Congress extended a controversial surveillance law for 45 days on Thursday, hours before its latest expiration following an earlier extension.
The Senate passed — then the House cleared — a 45-day extension of Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which authorizes warrantless surveillance of foreign targets. But those targets are sometimes communicating electronically with Americans, and intelligence officials can search the database using their identifying information, which has long given privacy groups and privacy-minded lawmakers heartburn.
The 45-day reprieve gives lawmakers more time to hammer out a lasting deal, and comes after the leaders of the Senate Intelligence Committee agreed to send a letter to the Director of National Intelligence and attorney general, seeking swift declassification of a letter on a classified ruling from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.
Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., had sought release of that opinion, and had resisted giving unanimous consent for the latest short-term extension to move forward until Senate Intelligence Chairman Tom Cotton, R-Ark., and top panel Democrat Mark Warner of Virginia agreed to send the letter.
A declassification review was already underway, but the Cotton-Warner letter states that “We expect that this declassification review will be completed and the FISC opinion released publicly within 15 days,” according to Wyden, speaking on the Senate floor.
The March 17 opinion reportedly came with annual recertification of the warrantless surveillance program. The Justice Department is appealing that ruling because it blocked them from using certain tools to analyze communications.
“A few weeks ago, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court found major compliance problems related to the surveillance law known as section 702,” Wyden said earlier this month. “These compliance problems are directly related to Americans’ Constitutional rights.”
Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., said the extension will give lawmakers additional room to hold “discussion on reforms.”
The House this week had passed a 3-year reauthorization with some changes to the surveillance program, but key to doing so was leadership’s agreement to attach legislative language on a separate matter that would ban a central bank digital currency. Thune had said that language was going nowhere in the Senate.
On Thursday, the House voted 261-111 to extend the law for 45 days. President Donald Trump has sought a “clean” 18-month reauthorization of the surveillance powers.
The extension continues a perennial ritual for the Hill when it comes to Section 702: A deadline looms, and Congress kicks the can down the road repeatedly.
The post Congress kicks the can down the road on surveillance law (again) appeared first on CyberScoop.
A pair of persistent and problematic threat groups affiliated with The Com are actively targeting organizations across multiple critical infrastructure sectors for rapid data theft and extortion attacks, according to CrowdStrike.
The financially-motivated attackers, which CrowdStrike tracks as Cordial Spider and Snarky Spider, have used voice-phishing and social engineering attacks to break into victims’ identity platforms and traverse SaaS environments since at least October 2025, the company said in a report Thursday, which it shared exclusively with CyberScoop prior to release.
Adam Meyers, senior vice president of counter adversary operations at CrowdStrike, said the subgroups composed of native English speakers primarily target U.S.-based organizations in the academic, aviation, retail, hospitality, automotive, financial services, legal and technology sectors.
This “new wave of ecrime threat actors” are closely aligned with Scattered Spider and linked to other subsets of The Com, including SLSH and ShinyHunters, Meyers said.
Because these attacks target identity systems and can expose data in other connected services beyond the initial breach point, it’s difficult to determine how many victims have been caught up in these campaigns.
CrowdStrike’s warning closely follows research Palo Alto Networks’ Unit 42 and the Retail & Hospitality Information Sharing and Analysis Center shared last week about Cordial Spider’s string of attacks targeting organizations in the retail and hospitality industry, among others.
Cordial and Snarky Spider have set lures via voice calls, text messages and emails directing targeting employees to phishing pages posing as their employer’s legitimate single sign-on page or primary identity provider, researchers said.
These phishing pages, which capture credentials, session keys or tokens, depending on the workflow, provide attackers an entry point into systems, which they exploit for widespread access across victims’ entire SaaS ecosystems.
Attackers use these initial hooks to remove and establish multi-factor authentication devices, then delete emails and other alerts that would otherwise warn organizations of potential malicious activity, researchers said.
The data theft for extortion campaigns share striking similarities, but CrowdStrike said the tactics, techniques and procedures for each subgroup are distinct. These variances include hours of operation, different phishing domain providers, preferred operating systems, data leak sites, and the tools or devices they used to register for multi-factor authentication.
The domain for BlackFile, Cordial Spider’s data-leak site, was offline as of Wednesday, according to Meyers.
CrowdStrike declined to put a range on the groups’ extortion demands, but Unit 42 previously said Cordial Spider, which is also tracked as CL-CRI-1116 and UNC6671, are typically in the seven-figure range.
