Two men from Western Australia were arrested and charged Wednesday for their alleged roles in TeamPCP, a notorious cybercrime group responsible for inserting malicious code into widely used open-source software in a campaign that compromised more than 1,000 organizations worldwide.

Australian authorities did not formally name the men, but Australian media identified them as Ruben Ian Thomson, 21, and Louis Michael Gaebler, 23. Police arrested both after searching properties, seizing electronic devices for forensic testing in the process. 

Thomson faces eight charges, including four counts of unauthorized data modification, dealing in criminal proceeds worth $100,000 or more, and refusal to comply with an order to hand over device passwords. Gaebler faces six related counts. 

The Australian Federal Police, which worked with the Western Australia Police Force (WAPF) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, allege both men were part of a syndicate engaged in “data intrusion, identity crime and cryptocurrency-based money laundering.” Investigators said further arrests have not been ruled out.

“These men are allegedly members of the cybercriminal group TeamPCP, whose malicious code potentially compromised more than a thousand organizations worldwide,” said Brett Leatherman, assistant director of the FBI’s Cyber Division. “We are proud to work with the Australian Federal Police and the Western Australia Police Force to impose cost on criminal actors and combat the growing threat of software supply-chain attacks.”

Months of havoc

TeamPCP has been one of the most active cybercriminal groups in 2026. In late February, TeamPCP exploited a misconfigured workflow in Trivy, Aqua Security’s widely used vulnerability scanner, and stole a service-account token. Aqua replaced its credentials but missed some.

On March 19, the group pushed a malicious Trivy release through every distribution channel at once, placing malware inside thousands of automated build pipelines. Downstream victims included the European Commission and GitHub.

Investigators estimate the campaign exposed more than 500,000 credentials, removed at least 300 gigabytes of data and produced global cleanup costs in the hundreds of millions of dollars.

In May, a piece of self-replicating malware known as “mini Shai-Hulud” targeted prominent software libraries, including TanStack, UiPath, and MistralAI, embedding credential-stealing code into development tools downloaded millions of times a week.

Earlier this month, Oligo Security shared exclusive research with CyberScoop that dated the group’s attacks as far back as 2020. 

Cat photos and GitHub accounts

Alongside the arrests, researchers at the Canadian threat intelligence firm Flare published research that traced Ruben Thomson’s online presence. 

Working from a GitHub alias, DeadCatx3, the researchers found a bug-bounty account under the name Ruben Thomson and a profile listing masscan[.]cloud, a domain that served as command server for mini Shai-Hulud. From there, a password tied to a school email address led researchers to databases of stolen credentials and a trove of accounts: a personal Google account, a TikTok profile under Thomson’s name, and a Steam gaming page showing a cat seated before several monitors. The cat image appeared on a TeamPCP Telegram identity. Flare assessed with high confidence that Thomson ran the group and said it confirmed the findings with law enforcement.

Charlie Eriksen, lead malware researcher at Aikido Security, called the arrests a “relief,” but warned that the actions won’t mean the threat toward open-source software suddenly vanishes.

“The conditions that produced them haven’t gone away, so there will be another TeamPCP,” he told CyberScoop in an email. “We just don’t know their name yet.”

The two men will appear in Australian court Thursday. 

The post Two alleged TeamPCP members arrested and charged after months of software supply-chain chaos appeared first on CyberScoop.

TeamPCP, the threat actor behind an unrelenting flurry of attacks on open-source software this year, has been active much longer than previously thought, according to research Oligo Security shared exclusively with CyberScoop. 

The threat actor, which gained notoriety and has captivated threat hunters as it compromised and injected malicious code into more than 1,000 software packages in less than four months earlier this year, was also responsible for attacks dating back to 2020, Oligo Security found. 

The security vendor’s research team found multiple attacks that bear the markings of TeamPCP, including a late 2025 campaign involving the exploitation of a ShadowRay vulnerability that resulted in the first self-propogating botnet running on hijacked AI infrastructure.

Evidence uncovered during that investigation into the ShadowRay 2.0 campaign was linked to more historical attacks originating from the same IPs, domains and other infrastructure TeamPCP used in attacks that captured widespread attention earlier this year. 

“The scariest thing in this campaign is the speed at which the payloads evolved and changed and adapted to the environment they run in. We saw changes in the speed that we’re not used to seeing in these kinds of attacks. They’re usually slow, careful,” said Uri Katz, director of research at Oligo Security. “This was clearly with the help of AI — the payloads changed rapidly to adjust and change to the environment that they were trying to attack.”

One of the domains that Oligo Security identified in July 2025 was in the profile of TeamPCP’s official GitHub account, said Avi Lumelsky, AI security researcher at Oligo Security. “It’s public, they’re not even trying to hide their identity,” he said. 

From there, Oligo linked TeamPCP to activity tracked under multiple names, including TA-NATALSTATUS and IronErn, spanning from 2020 to late 2025. Much of that activity was traced to the same IPs, domain names, a file server and command-and-control server, researchers said. 

TeamPCP emerged publicly as a brand in late 2025. Soon after, “TeamPCP started to go really broad and do campaigns, which are much more noisy,” said Gal Elbaz, co-founder and CTO at Oligo Security. 

Widespread adoption of AI and TeamPCP’s use of the technology supported this growth as the threat actor built a brand, got more active on social media and boasted publicly about its activities and claimed victims.

“The ability to control the infrastructure and orchestrate the attack with AI was also super new, and I’m sure it helps them,” Elbaz said. 

“All of the companies in the world are in this race to adopt AI because they are afraid their business will die, and they understand, of course, the opportunity. But it’s also what gives the attacker this power to go into it,” he added. “If you don’t really have visibility in what’s going on there or how it behaves, that’s exactly what attackers are after.”

TeamPCP’s more recent attacks have capitalized on new security gaps created by developers’ increasing reliance on AI and the automated systems companies use to deploy code. The threat actor is also consistently wrecking the open-source frameworks and software packages these systems rely on. 

“Most AI infrastructure is open source by design because nobody has the manpower and money to develop everything from scratch,” Lumelsky said. 

“We love open source. We use many of these products ourselves, but it’s all about reading the documentation, and I think many of these tools place the responsibility of using it right and security on the user, and developers are not used to these new kinds of animals,” he added. “That’s why the trust can be exploited at scale.”

As it uncovered a long operational history spanning multiple campaigns, Oligo Security has gained more confidence in understanding how TeamPCP operates. It also means TeamPCP was likely involved in other attacks that haven’t been attributed to it yet or attacks that haven’t been detected. 

“There’s a lot more out there that we haven’t caught or been able to prove up until now,” Elbaz said.

The post Open-source software’s archenemy TeamPCP goes back further than anyone thought appeared first on CyberScoop.