Sean Plankey, most recently the nominee for director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, is joining defense technology company UFORCE as its U.S. chief executive officer.
The London-based company created out of nine Ukrainian-based firms announced Plankey’s move Monday less than a month after he withdrew his nomination amid difficulties overcoming objections from senators who had placed a hold on it.
Plankey’s a cyber veteran of the first Trump administration but also had been serving as senior adviser on the Coast Guard at the Homeland Security Department, retiring from the Coast Guard this year.
UFORCE makes combat drones for air, land and sea and plans to have its first U.S.-made unmanned surface vessels hitting the water by this summer. The startup reportedly brought its valuation to $1 billion earlier this year.
“The United States and its allies are looking for defense technology partners that can move
quickly, innovate continuously and deliver systems already proven across theaters of combat,” Plankey said in a statement. “UFORCE is uniquely positioned to meet that demand and we will do that by manufacturing these capabilities in America.”
Said Oleg Rogynskyy, co-founder and CEO of UFORCE: “Sean’s decision to join UFORCE reflects the strength of our platform and the growing recognition that the future of autonomous defense will be shaped by companies able to combine real combat validation with scalable Western deployment,”
CISA has gone without a permanent director for the entirety of the second Trump administration, and the president has yet to put forward a nominee for the position since Plankey’s withdrawal last month.
Former Oklahoma senator Markwayne Mullin took over as DHS secretary in late March.
The post Former CISA nominee Sean Plankey named US CEO of defense startup appeared first on CyberScoop.
Executives at top U.S. robotics companies asked Congress for federal dollars, new legislation and a simpler regulatory field, arguing the support is necessary to adapt to the AI era and compete with their well-oiled, state-funded Chinese competitors.
The U.S. robotics sector, estimated at $50 billion in value, includes world famous companies like Boston Dynamics. The industry is projected to sell millions of robots across the country over the next four years.
According to a 2025 report from the International Federation of Robotics, the market has sold and installed an average of 500,000 robots between 2020 and 2024. China alone accounted for 54% of those installations, compared to just 9% for America.
Matthew Malchano, vice president of software at Boston Dynamics, told lawmakers in the House Homeland Security cyber subcommittee hearing Tuesday that robotics represent the necessary physical infrastructure to support the country’s efforts to dominate the global AI race, with robots, drones and other machines more fully integrating AI systems in the coming years.
He pointed to Chinese companies like Unitree, which are capturing market share with police departments and universities across the United States, despite contracting ties to the Chinese military and cybersecurity vulnerabilities like a wormable exploit found in 2025 that would allow an attacker to takeover fleets of Unitree robots.
Malchano said Unitree is one of “dozens” of Chinese companies propped up by China’s national AI and robotics plan, which “envisions transforming virtually every major industry in China by integrating AI powered robots” through funding and favorable policies.
He pressed U.S. lawmakers for a similar national strategy, and stumped for the passage of the National Commission on Robotics Act, sponsored by Rep. Jay Olbernolte, R-Calif., that would develop a bipartisan commission to drive it.
Max Fenkell, global head of policy and government relations at ScaleAI, said while the U.S. is winning the AI race on its chosen metrics – model quality and chips – it is “losing” on data and implementation.
Unlike large language models, which download training data straight from the internet, AI systems for robots will require unique training data gathered, categorized and labeled through thousands of hours of bespoke testing.
While China has pursued an “industrialized” training strategy in tandem with industry, funding mile-long stretches of warehouses dedicated to gathering training data for Chinese companies, the U.S. has no similar strategy.
“We’re seeing two different races play out and I fear right now the United States may be winning the wrong one,” he said.
Executives at the hearing were unanimous in suggesting Congress block U.S. federal agencies from purchasing Chinese-made robots and create a single federal regulatory standard for the industry, while Fenkell and Malchado asked for the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency to conduct a security review of foreign-made robots.
At the hearing, Rep. James Walkinshaw, D-Va., noted a long history of bipartisan cooperation to help U.S. companies compete against state-subsidized Chinese firms.
“With extensive state investment in technology companies and laws that enlist private companies to serve the interest of the government, the PRC’s military-civil fusion is a serious threat to our own national security,” said Walkinshaw.
As lawmakers weigh how best to position U.S. companies to compete with China, they must also grapple with the possibility that AI-powered robots could be hacked, manipulated or intentionally turned against the public.
Privacy and civil liberties experts have long expressed concerns about the use of robots in areas like policing, in certain military contexts and against American citizens.
The requests for more help from Washington comes at the same time the U.S. government, including the military and Department of Homeland Security, has become markedly more aggressive under the Trump administration about tracking data on Americans and using force against U.S. citizens involved in immigration operations.
Companies like Boston Dynamics sell their robots to manufacturing facilities, semiconductor fabricators, energy plants, first responders, and the U.S. Secret Service. But they also sell them to police departments and the U.S. military, and an early version of the company’s viral “BigDog” quadruped model was created through the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency at the Department of Defense.
Last year, Immigrations and Customs Enforcement spent $78,000 for a Canadian robot that could perform similar tasks as Spot, another Boston Dynamics robot model, including deploying smoke bombs, according to Governing.
Last month, DHS finalized a $1 billion contract with Palantir to expand AI data analytics across the department to support immigration enforcement. The Coast Guard alone is investing $350 million in robotics and autonomous systems by 2028.
Congressional Democrats are currently blocking funding for DHS over its immigration and data collection policies.
The post U.S. robotics companies want federal help to keep Chinese robots out of America’s networks appeared first on CyberScoop.
Login