Some victims that didn’t pay extortion demands have been subjected to DDoS attacks, and Snarky Spider has used more aggressive follow-on harassment tactics, including the swatting of victim organizations’ employees, Meyers said.
CrowdStrike said Cordial and Snarky Spider also use residential proxy networks — including Mullvad, Oxylabs, NetNut, 9Proxy, Infatica and NSOCKS — to evade IP-based detection and blend in with typical traffic.
Residential proxy networks, which rely on IP addresses assigned to real home users, can serve a legitimate purpose, but researchers have been warning that unethical or outright criminal operators are abusing these networks to build and support botnets, cybercrime campaigns, espionage and other malicious activity.
Cordial and Snarky Spider haven’t achieved the impact or technical capability of Scattered Spider, but the groups share many commonalities and objectives, Meyers said.
“They’ve kind of taken their playbook and they’re using a lot of their techniques, but we haven’t really seen the technical sophistication demonstrated by them that we saw from Scattered Spider,” he said. “It’s kind of the new generation of Scattered Spider.”
The post Two new extortion crews are speedrunning the Scattered Spider playbook appeared first on CyberScoop.
Researchers warn that BlackFile, an extortion group likely associated with The Com, continues to impersonate IT support in voice-phishing and social engineering attacks that have impacted organizations in multiple industries, including healthcare, technology, transportation, logistics, wholesale and retail.
Attackers have been actively targeting organizations in the retail and hospitality industry since February, according to Unit 42’s latest intelligence on the campaign, which the Retail & Hospitality Information Sharing and Analysis Center (RH-ISAC) released alongside indicators of compromise Thursday.
The threat group, which is also tracked as CL-CRI-1116, UNC6671 and Cordial Spider, appears to be targeting victims opportunistically in a campaign that remains active and ongoing, Matt Brady, senior principal researcher at Palo Alto Networks’ Unit 42, told CyberScoop.
“The core objective of these threat actors is to pressure targeted organizations into paying large ransom demands, typically in the seven-figure range,” Brady said.
Unit 42 declined to say how many organizations have been impacted thus far, and RH-ISAC did not respond to a request for comment.
BlackFile’s attacks against companies in the retail and hospitality sector are part of a broader wave of voice-phishing attacks initiated by multiple cybercrime groups, which Google Threat Intelligence Group and Okta warned about in January.
Unit 42 also noted that BlackFile’s activities overlap with an ongoing data theft and extortion campaign CrowdStrike has been tracking as Cordial Spider since at least October 2025.
Yet, the threat group’s tactics have been far from cordial. RH-ISAC said some attackers have swatted company personnel, including executives, to increase leverage and pressure victims to pay their ransom demands.
The threat group lures victims via voice-phishing attacks and phishing pages mimicking corporate single-sign on services to steal credentials before moving into privileged accounts.
“They scrape internal employee directories to obtain contact lists for executives,” RH-ISAC wrote in a blog post. “By compromising these senior accounts via further social engineering, they gain persistent, broad-spectrum access to the environment that mirrors legitimate executive session activity.”
The group’s unauthorized access and data theft for extortion activity spans SaaS environments, Microsoft Graph API permissions, Salesforce API access, internal repositories, SharePoint sites and datasets containing employee’s phone numbers and business records.
BlackFile also created a data-leak site to extort victims that it claims ignored or failed to agree to its demands, according to researchers.
Brady said Unit 42 has observed relatively consistent activity from the threat group since February.
RH-ISAC advises organizations to manage multi-factor identity verification for callers and limit the IT support actions that can be completed in a single call without escalation to management.
The post BlackFile actively extorting data-theft victims in retail and hospitality sector appeared first on CyberScoop.
The threat actor infected victims with the Snow malware family – Snowbelt, Snowglaze, and Snowbasin – for persistent access.
The post UNC6692 Uses Email Bombing, Social Engineering to Deploy ‘Snow’ Malware appeared first on SecurityWeek.
The latest attempt to re-up a controversial expiring surveillance law has failed to placate vocal critics on both the left and right of the political spectrum.
Two House votes failed last week to extend the spying powers under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) for 18 months without changes, leading to Congress instead passing a 10-day reauthorization. GOP leaders have been scrambling to find a bill they can pass since with the April 30 deadline approaching.
