Normal view
New macOS ClickFix attack silently mounts DMGs to push infostealer
Apple fixes Beats Studio Buds flaw that let hackers spy on conversations
Respecting customers
New Apple feature automatically changes your compromised passwords
June 1, 2026 Apple Updates
Apple open-sources quantum-resistant encryption code
Apple has released quantum-resistant cryptographic code and the mathematical verification tools it developed to prove the codeโs correctness, making them publicly available for independent review and broader use across the industry.
The release includes implementations of two quantum-secure algorithms, ML-KEM and ML-DSA, along with the formal verification libraries and tools Apple created to validate their accuracy. The company also published detailed documentation of its verification methodology, which it describes as achieving the strongest known correctness results for any widely deployed production implementation of these algorithms.
The quantum-secure algorithms are integrated into corecrypto, Appleโs cryptographic library used across its operating systems. The library handles encryption, decryption, hashing, and digital signatures on over 2.5 billion active devices. Apple began deploying quantum-resistant encryption in iMessage in 2024 and has expanded the technology to VPN services and TLS networking protocols.
One of the tools released is the companyโs Cryptol-to-Isabelle translator, which converts cryptographic models between formal languages, along with supporting libraries needed to reproduce the results. Formal verification uses mathematical proofs to show that code works correctly for all possible inputs. Apple translated its code into Cryptol, a formal language developed by Galois, then into Isabelle, a proof assistant from the University of Cambridge and The Technical University of Munich, to prove both matched the official standards. Apple has used Isabelle previously to verify hardware cryptographic components.
The verification process uncovered errors that conventional testing would have missed. Researchers found a missing computational step in the ML-DSA code that would have silently broken digital signatures. If this bug had reached production, messages in iMessage may have appeared authenticated when they actually werenโt, leaving users unaware their communications lacked proper security.
Even with these tools, Apple acknowledged that it still depends on conventional cryptographic testing and evaluation is needed for assurance. Formal verification can catch errors that traditional testing simply cannot find. Testing works by trying many scenarios, but with complex cryptographic code, there are too many possible inputs to test exhaustively. Subtle bugs can hide in the gaps between test cases and never trigger a warning. Formal verification, by contrast, uses mathematics to prove correctness across all possible inputs at once.
However, Appleโs team writes that it couldnโt formally verify every single aspect of their code with the tools available, so they combined approaches: formal verification for core mathematical correctness, conventional testing for aspects formal methods couldnโt cover, and careful evaluation of how all the pieces work together. Apple argues this hybrid approach provides the most robust security for critical cryptographic software.
โBased on our work to date, we believe that the strongest assurance possible comes from combining formal verification with conventional methods and critically evaluating the end-to-end results,โ the blog post reads.
Furthermore, the blog states that Apple selected ML-KEM and ML-DSA from among several standardized quantum-resistant algorithms because they best matched the companyโs requirements for security, performance, and compact parameters. The algorithms address the threat posed by future quantum computers, which could potentially break the encryption methods currently protecting digital communications.
More information can be found on Appleโs corecrypto GitHub page.ย
The post Apple open-sources quantum-resistant encryption code appeared first on CyberScoop.
-
SecurityWeek RSS Feed
- Apple Rejected 2 Million App Store Submissions in 2025 for Security and Fraud Prevention
Apple Rejected 2 Million App Store Submissions in 2025 for Security and Fraud Prevention
The company blocked over 1.1 billion accounts and $2.2 billion in potentially fraudulent transactions.
The post Apple Rejected 2 Million App Store Submissions in 2025 for Security and Fraud Prevention appeared first on SecurityWeek.
Apple blocked over $11 billion in App Store fraud in 6 years
Blocking AI in Browsers
Microsoft blames macOS update for undismissible Teams location prompts
Android to iPhone: Willโs journey
Major tech manufacturer Foxconn confirms cyberattack hit North American factories
Foxconn, one of the worldโs largest manufacturers of electronics sold by major tech vendors, is recovering from a cyberattack that disrupted some of the companyโs factories in North America.
Nitrogen, a ransomware group thatโs known for targeting organizations in the manufacturing, construction and technology sectors, claimed responsibility for the attack on its data leak site and said it stole 8 terabytes of data spanning more than 11 million files.ย
The threat group posted screenshots of some of the allegedly stolen data and claimed it compromised โconfidential instructions, projects and drawings from Intel, Apple, Google, Dell, Nvidia and many other projects.โย
Foxconn is famously known as the primary assembler of Apple iPhones. Apple and the other companies allegedly impacted by the attack did not respond to a request for comment.
