State and local officials and election security experts largely panned a Thursday night primetime speech by President Donald Trump, saying it was reflective of White House βdesperationβ to find any credible evidence to support their claims that U.S. elections have been rigged against the two-term president.
While the White House teased explosive new claims about the potential compromise of U.S. elections by China, Trumpβs speech was a rehash of claims that both have no supporting evidence and have been repeatedly debunked when investigated.Β
David Becker, executive director of the Center for Election Innovation and Research and a former voting and civil rights attorney at the Department of Justice, said none of Trumpβs claims or allegations were new or substantively different from previous theories heβs been espousing over the past six years.
βThe White House promised a bombshell and they delivered a dud,β Becker said on a call with reporters Friday. βThere was nothing that even calls into question past elections β certainly not the 2020 election.β
The administration declassified a huge tranche of documents from the intelligence agencies, and news outlets continue to sift through them, but thus far nothing has been found that remotely validates the administrationβs claims about foreign interference from China costing Trump the 2020 election.
In fact, some of the most relevant documents found at this point have supported the opposite conclusion, with agencies assessing that while China engaged in influence campaigns around the election, it was not attempting to outright interfere with U.S. election infrastructure, hack voting machines or manipulate ballots.
John Solomon, a former journalist and opinion writer at The Hill brought in by the White House to lead the investigation, also told reporters Thursday that his search hasnβt turned up evidence that the 2020, 2022 or 2024 elections were affected by fraud.
The one new major claim by Trump β that the Department of Homeland Security determined hundreds of thousands of noncitizens were registered to vote across four states β is almost certainly false or overinflated, given that it contradicts post-election state audits that have routinely found single or double-digit numbers of noncitizens registered to vote within a single state across multiple elections.
Over the past six years, similar claims by GOP secretaries of state and political activists purporting to find mass numbers of noncitizens registered to vote have turned out to be grossly inflated due to shoddy data analysis, and the vast majority of cases involving βsuspected noncitizensβ turn out to be U.S. citizens who are legally registered to vote.
The White House has provided little to no information on the methodology used to flag and identify supposed noncitizen voters, other than alluding to the use of βcommercial dataβ and federal databases. A federal court recently ordered DHS to dismantle the SAVE database, its primary database for verifying the citizenship status of U.S. voters, because it was unreliable and violated longstanding privacy laws.Β
Β Apart from DHS admitting its own data on citizenship is incomplete, Becker said using a list that relies on matching voter files with commercial data is not a reliable way of determining citizenship.
βIt is impossible to take a public voter file with very little information that is uniquely identified, like a driverβs license number, and compare it to a commercial database and say for sure the Maria Rodriguez or the John Lee or the Shawn OβHara you have on that is the same person,β he said.
Election officials also responded forcefully. Nevada Democratic Secretary of State Francisco Aguilar said that Trump has spent a decade attempting to manufacture a crisis around voter fraud and the presidentβs speech Thursday night was an extension of that effort.Β
βAs Nevadaβs chief elections officer, itβs my job to call balls and strikes β so when the President lies, I am obligated to call him out,β Aguilar said in a statement. βThe facts have not changed: Nevadaβs elections are among the safest, most secure and accessible in the nation.β
Itβs not just Democrats that have objected to the administrationβs efforts. GOP states have gone to court to block the Department of Justice from obtaining their voter data, and Idahoβs Republican secretary of state responded to a DOJ letter threatening prosecution of election officials as βnot well metβ and potentially illegal under state ethics laws.Β
Trumpβs speech potentially casts additional light on recent White House decisions, such as firing all three commissioners on the Election Assistance Commission. The agency helps certify voting machines for security, and all three commissioners have served across administrations and maintain close relationships with state and local election officials.Β Β
Pamela Smith, CEO of the nonprofit Verified Voting, said that while the EAC canβt take certain actions that need commissioner approval, βcritical functions like voting system testing and certification can continue under the existing framework and should not be affected.β
In 2020, Trumpβs initial claims of widespread election fraud were undercut by leaders at the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, which said there was no evidence the election was compromised. The removal of EAC commissioners could represent an attempt to preempt any efforts to rebut or criticize White House claims that elections and voting machines have been compromised.
Some have worried that Trump could use the speech as a pretext to declare a national emergency or cancel elections.
Tom Lopach, CEO of the Voter Participation Center, said βyou donβt dismantle election security infrastructure if youβre serious about protecting elections.β
βYou dismantle it if youβre planning to claim, without evidence, that the system failed you,β he said.Β
While Becker takes Trumpβs broadsides against state election authority seriously, he also said itβs important not to lose sight of the fact that, in his view, the administration is losing the argument across the board.
More than a dozen federal courts have unanimously rejected the federal governmentβs attempts to forcibly obtain state voter data, while other courts have rejected core pieces of his election-related executive orders. State officials have publicly β and at times, angrily β pushed back on the administrationβs demands as blatant federal overreach.Β
Becker predicted that such an act would be quickly shot down by courts as well, noting that the U.S. has never canceled or postponed an election in its 250-year history, including when British troops were marauding on American soil during the War of 1812 or even at the height of the Civil War.
Itβs important not to conflate the White Houseβs bluster and intentions with its actual authorities or capability to seize control of U.S. elections.
βThis is what panic and desperation look like,β Becker said. βTheyβve had 18 months in total control of the federal government and they have found nothing that would support President Trumpβs lies about the 2020 election, and so theyβre just trying to grab as much garbage as they can and throw it up against the wall, and itβs not sticking.β
The post State officials, election experts pan Trump speech: βThis is what desperation looks likeβ appeared first on CyberScoop.