBook Air. He said the unified messaging system will allow this, and added that they would've demoed it on stage that day, but wanted to keep the presentation relatively lean.

Before the event, I wondered if Googlebooks were intended to compete with Apple's new and quite popular $699 / £699 / AU$1,049 MacBook Neo. However, these systems start at $899 / £999 (around AU$1,899) , and a few were $1,199 (around £1,200 / AU$1,680) and $1,299 (around £1,300 / AU$1,800).

That was intentional. Samat, who said Neos are great but that people often find their performance limits, told me they wanted to start with premium offerings. Instead of compromises, Googlebooks offer eye-catching designs and real performance.

Googlebooks run desktop-grade apps online and offline, though App downloads appear to come exclusively through the Google Play Store, and in demos I saw, the systems have the power to do traditional coding and Agentic or Vibe Coding with Google Antigravity. It's worth mentioning, though, that to do the latter, you will need a Gemini account and tokens.

Samat, though, is excited about the power and possibilities, enthusing over the inclusion of a Linux Terminal, a fact that's not surprising since the stack includes a Linux Kernel (right below the Android Stack).

Glancing around the room, Samat asked me which Googlebook was my favorite. As I scanned the crowded demo space, I realized just how much each laptop looked like a standard Windows system, until, of course, you opened them up and saw that Googlebook OS desktop. After a moment, I told him the 2.2-lb. Asus Googlebook is quite attractive. Samat grinned and asked me if I'd checked out the aluminum-clad HP. I agreed that it looked like a premium laptop, too.

On stage, Samat said, "For so long I’ve wanted to do what we’re doing today," calling Googlebooks "a new category of laptops built for how people actually work today."

Later, Samat told me this is "just a start," and there's a lot more to come.

The Googlebooks I saw were notable for their smooth and polished operation. It may be the merging of two platforms, but each Googlebook's desktop and operations I tried felt remarkably unified, as if they'd been together all along.

Still, I had to wonder how this all fits in with Googlebook's cousin, the Chromebook, low-cost laptops that are more or less shell systems offering easy access to cloud-based apps. Schools love them. Samat claimed that 70% of all US education is using them and said it's the only system designed to be passed from one person to another (as each user signs in and out and so on).

Googlebooks and Chromebooks are not mutually exclusive. Samat said Chromebook is important, but it's for a different user and purpose. I said that Chromebook is a doorway, but the Googlebook appears to be about productivity. "Exactly," he told me, still smiling.

I spent quite a bit of this year wondering about Googlebooks. After Google announced them in May, things got a little quiet, and I noticed that when I was at the huge Computex 2026 show in Taiwan, no one seemed to be talking about them — Nvidia’s RTX Spark ARM chip, and Windows 11 competitors to the (then recently-released) MacBook Neo, were the talk of Taipei.

Computex would have been the ideal event for Google and its hardware partners to hype up Googlebooks, if only to give us a bit of a tease. Instead, the silence made me worry that they could end up being another Google product that quickly gets forgotten about.

So, when rumors of an impending Googlebook launch started cropping up a month or so ago, I was very interested. However, with information still so thin on the ground, no one was really sure what a Googlebook would be. Would they be budget laptops designed to replace Chromebooks? Or, might they be mid-rangers aimed at taking on the MacBook Neo?

Well, now that we have pricing information, and I’ve spent time with the five Googlebooks that will go on sale on October 5, I can confirm that Googlebooks are neither of those things — instead, they’re premium thin and light laptops designed to rival the MacBook Air, and Windows 11-powered Ultrabooks. And that makes them all the more interesting.

More ambitious than a Chromebook

With the cheapest Googlebook, the Acer Googlebook 14, starting at $899 / £999 (around AU$1,899), you might be disappointed that these aren’t going to be ultra-affordable Chromebook replacements, especially at a time when prices of everything, especially tech, seems to be climbing.

However, as multiple Google employees told me when I visited the company's UK headquarters in London, Googlebooks are not replacing Chromebooks. Instead, Chromebooks will remain the budget, entry-level, laptop choice running Chrome OS, while Chromebook Plus devices will remain the mid-range option.

Googlebooks, meanwhile, will be the high-end, flagship laptops that run an entirely new operating system — Googlebook OS — while still offering plenty of value for money.

The $1,000 / £1,000-plus price has allowed Google and its hardware partners to be rather ambitious with these first-generation Googlebooks. Each one (the aforementioned Acer Googlebook 14, plus the Lenovo Googlebook 15, HP Googlebook 14, Dell XPS Googlebook, and Asus Googlebook 14) has a stylish thin and light design, and, depending on the model, offers premium features such as OLED touch displays, haptic touchpads, and fingerprint sensors.

