Huawei says it’s made a 100 percent Chinese PC
BAE Systems says no data was extracted and no PII was breached in the incident that disrupted US bankruptcy court notices for weeks.
The post BAE Says No Data Extracted in Incident Hitting Bankruptcy Courts appeared first on SecurityWeek.
A Florida judge ruled this week that ex-Overstock CEO Patrick Byrne is not liable in a lawsuit brought by a Dominion Voting Systems executive over a film that accuses the former electronic voting hardware and software company executive of saying he “made sure” that Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump wouldn’t win reelection in 2020.
The lawsuit, brought in 2022 by Eric Coomer, a former director of product strategy and security at Dominion Voting Systems, concerns comments made in a 2020 film produced by Byrne titled “The Deep Rig.”
In the film, which alleges a conspiracy to manipulate 2020 election results in favor of Democrat Joe Biden, a man identified as Joseph Oltmann claimed he listened to a conference call led by organizers of “Antifa,” wherein another participant mentioned that “Eric” “The Dominion Guy” was also on the call.
In the film, Oltmann says a man identified as “Eric” told others on the call that Trump wouldn’t win reelection because he had “made sure of it.” Coomer denies taking part in any such call, and filed a lawsuit against Byrne and seven other individuals and entities for defamation.
U.S. District Judge Tom Barber’s decision did not address most of the substantive claims in the lawsuit, such as Byrne’s ultimate legal responsibility for the statements by Oltmann that made it into the film.
Because the lawsuit was originally filed in Colorado, it must meet a state law requirement for defamation claims involving matters of public concern. Coomer must show “clear and convincing evidence” that Byrne or others involved in making the film knew the claims were false and defamatory, or acted with reckless disregard for the truth.
“Where the challenged speech involves a matter of public concern, as it undeniably does here, the plaintiff also bears the burden of proving, by clear and convincing evidence, that the challenged statement is materially false and was made with actual malice,” wrote Barber in his opinion.
The standard is not whether a reasonable person would have investigated the claims before airing them, but whether the defendant “in fact entertained serious doubts as to the truth of [the] publication, or was highly aware of its probable falsity.”
In this case, Barber said it’s not impossible to clear that standard for public figures, but under Colorado law, Coomer would have a hard time providing clear and convincing evidence that Byrne “in fact subjectively disbelieved or had serious doubts about Oltmann’s story.”
Barber further wrote that technology has given “a powerful microphone” and large followings to people who would otherwise be dismissed as “kooks” and conspiracy theorists. These people make statements that are “objectively and demonstrably wrong” but who hold firm to their core beliefs because they “genuinely and sincerely believe what they say with every fiber of their being, even when objective evidence may suggest otherwise.”
Still, he said the current language and meaning of the Colorado law is clear, suggesting it was a matter for higher courts or legislators to clarify or change.
“Under the actual malice standard, unless it can be proven that the speaker subjectively believed his or her statements to be untrue, the law imposes no liability,” Barber wrote. “That is a policy choice that might deserve reexamination by the appropriate decision makers – the United States Supreme Court and the Colorado courts.”
Byrne’s attorney, Peter Ticktin, called the ruling a “victory” in a statement to CyberScoop.
“This is a substantial victory for Patriot Patrick Byrne and for the principles at stake in this case,” Ticktin said. “The court’s decision speaks for itself. We are pleased that the facts and applicable law resulted in summary judgment in our client’s favor.”
Coomer sued Byrne in his personal capacity, and Dominion Voting Systems was not a party to the lawsuit.
The voting machine giant was awarded more than $1.8 billion in combined legal settlements over the past two years from Fox News, Newsmax and MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell, all of whom made allegations that Dominion voting machines were used to maliciously flip or alter votes.
The post Lawsuit against Ex-Overstock CEO tied to 2020 election film falls apart over question of ‘actual malice’ appeared first on CyberScoop.
Opaque Systems has developed technology that lets AI systems use sensitive data while keeping it protected by the underlying hardware.
The post Anthropic Acquires Confidential AI Startup Opaque Systems appeared first on SecurityWeek.
A cybersecurity incident at BAE Systems has halted the production and delivery of bankruptcy notices for every federal bankruptcy court in the United States, disrupting a core administrative function of the judiciary with no announced date for restoration.
The Bankruptcy Noticing Center, known as the BNC, produces and transmits notices in bankruptcy cases nationwide. BAE Systems, a defense contractor, operates the center’s systems and websites on behalf of the federal judiciary. In a statement published Thursday, the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts said the incident affected BAE’s information technology and the websites supporting the center’s operations.
The office said BAE is investigating and working to restore operations.
“We are aware of a security incident that is isolated to the BNC system and have taken immediate steps to address it,” a BAE Systems spokesperson told CyberScoop. “No other systems have been affected.”
The disruption has taken the center’s websites offline, including bnc.uscourts.gov, bankruptcynotices.uscourts.gov and notices.uscourts.gov, along with the National Creditor Registration Service. It has stopped the production and distribution of notices, paper and electronic, since Oct. 9.
As of Friday, those websites were still offline.
Notices of the incident first started this week when a note was posted Tuesday on the U.S. Bankruptcy court website, calling it a “nationwide service interruption” with no mention of cyberactivity. The Administrative Office’s Oct. 15 statement was the first to use the words cybersecurity incident.
Neither announcement identified a cause, said whether information was accessed, or gave an estimate for restoration.
Clerk of Court Joe Falzone said in the announcement that courts are still taking new filings, opening cases and processing paperwork. People who need to serve documents can look up creditor and party addresses by running searches in the courts’ electronic filing system, then compare the two lists to make sure nothing is missing. But the notice warned that those lists might not include addresses that people registered through the BNC’s Electronic Bankruptcy Noticing program or the National Creditor Registration Service. Some people who are supposed to receive notice might not appear in the records.