House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., introduced a bill Thursday to extend it for three years, with a section stating that government officials can’t use Section 702 to target Americans. Under Section 702, U.S. spies and law enforcement agencies can warrantlessly search electronic communications of foreign targets. But those targets are sometimes communicating with U.S. persons, and officials can search the communications database using their personal information.
But critics of the latest Johnson proposal say the language about targeting Americans is window dressing.
“On the whole, it is an empty-calories bill and nothing more that does not engage in reform,” Jake Laperruque, deputy director of the center’s security and surveillance project at the Center for Democracy and Technology, said in a call with reporters Friday.
Civil liberties groups have long called for a warrant requirement for U.S. person-based searches.
“It doesn’t require a warrant or any kind of court process for U.S. person searches,” said Kia Hamadanchy, senior policy counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union’s political advocacy division. “The main reform just restates existing law… . It’s also completely irrelevant to the issue at hand, because backdoor searches have never been the product of the government intentionally targeting U.S. persons under 702. The problem is that they are incidentally collecting U.S. person communications and searching the communications of Americans.”
Gene Schaerr, general counsel of the conservative Project for Privacy and Surveillance Accountability, called the proposal “smoke and mirrors.”
The legislation did win over at least one key lawmaker, however: Rep. Warren Davidson, who had earlier introduced an amendment to attach a ban on the government buying American’s information from third-party data brokers, and who was a chief co-sponsor of legislation requiring a warrant for U.S. person searches under Section 702.
“Collectively, this set of reforms provides robust privacy protections for American citizens. Congress should bank this win and reauthorize Section 702,” Davidson said on X. “Then, we should swiftly begin gutting the unmitigated surveillance state left growing unchecked during these 702 fights.”
But it doesn’t look like it has yet won over enough conservative House Freedom Caucus members, and few Democrats have been on board with Johnson’s plans.
Rep. Ted Lieu, D-Calif., indicated on X in harsh terms that he doesn’t trust FBI Director Kash Patel with current Section 702 powers.
The post Latest spy power reauthorization bill leaves critics unimpressed appeared first on CyberScoop.
Congress is grappling with renewal of a surveillance law set to expire at the end of this month that critics say is a mystery on how much of a difference it has made for controversial government spying authorities — for better or worse.
The 2024 law reauthorized so-called Section 702 powers of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which authorizes warrantless surveillance of electronic communications of foreign targets. Most controversially, the law allows U.S. officials to search (“query”) those communications databases using Americans’ personal information, as long as the American is in contact with someone overseas, which raises significant privacy concerns.
Backers of the 2024 law, known as the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act (RISAA), point to 56 changes it made to deal with criticisms of Section 702, following a period where abuses came to light, including hundreds of thousands of improper searches. At the same time, the law made changes that some feared could actually expand Section 702 powers.
The House voted to extend the law as-is for 10 days early Friday. The Senate then did the same. The Trump administration has sought a 180-day “clean” reauthorization.
As Congress weighs potential extensions of the 2024 law without making changes to it, “I don’t think we know” what good has come of it, said Elizabeth Goitein, senior director of the Brennan Center for Justice’s liberty and national security program. By the same token, it’s difficult to know whether some of the expansion fears have come to fruition, she said: “We don’t have reliable information on this.”
Added Jake Laperruque of the Center for Democracy and Technology: “There’s a lot of black boxes here.”
Both Goitein and Laperruque are skeptical of any positive change from RISAA, though, and have long advocated for a warrant requirement for U.S. person searches. Intelligence agencies have resisted that addition, claiming that it would dramatically slow down time-sensitive national security investigations.
By contrast, Glenn Gerstell, former general counsel at the National Security Agency, said RISAA constituted “the most significant set of reforms to the statute since its adoption in 2008.” and that “those reforms have had a dramatic effect.”
One major point of dispute is to what degree the number of U.S. person searches dropped, particularly because of a conclusion in last year’s Justice Department inspector general report finding that an “advanced filtering tool generated queries that were not tracked by the FBI.”
As the report outlines, an FBI system has an “‘advanced filter function’ that allows users to select a specific FBI casefile number or ‘facility’ (e.g., a phone number or email address), using a drop-down menu or search bar, to review communications with targeted facilities.
“This functionality enables users to select from lists of ‘participants’ in communication with targeted facilities and review communications of those participants.In or around August 2024,” the report continues. The National Security Division of the Justice Department “became aware of the participants filter function in [the system] and was concerned that searches conducted through use of the participants filter constituted separate queries that must satisfy the query standard and comply with all query procedural requirements.”