A spokesperson for Foxconn confirmed some of its factories in North America suffered a cyberattack, and said its cybersecurity team immediately responded to the breach by implementing additional โmeasures to ensure the continuity of production and delivery.โ
The spokesperson did not answer questions about when the attack occurred or what systems or data was impacted, but noted that โaffected factories are currently resuming normal productionโ as of Tuesday.ย
Nitrogen was first observed in 2023, using ALPHV, one of the most prevalent ransomware variants at that time, Cynthia Kaiser, senior vice president at Halcyonโs Ransomware Research Center, told CyberScoop. The group started using stolen code from Conti, another formerly prolific ransomware variant, in 2024 to build its own custom attack tools to hit Windows and VMware server environments, she added.
The threat group has most recently focused on companies in the manufacturing and technology sectors. โHowever, the most recent cases of claims by Nitrogen do not include a working file listing on the leak site and include mostly older images of files,โ Kaiser said. โThis raises questions about whether Nitrogen is inflating data-theft claims in an attempt to pressure victims into paying higher ransoms.โ
Foxconn hasnโt described the nature of the attack or confirmed the existence of a ransom demand.ย
Ismael Valenzuela, vice president of threat research and intelligence at Arctic Wolf Labs, said Nitrogen follows a โconsistent playbook, stealing data before encrypting systems so they have leverage on multiple fronts, combining operational disruption with the threat of sensitive information being exposed.โ
The threat groupโs tactics indicate itโs not opportunistic, but rather โoperating with a defined model, focusing on organizations that are easier to access but still critical enough to drive pressure and payment,โ Valenzuela added.ย
Foxconn, also known as Hon Hai Precision Industry with headquarters in Taiwan, is among the worldโs largest companies with $259 billion in revenue last year, the company said. Foxconnโs North American footprint includes multiple factories in Mexico, Wisconsin, Ohio, Texas, Virginia and Indiana.
The post Major tech manufacturer Foxconn confirms cyberattack hit North American factories appeared first on CyberScoop.
May 13, 2026 Apple update
Google and Amnesty International teamed up to make it harder for spyware vendors to hide
Google launched a feature for Android phones Tuesday for dedicated forensic logs about intrusions from sophisticated attacks like those by spyware vendors, in what design partners at Amnesty International hailed as an important first.
The tech giant has been ramping up the new feature, Intrusion Logging, since last year, and has now begun rolling it out.
โThe new intrusion logging feature promises to be a major aid to digital forensics researchers undertaking investigations into sophisticated attacks on Android devices,โ Amnesty International said in a Tuesday technical briefing. โThis is the first time a major device vendor has released a feature specifically to enhance the ability to forensically detect and respond to advanced digital threats.โ
To date, independent investigators have relied on records and often short-lived log files that werenโt meant for forensic use, and Amnesty said surveillance groups have grown increasingly aware of those forensic efforts. Intrusion Logging, a feature of Android Advanced Protection Mode, is designed specifically to keep track of possible intrusions for forensic purposes. It keeps records of security incidents like device unlocking, physical access and spyware installation and removal.
Googleโs annual security and privacy update for Android phones mentions the feature and its development with Amnesty International, Reporters Without Borders and others. It also touts new protections against banking scam calls, other features for detecting suspicious activity on Android phones, additional privacy safeguards and more.
The firm has been working on the feature since announcing it last year.
โIntrusion Logging enables persistent and privacy-preserving forensics logging to allow for investigation of devices in the event of a suspected compromise,โ wrote Eugene Liderman, director of Android security and privacy.
Intrusion Logging joins an expanding slate of features from tech companies to fight sophisticated attacks like those from commercial spyware, among them Appleโs Lockdown Mode and Memory Integrity Enforcement and WhatsAppโs Strict Account Settings.
Intrusion Logging โpromises to help shift the balance to the advantage of defenders, providing civil society investigators with the key evidence needed to detect and expose some of the most advanced attacks facing journalists and activists,โ said Donncha ร Cearbhaill, head of the Amnesty International Security Lab, โWith Intrusion Logging Google is the first major vendor to proactively address to challenge of detecting advanced attacks on device. By making more consensual forensic data available for researchers, we can make life more difficult for attackers and help civil society seek accountability when their devices are unlawfully targeted by spyware and mobile data extraction tools.โ
The feature has some limitations, though, Amnesty said in its technical briefing. It requires Android 16 and is only available for now on Pixel devices; the device has to be linked to a Google account, and the logs may include sensitive information, like browser navigation history, so secure sharing of the logs is important.