Each Googlebook also has a ‘Glowbar’, which is an LED stripe located on the back of the lid that can light up in a variety of ways depending on what you’re doing on the Googlebook. Described by John Maletis, Google’s VP Laptops and Tablets, at the launch event I attended, as a ‘distinctively Google design statement’, it adds a nice bit of color to each Googlebook, and I especially liked how it can show the battery level of the device when it’s plugged in and charging.

In the future, third-party developers will have access to the Glowbar, so that their apps can use the feature, and while I can’t see it being an essential part of the Googlebook experience (remember, the Glowbar is on the back of the laptop’s lid, so usually facing away from the user, limiting its usefulness), it’s a nice little detail that helps these laptops stand out.

Googlebooks also have premium components to complement their designs. Each one comes with at least 16GB of RAM and a 256GB SSD, and some models will allow for higher configurations up to 32GB of RAM and larger SSDs. They're also powered by high-end chips from Intel (series 3 Core Ultra processors) and Qualcomm (Snapdragon X Elite and X1 Elite chips), and feature NPUs capable of over 45 TOPS (trillions of operations per second) for on-device AI — as you might expect from Google, a big focus of Googlebooks is AI.

Thanks to this combination of powerful specs and the lightweight Googlebook OS, Googlebooks feel very fast and responsive in use. While I wasn’t able to run any benchmarks during my time with the new devices, I spent a decent amount of time with each one browsing the web, using apps and even playing some games (admittedly Android games designed for mobile, but even they can be quite graphically impressive these days), and Googlebook OS was fast and fluid, with nary a pause as I opened up multiple apps.

With Google promising up to 10 years of software support, these Googlebooks could be the last laptop you buy for a long time — and that makes their higher prices slightly more palatable. A 10-year lifespan for a laptop feels very MacBook-like too.

A brand-new operating system

Perhaps the most exciting thing about Googlebooks is that they're running on an entirely new operating system, Googlebook OS, rather than simply using Google’s Chrome OS software.

While Chrome OS has come on in leaps and bounds since its inception, Google’s lightweight operating system built around its Chrome web browser has plenty of limitations. While these limitations have helped keep hardware requirements and costs down, making Chromebooks excellent budget laptops, they can also be frustrating for users. It’s the main reason why I stopped using my Google Pixelbook Go, one of my favorite laptops ever, as my daily driver some years ago.

Googlebook OS combines the best things about Chrome OS, namely its lack of bloat, with Google’s other incredibly popular operating system, Android, to create something entirely new. Built on Linux, and making use of the higher hardware specs of Googlebooks, Googlebook OS is a fully-fledged desktop operating system that really feels like it can compete with Windows 11 and macOS.

Thanks to the OS's ability to run Android apps, Googlebooks will launch on October 5 with access to millions of apps and games via Google’s Play Store, and there will be a dedicated section of the Play Store for desktop apps. These apps won’t just be mobile Android apps clumsily expanded onto a larger screen, but more complex and capable apps that have been designed for Googlebooks with keyboard and touchpad controls. I imagine at launch that this library of desktop apps will be rather limited, but will hopefully expand quickly, especially if Googlebooks turn out to be a hit.

At the launch event, I saw how Googlebook OS fixes one of my biggest issues with Chrome OS. Apps for Chrome OS are usually very limited, sometimes requiring an internet connection to run. The Chrome web browser was the mobile version, which meant you couldn’t run extensions, a deal breaker for myself, as I have several extensions I need to run for my job.

So, one of the first things I did when playing around with a Googlebook was launch Chrome, and I’m happy to report that it’s the full desktop version, so extensions are supported.

Googlebook OS also has a fast and intuitive file browser app, with built-in AI that allows you to use natural language to search your files. In the example I was shown, you could search for ‘a photo with a dog in it’, and Googlebook OS will identify any photo which includes a dog, rather than just going off file names or tags. It’s the kind of responsive and easy-to-use search that Microsoft has long promised in Windows 11, but has never managed to nail. Google has made it look easy.

While Googlebook OS is a new operating system, the aim, according to Alex Kuscher Senior Director, Laptops and Tablets at Google, is to create “a laptop that feels familiar to Android users”.

That means an interface that, despite being built for desktops, looks a lot like Android on smartphones. It uses the same Material 3 Expressive interface, and widgets, menus and settings should be recognizable to anyone who's used a modern Android device. The fact that every Googlebook comes with a touchscreen means there should only be a small learning curve for Android users.

Of course, if you use a version of Android that’s heavily modified, such as with the OneUI interface found on Samsung devices, things won’t be quite as similar, as the Googlebook OS interface is very much based on the stock Android you find on Google’s own Pixel series of devices. Still, anyone who's used an Android device should find Googlebook OS easier to pick up and use compared to Windows or macOS… or even Chrome OS.

