❌

Normal view

There are new articles available, click to refresh the page.
Before yesterdayMain stream

First, we fire all our lawyers …

15 September 2025 at 03:44
LEGAL BRIEF By Max Stul Oppenheimer, Esq. Not so fast, Mr. Shakespeare. Before you show your lawyer the door, let’s see whether artificial intelligence can provide the advice you need to stay out of trouble. We ran a series of experiments with two widely used, free (after all, the goal was to avoid paying legal […]

Embracing chaos

4 August 2025 at 03:43
LEGAL BRIEF By Max Stul Oppenheimer, Esq. Two recent and seemingly unrelated events show a point of agreement between the legislature and the judiciary β€” chaos is good. In Trump v. CASA, the Supreme Court limited the power of federal district judges (the lowest rung on the federal court ladder) to issue orders that would […]

Oregon Amends Its Comprehensive Privacy Statute

By: Dissent
2 July 2025 at 15:08
Lindsey Tonsager, Libbie Canter, Jayne Ponder, and Sierra Stubbs of Covington and Burling write: Following the approach taken by the Kentucky and Connecticut legislatures this spring, Oregon hasΒ amendedΒ itsΒ comprehensive privacy statuteΒ to implement changes to the law.Β  Specifically, the amendment extends the statutory cure period to July 1, 2026, but this extension is limited to certain controllers.Β ...

Wisconsin Supreme Court’s Liberal Majority Strikes Down 176-Year-Old Abortion Ban

By: Dissent
2 July 2025 at 14:13
Todd Richmond reports: The Wisconsin Supreme Court’s liberal majority struck down the state’s 176-year-old abortion ban on Wednesday, ruling 4-3 that it was superseded by a newer state law that criminalizes abortions only after a fetus can survive outside the womb. State lawmakers adopted the ban in 1849, making it a felony when anyone other...
❌
❌