By the intelligence community’s count, the number of U.S. person searches has otherwise mostly declined even going back to before the 2024 law’s passage: 119,383 in 2022, 57,094 in 2023, 5,518 in 2024 and 7,413 in 2025.
“It is quite clear that the searches that were run using this filter function met the statutory definition of queries, and yet the FBI for some significant period of time decided to not count them as queries,” Goitein said.
Laperruque, deputy director of CDT’s security and surveillance project, said an audit mandate in the 2024 law was potentially useful, but hasn’t proven to be in reality.
“At least it should mean that it should help try to detect abuse if it is happening,” he said. “The problem there, though, is you’re still relying on the FBI to properly log all of its quarries and hand them over for DOJ to be checked, which hasn’t happened. You’re trusting DOJ and the executive to engage in self-policing, and that’s something where folks rightfully have a lot of skepticism based on how DOJ has conducted itself recently.”
Gerstell, a senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, points to numerous reviews — including a staff report from the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board (PCLOB) — that indicate a drop in U.S. person searches. It’s the biggest change of RISAA, he said.
“The most significant one is a very substantial drop in the number of queries of the database for U.S. person information, which has been a big focus for privacy advocates, and there’s been a dramatic drop, so much so that both the Inspector General for the Department of Justice and the staff of the PCLOB have said, ‘I wonder if we’re overdoing it.’ … Every single one of them presents those numbers, without caveat.”
On the advanced filter function count, Gerstell acknowledged the ambiguity, but referred to reports that said, as he summarized, “If they had been considered queries, it appears that most would have been compliant anyway… because they were a subset of something that was already compliant. But we don’t know if any of them were noncompliant, and we don’t have the data.”
On the other side of the RISAA debate, critics argued that its revised definition of “electronic communications service provider” could dramatically expand surveillance to include businesses like coffee shops or landlords. The reported, but formally undisclosed, real target of the change was data centers.
“That was a pretty big expansion with a lot of potential abuse,” Laperruque said. But “we don’t really know much about how it’s changed” anything, he said.
Virginia Sen. Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Intelligence Committee, sought to advance clarifying language about that subject after RISAA’s passage, and the Biden administration said it would confine the provision’s use to the kind of undisclosed businesses that prompted the provision in the first place. Laperreque noted that the Trump administration has made no such promises, and Warner’s clarifying language never became law.
The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) has issued its annual opinion re-certifying the Section 702 program for another year. However, the court reportedly took issue with the program’s f filtering systems, saying that when such a system is used to look for information on Americans it must be counted as a query, subjecting it to additional restrictions. The Trump administration plans to appeal the ruling.
Other critiques of the 2024 law include that many of its biggest changes weren’t changes at all, but instead codifications of changes that then-FBI Director Christopher Wray had implemented. Abuses continued after those changes, Goitein said.
Gerstell said enshrining those changes into law wasn’t a bad thing. “The statute expressly codified some but not all of Wray reforms — and some went beyond that in many ways,” he said. Those changes included requiring FBI deputy director approval of U.S. person queries that target elected officials, government appointees, political candidates or organizations, or media. Those were some of the more criticized prior targeting abuses.
Republicans remain divided over extending the law. Some who had reservations about a clean reauthorization have come on board, such as Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, who had taken issue with limitations on congressional attendance of FISC proceedings but since has had that concern resolved.
Others may have been swayed by direct lobbying from the Trump administration, including a social media post from Trump himself this week, where he wrote, “I am willing to risk the giving up of my Rights and Privileges as a Citizen for our Great Military and Country!” Still others have had their position against a clean extension hardened by the FISC court opinion and additional concerns.
Other issues have become enmeshed in the reauthorization debate, such as calls to block government agencies from purchasing information from data brokers. But “this has nothing to do with this authority,” said George Barnes, former deputy director of the NSA.
But lawmakers of both parties have complained for months that the administration was silent for too long as the law’s expiration loomed.
Only recently did the Trump administration share new examples of the law’s successes, including that it had thwarted a 2024 terrorist attack on a Taylor Swift concert. Barnes said releasing such examples might offer a public case for the law, but has its downsides, too.
“I was always understanding but frustrated by the need to release examples just because they choreographed to the adversary what we could do,” said Barnes, now Red Cell’s cyber practice president.
