❌

Reading view

There are new articles available, click to refresh the page.

Recommended readings on AI and privacy

Law professor and privacy law scholar Dan Solove has made two short essays available to everyone: The AI Inference Problem in Privacy Law AI inferences undermine privacy laws. Whether they recognize inferences or not, privacy laws are in a bind. Rethinking Privacy of the Mind:  Why Protecting Neural Data Is Insufficient Is protecting neural data...

Tajani data leak on the dark web: The Guarantor warns the media.

A breach involving a public figure prompted this press release from Italy’s data protection authority: Regarding the dissemination of personal data on the dark web relating to Vice President Antonio Tajani and his family members, the Italian Data Protection Authority warns media outlets, newspapers, websites, and platforms that the acquisition, dissemination, and republishing, by any...

States Target Sensitive Data, Location Data, and Data Brokers

Scott Hall and Meaghan Henderson of Coblentz Patch Duffy & Bass write: States continued to adopt more targeted privacy requirements in 2026, including new restrictions on precise geolocation and sensitive personal data and expanded requirements for data brokers. These laws are important even for businesses that have already determined whether they are subject to each...

How Does Delaware’s New Data Breach Statute Impact Health Care Delivery System?

Bruce Armon, Evan Foster, and Jazmine B. King of Saul Ewing LLP write: On September 2, 2026, HB 381 was signed into law and amends Delaware’s data breach notification statute effective immediately. The new Delaware breach law includes a 60-day notice provision to the Delaware Attorney General, narrows the safe harbor for institutions covered by...

Oregon Attorney General Rayfield Leads States in $220M Settlement With GM Over Sale of Drivers’ Private Data

Oregon will receive more than $10.4 million, and GM must now get drivers’ clear permission before collecting or sharing their driving and location data Attorney General Dan Rayfield today announced that General Motors will pay $220 million to settle allegations that it sold drivers’ private driving behavior and location data to data brokers, who then...

Oregon Attorney General Rayfield Leads States in $220M Settlement With GM Over Sale of Drivers’ Private Data

Oregon will receive more than $10.4 million, and GM must now get drivers’ clear permission before collecting or sharing their driving and location data Attorney General Dan Rayfield today announced that General Motors will pay $220 million to settle allegations that it sold drivers’ private driving behavior and location data to data brokers, who then...

California Enacts SB 690: What Happens to Website-Tracking Litigation Now?

Odia Kagan of FoxRothschild writes: On September 30, 2026, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed Senate Bill 690, significantly narrowing one of the theories driving California website-tracking litigation. The law limits private lawsuits alleging that tracking technologies used on websites and applications violate the pen register and trap-and-trace provisions of the California Invasion of Privacy Act,...

Source

Trump White House Told DOJ to Push for Abortion Pill Ban After Midterms; State AGs Sue Now to Invalidate Shield Laws

Attacks on a woman’s right to choose continue by the Republicans. Expect even more attacks after the midterms. Stephen Preger reports: The Trump administration is intentionally slow-rolling efforts to restrict abortion pill access until after the midterms. Once they’re over, “the gloves will be off,” according to one anti-abortion advocate who spoke with The Washington...

Source

California Enacts Several Minors’ Privacy and Safety Laws

Lindsey Tonsager, Jenna Zhang, and Irene Kim of Covington and Burling summarize some recent bills signed into law. From their article: Companion Chatbots. Adam’s Law (SB 1119) requires operators of a “companion chatbot” to determine the age of users consistent with the Digital Age Assurance Act and imposes a series of obligations before making a...

Source

Researchers use AI to find widespread software decoder flaw 

Researchers said they used Anthropic’s Claude and OpenAI’s Codex to identify a damaging flaw embedded in a popular software decoding tool that could leave major internet platforms, enterprise services, and web frameworks vulnerable to data theft and remote access.

The vulnerability, nicknamed HEIF Heist, refers to the malware’s ability to trigger memory corruption errors in affected software, allowing the attacker to pilfer sensitive data from its victims. In a report published Thursday, the researchers laid out the potential damage an attacker could cause, including gaining access to internal OpenAI repositories, leaking user files, access tokens, and other sensitive data for online services like Amazon Web Services, and gaining remote code execution privileges across a range of online services, including Meta’s core product suite, GitHub Enterprise servers and open-source internet forum Discourse.

“Even when Remote Code Execution isn’t immediately achievable, the attack primitives may still allow arbitrary heap disclosure, letting an attacker ‘heist’ in-memory data such as other users’ data and environment variables,” wrote Hacktron researchers Harsh Jaiswal, Mohan SRK, Rahul Maini and Sudhanshu Rajbhar.

The researchers relied heavily on AI systems, including frontier models from OpenAI and Anthropic, to conduct their research. Attribution for the research is described as being “led” by the Hacktron human researchers “assisted by Hacktron Harness, GPT-5.6 Sol, and Opus 5.”

According to the research, the attack exploited the way that code parsing tools in many popular software decoders — specifically libheif and libde265, used to parse C and C++ software — process certain image files.

By uploading HEIF, HEIC and AVIF image files corrupted with malicious code, the attacker could bypass most of the victim’s application layer defenses, in many cases achieving remote code execution privileges for accounts or products tied to major AI and tech brands.   

