❌

Normal view

There are new articles available, click to refresh the page.
Today — 10 November 2026Main stream

This video shows how AI can read the radio waves coming from an HDMI cable to mimic what's on screen

  • There is tech that can turn the radiation from HDMI cables back into video
  • AI reduces errors in intercepted signals by over 60%
  • Digital is harder to decode than analog, but it's not impossible

Last week we discovered that your videos can give away your location thanks to airplane noises in the background that you can't even hear, and we've known for some years that Wi-Fi routers can be used to spot where people are in a room. So it's not a huge surprise to discover yet another way our tech is betraying us — and this time the culprit is the humble HDMI cable.

A post on X by Psalter shows TempestSDR, which can capture the signal from your HDMI cable and almost recreate the image on another screen, because the cable creates an electromagnetic field that can be read. The quality isn't great, but if you bring AI into the mix you can enhance it to make text readable and images clearer. An AI system especially for the task, called DeepTempest, reduces errors by over 60%.

The video below is quite alarming.

your HDMI cable can leak what’s on your screenwatch the laptop on the left. it reconstructs the video playing on the monitor beside it from radio signals leaking out of the HDMI connectionthis is TempestSDR. an antenna picks up the leakage, a HackRF radio captures it, and software turns it back into an imageresearchers took this further with Deep-TEMPEST, using AI to make recovered images and text easier to read. this clip shows the original techniquequality depends on shielding, distance and interference. the picture is imperfect, but recognizable content still gets througha wired connection can still leave a wireless traceNovember 8, 2026

Intercepting or playing with electronic leakage isn't new: 2001's Tempest for Eliza broadcast music to your radio by sending RF signals via your monitor, displaying images that generated specific radio frequencies. What's new is the AI element.

Is it time to don the tinfoil hat?

Not yet. DeepTempest does dramatically enhance images and reduce text errors, but as you can see from the video things are still pretty indistinct — and that's when the cable you're intercepting is right next to you, so you're close enough to see the display that you're intercepting.

You're not going to see much if you're in a van across the street, even if the cable being used is really poorly shielded, unless you've got a seriously powerful scanner.

DeepTempest was developed by Federico Larroca at the University of the Republic in Montevideo, Uruguay, and it does represent a major step forward: using text capture software DeepTempest was able to reconstruct text with roughly 30% of characters being misinterpreted.

That sounds like a lot but it's not enough to render text incomprehensible to human readers. And that error rate is a whopping 60% lower than the previous state-of-the-art attack.

The word Tempest is used in these systems because it's a US National Security Agency (NSA) codename that refers to spying via electromagnetic leakage, and measures to prevent it.

Those measures are distance, shielding, filtering and masking, and they consider more than just leakage: they also include sounds and vibrations, so for example it's possible to log keystrokes via a phone's motion sensor.

The history of this is fascinating and goes back to the Second World War, where the US military's teleprinters were found to be generating detectable electromagnetic spikes that could be intercepted to capture the text. The recommendation for shielding, filtering and masking comes from the machines' supplier, Bell System, and while technology has advanced somewhat since then the advice is still sound: if you're the kind of person that security services or other shadowy organizations might be interested in, don't buy crappy cables.

Pricier cables have electromagnetic shielding, and while high-end companies used to tell us that was essential because otherwise the audio and video fidelity wouldn't be as pristine as you want… but maybe it's signal leaking out rather than in that people will be more worried about in the modern world.

Before yesterdayMain stream

I wanted to love the Razer Basilisk V4 Pro gaming mouse, but there were just a few too many flaws

Razer Basilisk V4 Pro two-minute review

One of the first gaming mice I ever used was a Razer Basilisk, and I enjoyed it so much I wore the grippy rubber sides down until they were completely smooth. I’ve moved over to much more lightweight pointers in the years since, but with Razer launching the Basilisk V4 Pro, has the company done enough to tempt me back and resurrect that fond old love affair?

Spoiler alert: not completely. Because while the Basilisk V4 Pro is an excellent upgrade over its predecessor, it also comes with a few drawbacks that prevent it from being a total must-buy. It’s a great gaming mouse and might be ideal in the right (large) hands, but don’t go into this expecting perfection.