Googlebooks and Android devices will also work seamlessly with each other, so once paired, you’ll be able to access and launch apps and files from your smartphone on a Googlebook, even allowing you to carry on where you left off on one device when switching to another.

I saw this in action with a few apps, and it looked like it worked very well. It was intuitive and slick, and finally offers the kind of interoperability between mobile device and laptop that Android users have been wanting. If you’ve ever been jealous of how well MacBooks and iPhones work with each other as an Android user, then a Googlebook is definitely worth considering.

One thing to note is that, while you’ll be able to see and reply to text messages your Android phone receives on your Googlebook, you won’t be able to make and answer calls. A Google employee told me this is for security reasons; however, iPhone users can answer their iPhone through macOS, so if Apple has found a way to do this securely, I’m sure Google will figure it out as well. I was also assured that WearOS devices, such as the Pixel Watch 5, will get some sort of compatibility with Googlebooks as well, but that feature will come in the future.

Based on my time with the first tranche of Googlebooks, I've been impressed with the Apple-like way in which they work with Android devices. If anyone has tried the rather clumsy way Windows 11 works with Android, the way Googlebook OS handles things will be a revelation. Previously, only Samsung got close to this kind of ecosystem, but that relied on using Samsung apps and devices. The Googlebook OS way of doing things feels far more natural.

It's also hard to overstate how big a deal a new operating system to challenge the dominance of Windows (and to a lesser extent, macOS) on laptops is. Many people have been growing frustrated with Windows 11’s instability and bloat, and while Googlebook OS also features heaps of AI (a common complaint of Windows 11 these days), it does so in a less obtrusive way. It certainly feels like Googlebook OS was built to incorporate AI, rather than it being bolted on, as with Windows 11 (which, to be fair to Microsoft, was launched before AI really took off).

The Magic Pointer feature, for example, brings up Google’s Gemini AI with a shake of mouse cursor, and while I don’t think this is a killer feature, it’s at least easy to ignore if you don’t need it (and just as easy to use if you do).

New Googlebooks will come with 12 months of Gemini Spark — Google's personal AI agent — which is a nice added value, though I worry how much of Googlebook OS’ AI features will suddenly become unusable when those 12 months are up and you don’t resubscribe.

Also, while Googlebook OS feels lightweight thanks to the lack of preinstalled ‘bloatware’ and speed, it offers plenty of depth as well, with full Terminal access, support for Linux containers, and access to Google’s Antigravity tool for coding your own apps. The Create My Widget feature, currently in beta, lets users make their own desktop widgets using natural-language prompts.

So, it looks like Googlebook OS could be the best example yet of a lightweight operating system that doesn’t feel limiting for more advanced users. The integration between Googlebooks and Android devices is also impressive, and perhaps the thing that both Microsoft and Apple should be most worried about, as there are a lot of Android device owners looking for a laptop that works this well with their smartphone.

There’s no doubt that Googlebooks are going to be impressive laptops, and I left the event increasingly confident that pitching Googlebooks to compete with MacBook Airs (especially after Apple has raised the price of its laptops) rather than limiting them to budget laptops, is a canny move. We’ll be getting all of the new Googlebooks in for review soon at TechRadar, but from my early time with them, I would advise any Android owner who's currently thinking about buying a new laptop to hold fire until October 5.

It's time for TechRadar's annual tech awards, and this year we're doing it differently. For the first time, we have a complete set of categories where the winners are chosen 100% by you, the TechRadar readers.

The TechRadar Readers' Choice Awards 2026 comprises nearly 100 categories, but we know that not everyone is interested in voting in every one, so on this page you can vote in just our Computing and Gaming categories.

These include laptops, PC gaming peripherals, console accessories, monitors, gaming services and more. You can vote in the survey just below — or follow the links to see other specific categories, or to vote on the full list instead.

The shortlists were chosen by TechRadar's editors based on the best products we've tested or the most popular products of the year. You'll need to vote before 00:01am PST / 03:01am EST / 08:01am BST on Wednesday October 7th 2026 for it to be counted.

• All categories
• Phones & Cameras
• TV & Audio
• Fitness & Home Tech

Once the deadline has passed at 00:01am PST / 03:01am EST / 08:01am BST on Wednesday October 7th 2026, we'll tally your votes to find the winners in each category.

We'll announce the winners in our big TechRadar Awards 2026 Week, starting Monday October 19th. We'll reveal the winners of the Reader's Choice Awards, as well as the winners of our TechRadar Product of the Year Awards, which are chosen solely by our expert judges.

How many products will do the double? We'll be curious to see — but right now, all you can do is vote for what you think should win, so vote away!