The logs may also be deletable by attackers, ร Cearbhaill told CyberScoop, but he said he understands there are plans to strengthen protections against that in future versions. And lots of attacks would be detectable in the logs where attackers wouldnโt necessarily have the root access needed to try to delete logs, he said.
To enable Intrusion Logging, users need to be using Android Advanced Protection Mode, and can find the feature at Settings > Security & privacy > Advanced Protection > Intrusion Logging. If users suspect some kind of security incident, theyโll need to export and share the logs with a forensic analyst.
The post Google and Amnesty International teamed up to make it harder for spyware vendors to hide appeared first on CyberScoop.
Patch Tuesday, May 2026 Edition
Artificial intelligence platforms may be just as susceptible to social engineering as human beings, but they are proving remarkably good at finding security vulnerabilities in human-made computer code. That reality is on full display this month with some of the more widely-used software makers โ including Apple, Google, Microsoft, Mozilla and Oracle โ fixing near record volumes of security bugs, and/or quickening the tempo of their patch releases.
As it does on the second Tuesday of every month, Microsoft today released software updates to address at least 118 security vulnerabilities in its various Windows operating systems and other products. Remarkably, this is the first Patch Tuesday in nearly two years that Microsoft is not shipping any fixes to deal with emergency zero-day flaws that are already being exploited. Nor have any of the flaws fixed today been previously disclosed (potentially giving attackers a heads up in how to exploit the weakness).
Sixteen of the vulnerabilities earned Microsoftโs most-dire โcriticalโ label, meaning malware or miscreants could abuse these bugs to seize remote control over a vulnerable Windows device with little or no help from the user. Rapid7 has done much of the heavy lifting in identifying some of the more concerning critical weaknesses this month, including:
- CVE-2026-41089: A critical stack-based buffer overflow in Windows Netlogon that offers an attacker SYSTEM privileges on the domain controller. No privileges or user interaction are required, and attack complexity is low. Patches are available for all versions of Windows Server from 2012 onwards.
- CVE-2026-41096: A critical RCE in the Windows DNS client implementation worthy of attention despite Microsoft assessing exploitation as less likely.
- CVE-2026-41103: A critical elevation of privilege vulnerability that allows an unauthorized attacker to impersonate an existing user by presenting forged credentials, thus bypassing Entra ID. Microsoft expects that exploitation is more likely.
Mayโs Patch Tuesday is a welcome respite from April, which saw Microsoft fix a near-record 167 security flaws. Microsoft was among a few dozen tech giants given access to a โProject Glasswing,โ a much-hyped AI capability developed by Anthropic that appears quite effective at unearthing security vulnerabilities in code.
Apple, another early participant in Project Glasswing, typically fixes an average of 20 vulnerabilities each time it ships a security update for iOS devices, said Chris Goettl, vice president of product management at Ivanti. On May 11, Apple shipped updates to address at least 52 vulnerabilities and backported the changes all the way to iPhone 6s and iOS 15.
Last month, Mozilla released Firefox 150, which resolved a whopping 271 vulnerabilities that were reportedly discovered during the Glasswing evaluation.
โSince Firefox 150.0.0 released, they have been on a more aggressive weekly cadence for security updates including the release of Firefox 150.0.3 on May Patch Tuesday resolving between three to five CVEs in each release,โ Goettl said.
The software giant Oracle likewise recently increased its patch pace in response to their work with Glasswing. In its most recent quarterly patch update, Oracle addressed at least 450 flaws, including more than 300 fixes for remotely exploitable, unauthenticated flaws. But at the end of April, Oracle announced it was switching to a monthly update cycle for critical security issues.
On May 8, Google started rolling out updates to its Chrome browser that fixed an astonishing 127 security flaws (up from just 30 the previous month). Chrome automagically downloads available security updates, but installing them requires fully restarting the browser.
If you encounter any weirdness applying the updates from Microsoft or any other vendor mentioned here, feel free to sound off in the comments below. Meantime, if you havenโt backed up your data and/or drive lately, doing that before updating is generally sound advice. For a more granular look at the Microsoft updates released today, checkout this inventory by the SANS Internet Storm Center.
Apple Patches Dozens of Vulnerabilities in macOS, iOS
The tech giant has also ported the patch for a recent deleted chats recovery issue to older versions of iOS.
The post Apple Patches Dozens of Vulnerabilities in macOS, iOS appeared first on SecurityWeek.