Reauthorizing Section 702 is urgent, though, for cybersecurity purposes, he said.
“A lot of the impact that I saw the authority having over my time was in cybersecurity as well,” he said. “And so when you have foreign entities that are targeting the U.S., or U.S. interests overseas, that authority can be positioned to help eliminate those activities.”
The post The surveillance law Congress can’t quit — and can’t explain appeared first on CyberScoop.
An offensive security perspective on Microsoft Edge WebView2 Runtime, including architectural weaknesses, existing vulnerabilities, and exploitation methods.
The post Signed, Trusted, and Abused: Proxy Execution via WebView2 appeared first on Black Hills Information Security, Inc..
The critical-severity flaw leaks application memory and can be exploited to obtain authenticated administrative session IDs.
The post Exploitation of Fresh Citrix NetScaler Vulnerability Begins appeared first on SecurityWeek.
Microsoft Corp. today pushed security updates to fix at least 77 vulnerabilities in its Windows operating systems and other software. There are no pressing “zero-day” flaws this month (compared to February’s five zero-day treat), but as usual some patches may deserve more rapid attention from organizations using Windows. Here are a few highlights from this month’s Patch Tuesday.
Image: Shutterstock, @nwz.
Two of the bugs Microsoft patched today were publicly disclosed previously. CVE-2026-21262 is a weakness that allows an attacker to elevate their privileges on SQL Server 2016 and later editions.
“This isn’t just any elevation of privilege vulnerability, either; the advisory notes that an authorized attacker can elevate privileges to sysadmin over a network,” Rapid7’s Adam Barnett said. “The CVSS v3 base score of 8.8 is just below the threshold for critical severity, since low-level privileges are required. It would be a courageous defender who shrugged and deferred the patches for this one.”
The other publicly disclosed flaw is CVE-2026-26127, a vulnerability in applications running on .NET. Barnett said the immediate impact of exploitation is likely limited to denial of service by triggering a crash, with the potential for other types of attacks during a service reboot.
It would hardly be a proper Patch Tuesday without at least one critical Microsoft Office exploit, and this month doesn’t disappoint. CVE-2026-26113 and CVE-2026-26110 are both remote code execution flaws that can be triggered just by viewing a booby-trapped message in the Preview Pane.
Satnam Narang at Tenable notes that just over half (55%) of all Patch Tuesday CVEs this month are privilege escalation bugs, and of those, a half dozen were rated “exploitation more likely” — across Windows Graphics Component, Windows Accessibility Infrastructure, Windows Kernel, Windows SMB Server and Winlogon. These include:
–CVE-2026-24291: Incorrect permission assignments within the Windows Accessibility Infrastructure to reach SYSTEM (CVSS 7.8)
–CVE-2026-24294: Improper authentication in the core SMB component (CVSS 7.8)
–CVE-2026-24289: High-severity memory corruption and race condition flaw (CVSS 7.8)
–CVE-2026-25187: Winlogon process weakness discovered by Google Project Zero (CVSS 7.8).
Ben McCarthy, lead cyber security engineer at Immersive, called attention to CVE-2026-21536, a critical remote code execution bug in a component called the Microsoft Devices Pricing Program. Microsoft has already resolved the issue on their end, and fixing it requires no action on the part of Windows users. But McCarthy says it’s notable as one of the first vulnerabilities identified by an AI agent and officially recognized with a CVE attributed to the Windows operating system. It was discovered by XBOW, a fully autonomous AI penetration testing agent.
XBOW has consistently ranked at or near the top of the Hacker One bug bounty leaderboard for the past year. McCarthy said CVE-2026-21536 demonstrates how AI agents can identify critical 9.8-rated vulnerabilities without access to source code.
“Although Microsoft has already patched and mitigated the vulnerability, it highlights a shift toward AI-driven discovery of complex vulnerabilities at increasing speed,” McCarthy said. “This development suggests AI-assisted vulnerability research will play a growing role in the security landscape.”
Microsoft earlier provided patches to address nine browser vulnerabilities, which are not included in the Patch Tuesday count above. In addition, Microsoft issued a crucial out-of-band (emergency) update on March 2 for Windows Server 2022 to address a certificate renewal issue with passwordless authentication technology Windows Hello for Business.