While the latest version of libheif has been patched, the researchers said “any deployment lacking the latest upstream security patches is potentially vulnerable.”

In one incident detailed in a Sept. 13 blog, Jaiswal, Maini, and Hacktron researcher Mohan Pedhapati described how chaining two vulnerabilities, including an image parser flaw, could compromise OpenAI employee accounts.

With access to the compromised accounts, researchers could reach OpenAI’s internal repositories. As a proof of concept, they opened a pull request in the company’s “monorepo,” a centralized library where code is shared across projects, using the employee’s Codex credentials. 

According to a timeline provided by the researchers, the flaw was discovered on July 25 and patched within days. They said the entire attack, from discovering the initial vulnerability to gaining access to the repositories, took less than 72 hours. OpenAI paid them a bug bounty of $6,500 for their work.

Given that AI models are increasingly integrated into enterprise and personal networks, an attacker exploiting HEIF Heist could have accessed far more than just OpenAI’s systems and data.

“Until two months ago, a user or OpenAI employee logging into OpenAI’s own help forum could have had their ChatGPT and Codex accounts taken over,” the researchers wrote. “Since people can connect various services to Codex and ChatGPT, the scope of what we could theoretically access was huge, including GitHub, Slack and emails.”

CyberScoop has reached out to OpenAI for comment on the research and additional information.

At the same time, the researchers said the attack paths they found were not particularly easy or efficient to exploit.

“Exploitation requires fingerprinting the target version and tailoring the payload images,” the blog stated. “Some of our RCE attempts landed only after thousands of image uploads. That said, an AI agentic approach with a frontier model like GPT-5.6 Sol cut exploit development time down to roughly 1 to 3 days from initial probe to remote RCE. A motivated attacker can convert a vulnerable upload endpoint into RCE or an info leak.”

The post Researchers use AI to find widespread software decoder flaw  appeared first on CyberScoop.

Companies Make It Hard to Access Your Personal Data Under State Privacy Laws, CR Finds

Derek Kravitz reports: Nearly every time you buy something online or sign up for a loyalty program, you leave behind personal information that can be collected, shared, and sold among companies including advertisers, retailers, and data brokers. This kind of information is sometimes used to charge consumers more for a range of products and services,...

Source

Oklahoma women sue after being denied abortions for fatal fetal diagnoses

Samantha Rupe reports: The Center for Reproductive Rights has filed a lawsuit challenging Oklahoma abortion laws on behalf of two women who were denied abortion care after receiving fatal fetal diagnoses. Magon Hoffman and Sheena Hamlin said they were forced to leave Oklahoma to obtain care after learning their pregnancies would not result in surviving...

Source

AI in the Therapist’s Chair? California Says No—and Backs It Up With $10,000 Penalties

Meghan O’Connor and Candice Andalia of Quarles write: California is drawing a hard line: artificial intelligence may schedule a therapy appointment, but it may not conduct one. Licensed professionals who allow AI to make independent therapeutic decisions, interact directly with patients, or detect emotions and mental states may face fines of up to $10,000 per...

Source

New California Bill Would Prohibit Apps From Changing User Privacy Settings Without Consent

Odia Kagan of FoxRothschild writes: If a user sets a privacy preference, an operating system or app cannot change that setting without the user’s explicit consent, says new bill, AB 2561, that passed the California legislature. A “Privacy setting” means any user-configurable option within an application’s privacy, or similarly labeled, menu that governs the application’s...

Source

Horizon Scan: Children’s Online Safety and Privacy (EU and Beyond)

Dan Cooper, Jadzia Pierce, Kristof Van Quathem, Atli Stannard, Anna Sophia Oberschelp de Meneses, Diego Bonomo, John Bowers, Sam Jungyun Choi, and Laura Schukraft of Covington and Burling write: In recent months, children’s online safety and privacy have moved to the top of the EU’s digital agenda. The European Commission is expected to outline its...

Source

Delaware Consumer Privacy and Data-Breach Law Updates

Joseph J. Lazzarotti of JacksonLewis writes: On September 2, 2026, Delaware’s Governor signed House Bill (HB) 380 and HB 381. HB 380 amends the Delaware Personal Data Privacy Act (DPDPA), which was enacted in 2023 and became effective January 1, 2025. HB 381 separately amends Delaware’s computer security breach notification law. In short, what changes...

Source

Australia Privacy Update – Proposed privacy law reform

Nicholas Boyle, Claire Kermond, and Alexandra Moore of White & Case write: On August 31, 2026, the Australian Government released a Privacy Reform – Consultation Paper (the Consultation Paper) and an exposure draft of the Privacy Amendment (Personal Data Protection Bill) 2026 (Exposure Draft) detailing proposed changes to the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) (the Privacy...

Source

California Legislature Advances Bill to Strengthen Deletion Rights

The California Privacy Protection Agency announced some good news on LinkedIn: Good news! CalPrivacy sponsored bill SB 923 (Becker), also known as the Expanding Privacy Rights Act, officially passed the California Legislature. The bill will expand the right to delete to cover all personal information collected about a consumer no matter the source of the...
❌