The incident would mark the second in as many years to affect U.S. Courts. In 2025, there was a major breach of the federal judiciary’s electronic case filing system.
The Administrative Office said it has been in communication with the affected courts as BAE Systems continues its investigation.
UPDATE, 10/16/2026, 1:45 p.m.: This story has been updated with comment from BAE Systems.
The post Cybersecurity incident at BAE Systems disrupts US bankruptcy court system appeared first on CyberScoop.
Clint Curtis, the registrar for voters in Shasta County, Calif. said he plans to hire convicted felon and election denialist Tina Peters as one of his top deputies.
Curtis said he plans to hire Peters next month as an assistant registrar, according to local news outlets, which cited text exchanges with Curtis.
CyberScoop has reached out to Shasta County’s elections office for comment.
If Peters is hired, it would represent a marriage between a conspiracy-minded election official from another state and an equally distrusting electorate.
Donald Trump won Shasta County approximately two-thirds of voters in the county in all three presidential elections dating back to 2016. Its conservative residents have adopted Trump’s rhetoric that election fraud, voting machine hacks, noncitizen voting and other problems plagued the system, and have turned their anger at local officials.
Cathy Darling Allen, Shasta County’s former registrar of voters, told CyberScoop in 2024 that she retired after decades of administering elections in the county due to persistent attacks and harassment from voters who embraced baseless election fraud conspiracy theories.
Peters, a former Mesa County, Colo. election official, had been serving a 9-year sentence for seven felonies, including identity theft, breaking into an election office, disabling surveillance cameras, and stealing voting system software.
Peters’ prosecutor, Colorado’s state clemency advisory board, and Mesa County officials have all defended her sentence and described her as entirely unrepentant for her crimes.
Election experts have called Peters’ theft of voting system software one of the most serious breaches of election systems in history. She shared the stolen code with conservative activists, and the code eventually surfaced online.
Governor Jared Polis, a Democrat, commuted Peters’ sentence earlier this year, citing pressure from the Trump administration and arguing that her punishment violated her First Amendment rights. In doing so, Polis intervened before an appeals court could decide whether Peters deserved a reduced sentence.
“She may continue making claims about elections that I believe are false,” Polis wrote in a May Substack post defending the decision. “She may continue promoting ideas that I strongly disagree with. I hope she doesn’t. But in America, people are not sent to prison for expressing political views, however misguided those views may be.”
In response to questions about Peters, Polis’ press office referred CyberScoop to the Colorado Department of Corrections.
Department of Corrections spokesperson Alondra Gonzalez told CyberScoop in an email that as part of her parole conditions, Peters is required to get a job or participate in a full time educational or vocational program and reside in Colorado. Parolees can request to transfer to another state, but those requests would be subject to rules and procedures under the Interstate Compact for Adult Offender Supervision and require approval from both states.
Gonzalez told CyberScoop that the department has not received a request for an interstate transfer from Peters at this time.
The Shasta County board of supervisors formally censured Curtis earlier this month following investigations by the county and outside consultant firm The Oppenheimer Group found he was verbally abusive or physically threatening toward staff.
At an Aug. 11 public meeting, Shasta County Supervisor Matt Plummer cited more than 700 pages of evidence and more than half a dozen eyewitnesses.
The investigations included claims that Curtis at times threatened to “punch,” “slap in the face,” “kill” or “execute” his subordinates. Another claim alleges Curtis once threatened to remove a door where an employee was allegedly hiding from him and have the person pulled out by their hair.
Plummer prefaced his comments by saying the board’s action is “not about election integrity” and that Curtis retains all of his authority to carry out budgeted election administration for the county.
“This is about determining when a department head allegedly and through two investigations, has substantiated allegations of violating personnel codes, the codes that guide how we as a county intend to interact with our employees, what do we do about it?” Plummer said.
Senators Alex Padilla, D-Calif., and Adam Schiff, D-Calif., wrote to California Secretary of State Shirley Weber to express their “grave concern” over the possibility that Peters would have access to state election systems.
“If Shasta County puts Ms. Peters in a position to again violate election laws following her convictions, county taxpayers could be burdened with unwelcomed and potentially hefty expenses,” Padilla and Schiff wrote. “If county officials proceed with this misguided plan, we request that you provide the maximum oversight possible to ensure that Ms. Peters does not improperly access ballots, voting systems, or sensitive information that could impact the rights and privacy of the over 100,000 registered voters in Shasta County in violation of…state or federal election law.”
The post A California county wants to hire Tina Peters to help run its elections appeared first on CyberScoop.

This blog will be referencing the ICS/OT Backdoors & Breaches expansion deck created by BHIS and Dragos. We will be reviewing the ICS-focused Initial Compromise cards that are used to simulate a cyber incident and suggest potential mitigations to what is presented.
The post ICS Hard Knocks: Mitigations to Scenarios Found in ICS/OT Backdoors & Breaches appeared first on Black Hills Information Security, Inc..

by Austin Kaiser // Intern Hacking a satellite is not a new thing. Satellites have been around since 1957. The first satellite launched was called Sputnik 1 and was launched […]
The post Satellite Hacking appeared first on Black Hills Information Security, Inc..

Raymond Felch // Preface: I began my exploration of reverse-engineering firmware a few weeks back (see “JTAG – Micro-Controller Debugging“), and although I made considerable progress finding and identifying the […]
The post How to Hack Hardware using UART appeared first on Black Hills Information Security, Inc..