Separately, Adobe shipped updates to fix 80 vulnerabilities — some of them critical in severity — in a variety of products, including Acrobat and Adobe Commerce. Mozilla Firefox v. 148.0.2 resolves three high severity CVEs.
For a complete breakdown of all the patches Microsoft released today, check out the SANS Internet Storm Center’s Patch Tuesday post. Windows enterprise admins who wish to stay abreast of any news about problematic updates, AskWoody.com is always worth a visit. Please feel free to drop a comment below if you experience any issues apply this month’s patches.
Identity is still the primary entry point for cyberattacks, according to Palo Alto Networks’ threat intelligence firm Unit 42. In its annual incident response report released Tuesday, Unit 42 found that identity-based techniques accounted for nearly two-thirds of all initial network intrusions last year.
Social engineering was the leading attack method, accounting for one-third of the 750 incidents Unit 42 responded to in the one-year period ending in September 2025. Attackers also bypassed security controls with compromised credentials, brute-force attacks, overly permissive identity policies and insider threats, researchers said.
The persistent pitfalls of identity extended beyond initial access, with an identity-related element playing a critical role in nearly 90% of all incidents last year. Unit 42’s report highlights the explosive impact of identity abuse, and pins much of the problem on poor security controls and misconfigurations across interconnected tools and systems.
“Across the attack lifecycle, the biggest thing is that once you have an identity, you’ve got everything, you’ve got the key and you’re in,” Sam Rubin, senior vice president of consulting and threat intelligence at Unit 42, told CyberScoop. “From a defense standpoint, enterprises are still not very good at finding the signal in the noise, essentially the detection when an identity-based tactic is used because there isn’t unauthorized access per se from a technical telemetry standpoint, and it becomes a harder detection mechanism.”
Vulnerability exploits, an ever-moving target, were still prolific and accounted for 22% of initial intrusions across attacks, but humans remain the weakest link, Rubin said.
The rise of machine-based identities and AI agents, which require an identity to take action, is expanding the attack surface for cybercriminals. Identity challenges are manifesting in the software supply chain as well, as API access and SaaS integrations become another weak link and way in for attackers if control keys aren’t properly controlled.
An attack on Salesloft Drift customers last summer highlighted how tightly integrated services can unravel and expose victims that are multiple layers removed from the vendor. More than 700 organizations were impacted directly, but Salesloft Drift’s integrations with dozens of third-party tools opened many additional paths of potential compromise.
More broadly, attackers are jumping from branch offices into a victims’ headquarters or data centers because too many accounts remain over permissioned and cloud-based accounts are established with too much privilege or a lack of segmentation, Rubin said.
These gaps allow threat groups to turn break-ins into significant attacks.
“We just see this time and again that there could have been better identity-based practices that would have constrained the blast radius, even if it didn’t stop the initial access,” Rubin said.
“It’s a problem of signal and noise,” he added. “Think about a global enterprise and all of this authenticated, legitimate activity happening every day. How do you see and identify the one instance where a user is already authenticated but doing something that they shouldn’t do?”
Large and older organizations are at a greater disadvantage, Rubin said. Over time, their technology stacks have evolved to include legacy systems acquired through various business deals. This leaves IT teams managing a patchwork of disparate systems that are poorly integrated, creating significant security vulnerabilities.
“We forgot as defenders to consider the entire attack chain, because too often we see the defense happens in silos,” Rubin said, adding that attacks that pivot from endpoints to cloud-based services are commonly missed.
Each of those jumps gives defenders a chance to thwart attacks. Nearly 90% of the attacks Unit 42 investigated last year involved malicious activity across multiple attack surfaces.
Financially motivated attacks accounted for most of the 750 incidents Unit 42 responded to last year. Unit 42 did not say how many of those attacks resulted in payments, but it said median payments increased 87% year-over-year to $500,000 last year.
Attackers continue to pick up speed as well, exfiltrating data from victim networks under a median duration of two days. Attackers stole data in under one hour in 22% of the attacks Unit 42 responded to last year.
Unit 42’s annual look-back spotlights critical areas of concern and attack trends that continue to take root, yet it’s not comprehensive. The report’s visibility is limited to incidents that went from bad to worse and prompted victims to seek help from Unit 42.
“The hardest thing about incident response in cybersecurity,” Rubin said, “is there is no one global spot for how much is going on.”
The post Unit 42: Nearly two-thirds of breaches now start with identity abuse appeared first on CyberScoop.
Login