The Razer Basilisk V4 Pro mouse on a wooden desk.
Future
The Razer Basilisk V4 Pro mouse on a wooden desk.
Future

Let’s start with the positives. Razer has kept the Basilisk’s familiar ergonomic form factor, which is best suited to palm grip users, and its comfortable sculpted shape fits snugly into your hand. The build quality is also good, with solid plastics throughout and grippy textured finishes on the sides. And while it’s still a fairly hefty 100g, that’s still 10% lighter than the 112g Basilisk V3 Pro.

Battery life has increased to 200 hours in 2.4GHz mode at a 1,000Hz polling rate, or 275 hours on Bluetooth LE — up from 140 hours and 210 hours on the Basilisk V3 Pro. Note that that’s with the RGB lighting disabled. My review unit arrived with 66% battery, and in my testing (using it in 2.4GHz mode with a 1,000Hz polling rate and the RGB switched on), that dropped to 0% after 45 hours, so you can probably expect just under 70 hours on a full charge when using these settings. That’s a sizeable drop on 200 hours, but you’ll get much more juice if you dim the RGB lights.

Compared to the Basilisk V4 Pro’s predecessor, Razer has outfitted the latest version with a couple of extra buttons: one on the top-left corner of the left click and another next to the side buttons. That means you’ve now got 14 customizable controls on this device, making it a sort of halfway solution between a regular mouse and the button-crazy Razer Naga V3 Pro.

The Razer Basilisk V4 Pro mouse on a wooden desk.
Future
The Razer Basilisk V4 Pro mouse on a wooden desk.
Future

One of those buttons — the additional on one the side — could be assigned to Razer’s “Perfect 180” feature, the company suggested. This instantly spins your in-game character around 180 degrees, and if you think that sounds like cheating, you might have a point — even Razer admitted to us that they thought it could get banned in competitive games. Still, until that happens…

Razer also told us it had made the left and right click buttons sound less “ticky,” and they do have a satisfyingly soft and quiet actuation, one that’s a little less piercing to the ears than those on the Viper V4 Pro. They’re not silent, but they’re pleasing in use.

Sandwiched between those buttons is Razer’s HyperSpeed scroll wheel that, while not strictly a gaming feature, might be one of the Basilisk V4 Pro’s best aspects. You can set it to spin freely or ratchet (with two strength options) in Razer’s Synapse app, but its real party trick is its Smart-Reel feature. If you’ve set it to ratchet, a quick spin of the wheel automatically flips it into free-spin mode; put the brakes on and it moves back to ratcheting. It’s a great way to rapidly move through documents and spreadsheets without having to manually change modes.

The Razer Basilisk V4 Pro mouse on a wooden desk.
Future
The Razer Basilisk V4 Pro mouse on a wooden desk.
Future

But while I liked the HyperScroll wheel, I didn’t love it. Every time it switches modes (from free spinning to ratcheting, say), there’s a loud and slightly disconcerting crunching sound that starts to grate after a while.

Pushing it in to click the scroll wheel also feels very soft and mushy — it’s imprecise compared with Razer’s own alternatives like the Viper V4 Pro, which is much crisper to click. It’s a welcome feature on the mouse, but it’s clearly inferior to the MagSpeed wheel you’ll find on the Logitech MX Master 4.

This was something I found time and again with the Basilisk V4 Pro: I’d often be pleased with one feature, only to observe a downside to it after I’d used it a little more. I was happy to see an extra side button that I could program to my needs, for instance, but then started to notice it getting in the way and messing up my two-side-button muscle memory.

The Razer Basilisk V4 Pro mouse on a wooden desk.
Future
The Razer Basilisk V4 Pro mouse on a wooden desk.
Future

Or take the RGB lighting as another example: it looks lovely (especially on the Spectrum Cycling setting), but considering you never look at the mouse when using it, and your hand covers it up anyway, it felt a little pointless. Perhaps Razer could have done away with it and eked more battery life out of the Basilisk.

Ultimately, the Basilisk V4 Pro hasn’t converted me back to its temptingly sculpted form factor. It offers a capable combination of features, buttons and comfort, and for many gamers — especially those with larger hands — it’ll be an attractive option. It’s still one of the best gaming mice around, despite its drawbacks.

But for every two steps forward, there’s one step back that tempers its progress, whether that’s the imperfect HyperScroll wheel, the hard-to-reach buttons for all but palm grip users or the questionable, battery-draining RGB. I went into this looking to rekindle my love for an old flame, but in the end, I found myself stuck in the Basilisk’s friend zone.

Razer Basilisk V4 Pro: Price & release date

  • Available to buy now
  • Priced at $169.99 / £169.99 / $289.95 AUD

The Razer Basilisk V4 Pro is priced at $169.99 / £169.99 / $289.95 AUD and is available now from Razer’s website and third-party retailers. Its price has crept up by $10 / £10 / $10 AUD versus the Basilisk V3 Pro 35K.

Razer Basilisk V4 Pro review: Specs

Connectivity

Razer HyperSpeed Wireless Gen-2 (2.4GHz), Bluetooth 6.2, wired (USB-A to USB-C)

Battery life

Up to 200 hours (2.4GHz), up to 275 hours (Bluetooth LE)

Sensor

Razer Focus Pro 50K Optical Sensor Gen-3

Polling rate

Up to 8,000Hz (wireless and wired)

Maximum sensitivity (DPI)

50,000

Programmable buttons

14

Dimensions

127.5mm x 75.8mm x 42.7mm

Weight

100g (3.53oz)

Should I buy the Razer Basilisk V4 Pro?

Razer Basilisk V4 Pro Scorecard

Attribute

Notes

Score

Features

14 customizable buttons, the HyperScroll wheel and some interesting software features

5/5

Performance

A great performer that’s stymied by a few notable stumbles, like the scroll wheel’s squishiness and the battery-draining RGB

4/5

Design

Great build quality and a comfortable design, but it might not be best for smaller hands

4/5

Value

Very expensive, but you get plenty for your cash

4/5

Buy it if…

You want a gaming all-rounder
With plenty of buttons and a comfy ergonomic shape, the Basilisk V4 Pro excels in many different areas.View Deal

You want the HyperScroll wheel
Sure, it’s not perfect, but Razer’s HyperScroll wheel is still a welcome addition that elevates the mouse, especially when it comes to productivity and everyday tasks.View Deal

Battery life is important to you
With 200 hours of juice — or 275 hours on Bluetooth LE — this mouse just keeps going and going and going.View Deal

Don’t buy it if…

You prefer lightweight mice
Razer has cut the Basilisk’s weight by 10% compared to its predecessor, but it’s still far from what we’d call lightweight.View Deal

You’re a fingertip user or have small hands
Some of the new buttons on the Basilisk V4 Pro are hard to reach for certain grips and hand sizes.View Deal

You’re pinching the pennies
$169.99 / £169.99 / $289.95 AUD is an awful lot to pay for a mouse, and there are many capable options that will cost you less than half of Razer’s asking price.View Deal

Also consider

Logitech G502 X Plus
A superb gaming mouse that looks remarkably similar to the Basilisk V4 Pro, complete with ergonomic shape and a plethora of buttons, the Logitech G502 X Plus is a stunning addition to Logitech’s popular lineup.

Read our full Logitech G502 X Plus reviewView Deal

Corsair Nightsword V2 Wireless
A more affordable option if you value ergonomics and customization, Corsair’s Nightsword V2 Wireless boasts long battery life and a high-quality sensor that makes it ideal for fast-paced gaming sessions.

Read our full Corsair Nightsword V2 Wireless reviewView Deal

How I tested the Razer Basilisk V4 Pro

  • I spent a week testing the Razer Basilisk V4 Pro in various games to see how it managed in different genres
  • I also explored its customization options in the Razer Synapse app to see how well it could be adapted to different needs

I tested the Razer Basilisk V4 Pro over the course of a week. I used it for everyday tasks like browsing the web and writing this review, and tried it in a range of different games, including Call of Duty, Football Manager 27 and Stardew Valley. Additionally, I explored its customization options in the Razer Synapse app to see how easy it was to adjust its settings.

❌
❌